
16th August 2011, 07:38 AM
|
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 10
Posts: 109
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
Google to buy Motorola -- what do you think?
Google is planning to buy Motorola.
Do you think this is good or bad news for Samsung and the S2?
See:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14530543
|

16th August 2011, 08:42 AM
|
Member
Thanks Meter 7
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
I think it's great news. By bying Motorola with all it's patents, Google is able to countersue Microsoft, which wants a licence for every sold HTC and latest Samsung phones with Android. Google can then demand a licence for every sold Microsoft phone, or demand that Microsoft removes the licenceagreement for HTC, and stops the case against Samsung. So Google is in a better position, to defend it's licencees now, which they have promised.
So... bad news for Nokia and Microsoft, but great news for Android in generel.
Sent from my korean dual-core beast
______________________
Former devices:
Nokia 6200i / stock (What a piece of sh... buggy as hell - never Nokia again)
SE T68i / stock (handsome design for the time - still got it)
SE W800i / stock (call that a dumbphone one more time... still got it)
HTC Wildfire / stock (slow, but a nice package)
Present devices:
Samsung Galaxy S II / stock - LPG_NEE (buggy from the start - and still is. New problems by every update)
|

16th August 2011, 08:53 AM
|
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 10
Posts: 109
Join Date: Jun 2011
|
But do you think that Samsung and HTC will become third class citizens with only Motorola having access to the latest leading edge software?
After all Google/Motorola will become competitors to Samsung!
|

16th August 2011, 10:41 AM
|
Member
Thanks Meter 7
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
No, i don't. And my reason is that Google live of commercials delivered through their products. By reducing the rest of their licencees, they risk to push them to the competitors, which in this case first and foremost is Windows Phone 7 - if that happens, they have no income. So Google should be interested in pushing as much licences as possible, and by betting only on Motorola would be a serious risk.
By placing it all on one horse, Google WILL loose money, as they don't sell as much advertisingspaces.
Furthermore Android will face a serious competition, when Nokia starts selling Windows phones. Nokia IS the worlds biggest phonepusher, but not yet on smartphones. Again a reason not to reduce the licencees, as they produce very capable phones, which even is posing a threat against Apple.
I really think that Google saw a problem coming up, as they did'nt get the Nortel patents. And even if they did, they could'nt use the patents to protect the licencees, as Microsoft were in on the same deal. So they had to do something to keep the money rolling in, by protecting Android and the licencees, and this was the way to do it... :)
|

16th August 2011, 12:28 PM
|
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 3
Posts: 27
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Seems like to me Google wants to compete with Apple on the Hardware front... Altho I am not sure what this may mean for all the other android phone manufacturers becuase now they are also competing with Google directly rather than having a direct partnership per se...
|

16th August 2011, 12:38 PM
|
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 207
Posts: 1,048
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddiedk
I think it's great news. By bying Motorola with all it's patents, Google is able to countersue Microsoft, which wants a licence for every sold HTC and latest Samsung phones with Android. Google can then demand a licence for every sold Microsoft phone, or demand that Microsoft removes the licenceagreement for HTC, and stops the case against Samsung. So Google is in a better position, to defend it's licencees now, which they have promised.
So... bad news for Nokia and Microsoft, but great news for Android in generel.
Sent from my korean dual-core beast
|
This has nothing to do with the Microsoft patents and nothing Motorola has will effect the main MS claims. Its about protecting Android from Oracle and Apple. Oracle want money, LOTS, but the real danger is Apple who want bans. Apple are scum who buy patents to cause trouble, not gain IP for their own use.
|

16th August 2011, 12:40 PM
|
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 207
Posts: 1,048
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eddiedk
No, i don't. And my reason is that Google live of commercials delivered through their products. By reducing the rest of their licencees, they risk to push them to the competitors, which in this case first and foremost is Windows Phone 7 - if that happens, they have no income. So Google should be interested in pushing as much licences as possible, and by betting only on Motorola would be a serious risk.
By placing it all on one horse, Google WILL loose money, as they don't sell as much advertisingspaces.
Furthermore Android will face a serious competition, when Nokia starts selling Windows phones. Nokia IS the worlds biggest phonepusher, but not yet on smartphones. Again a reason not to reduce the licencees, as they produce very capable phones, which even is posing a threat against Apple.
I really think that Google saw a problem coming up, as they did'nt get the Nortel patents. And even if they did, they could'nt use the patents to protect the licencees, as Microsoft were in on the same deal. So they had to do something to keep the money rolling in, by protecting Android and the licencees, and this was the way to do it... :)
|
Nokia was and had been number one in smartphones for many years until just one quarter ago. Its still officially second.
|

16th August 2011, 12:48 PM
(Last edited by systemcrasher; 16th August 2011 at 01:02 PM.)
|
Member
Thanks Meter 6
Posts: 62
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney
|
I don't think Google will be that stupid to buy Motorola and then suddenly stop releasing Android phones for other manufacturers such as Samsung and HTC..
After all, Android has such a big market share because different manufacturers are able to release the phones using the Android operating system.
Like suggested above, Google may be thinking of going head to head with Apple on both software and hardware front..
Also, it could be a way for Google to make sure no Motorola phones are released with other operating systems - which in turn gives Google more concrete operating market share and profit by selling Motorola hardware.
I think it is going to workout pretty well in the end.
oh, also, I don't think Nokia+Windows mobile is such a big threat.... for some weird reason, Nokia's customer service went dismal couple of years back and by the time I gave up using N97 end of last year, Nokia's customer service and support was basically non-existent. Also Symbian's support for basic 21st century functions - i.e supporting multiple languages etc still lags behind other operating systems... And let's face it.. Windows Mobile isn't that great either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samsung Galaxy SII @ 1.6Ghz Stable

Intel i990X @ 3.7Ghz, ASUS Rampage Extreme III, Nvidia GTX580
Corsair Vengeance 24Gigs @ 2000Mhz, OCZ Vertex 3
Thermaltake Level 10, Logitech G19, Logitech MX518
Thermaltake Tough Power 1300W, ASUS 27"
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|