Look till you take a step back and rethink this from an unbiased opinion you will never understand....
I bumped this thread up to bring it back up. no need to beat around it over and over in EVERY post you put in here.
fact is that you blasted over and over again how the development was going to be poor here for this device wayyyy before it was released, citing things like the locked bootloader as reasons why it would be such, and doubting we'd get unlock shortly after release b/c of the state of the 3D's...which we did anyway btw...
fact is you claim this to be "less" development based on having 1-3 less active threads....sorry if we all give a crap if we are less by a couple threads....thats still vastly more than the picture you painted it would be like before it launched...
Again the argument wasn't that the LTE would have MORE/Less development than another device, BUT that you said the development would be flat out weak to none here, and its clear the development isn't weak here...regardless if its less than the SGS3, its far from weak....so stop pitting it against other devices when thats not even the point of the argument to begin with.
like I said earlier. The point of it was to show people you never ever doubt a device before its released and put through the paces....
Well, like I said, keep it in context.
Is development totally dead and non existent on this device? Of course not. And you may be happy with it. That's fine.
BUT, like I said, the Evo 3D has almost twice as many threads in the dev section posted in today. And the Evo 3D is a discontinued device that was considered to have weak dev support even back when it was the flagship HTC device on Sprint.
So, when I said this Evo LTE would have low dev support, you have to consider the context in which it was said. That was at the peak of the Evo 3D's lifespan. It (the 3D) had way more dev support than it (the 3D) does right now. And even so, lots of people were saying they'd never buy another 3D phone, or another Wimax phone, because the dev support on the 3D was so little. But right now, today, the now discontinued Evo 3D, which you said in your post had little support (you actually said I was complaining about things on the 3D not being supported, same difference) but that Evo 3D right now today has almost twice as many dev threads getting posted in than this Evo LTE.
So you may be happy with your device, and that is a good thing. But if you actually look at the facts here, I was pretty much correct. If you thought the Evo 3D had little dev support, then either you think the Evo LTE has little dev support (even less than the 3D in its prime) or you have changed your standards for what you consider "little" dev support to be.