Introducing XDA:DevCon – A Conference For Developers By Developers
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?
 
Post Reply+
Tip us?
 
goku86
Old
(Last edited by goku86; 4th November 2011 at 09:28 PM.)
#1  
goku86's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 33
Posts: 121
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ATHENS
Default Exotic Combination of I9001XXKP4 ROM & The Great CRANIUM RC2 Custom One

Fisrt I Flashed I9001XXKP4 2.3.4, I got my stock ROM Rooted and then Installed manveru0's CWM Recovery and KERNEL as he describes procedure HERE http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...295284&page=15...Last step i Installed the Great Sakindia's CRANIUM RC2 ROM From manveru0's CWM "INSTALL ZIP FILE OPTION"...After installation finished i applied
adrenaline shot v12 patch.
I've got to say i got some really strange results from CF-Bench
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	shot_000001.jpg
Views:	434
Size:	32.2 KB
ID:	771865   Click image for larger version

Name:	shot_000002.jpg
Views:	354
Size:	35.5 KB
ID:	771866  
 
manveru0
Old
#2  
manveru0's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 247
Posts: 285
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bern
Quote:
Originally Posted by goku86 View Post
Fisrt I Flashed I9001XXKP4 2.3.4, I got my stock ROM Rooted and then Installed manveru0's CWM Recovery and KERNEL as he describes procedure HERE http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...295284&page=15...Last step i Installed the Great Sakindia's CRANIUM RC2 ROM From manveru0's CWM "INSTALL ZIP FILE OPTION"...After installation finished i applied
adrenaline shot v12 patch.
I've got to say i got some really strange results from CF-Bench

I have not installed Cranium Rom and my ratings are normal for an almost stock kernel. Forget about the Adrenaline shot since my kernel doesn't support init.d yet. So maybe Sakindia can explain why your ratings are like that?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	ratings.jpeg
Views:	167
Size:	63.5 KB
ID:	771912  
The Following User Says Thank You to manveru0 For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
kugyman
Old
#3  
Member
Thanks Meter 25
Posts: 46
Join Date: Nov 2010
By strange result you mean a ****ty result?
I run a 5346,2056,3372 on a 2.3.5 I9001 BUKP1, GINGERBREAD.BUKP2, and I am not realy happy with it.
 
manveru0
Old
#4  
manveru0's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 247
Posts: 285
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bern
Quote:
Originally Posted by kugyman View Post
By strange result you mean a ****ty result?
I run a 5346,2056,3372 on a 2.3.5 I9001 BUKP1, GINGERBREAD.BUKP2, and I am not realy happy with it.
I have run the cf-bench once again on a stock rom 2.3.4 with stock kernel. the results are: 6125, 2523, 3963.

They are slightly better than with my kernel. So at least I know that my kernel ain't that bad. Maybe the results would be better if the default governor is set to performance. But again, that ain't a good idea for a mobile device I guess.
 
goku86
Old
#5  
goku86's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 33
Posts: 121
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: ATHENS
I run again CF-Bench and i got same results, but for the third time i got 6400 2500 4200 approximately...some glitch of CF-Bench.
But as usual i like experimenting randomly than spending time and effort, like our expert friends here like manveru0, sakindia and others.
My friend manveru0 you re doing great, you work for CWM is essential for getting a step further so to get a good custom rom.
I hope you'll continue..
 
Post Reply+
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

report this ad
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Go to top of page...