Originally Posted by mobuch

lol.. i was playing with it yesterday evening but went from1 up to 100.. lol..
Just checked now, seems that 1000 is the proper vibration strength we all know from GB.

Originally Posted by _strauch_

Yes 1000 is good. 1001 or above dind't work anymore

Well, in code value 1000 is the only possible:

265     if(value ==1000)
266     {
267         ImmVibeSPI_ForceOut_AmpEnable(0);
268         vibe_set_pwm_freq(121);
269 
270         mdelay(1000);
271 
272         ImmVibeSPI_ForceOut_AmpDisable(0);
273     }

Originally Posted by vpupkin

Well, in code value 1000 is the only possible:

265     if(value ==1000)
266     {
267         ImmVibeSPI_ForceOut_AmpEnable(0);
268         vibe_set_pwm_freq(121);
269 
270         mdelay(1000);
271 
272         ImmVibeSPI_ForceOut_AmpDisable(0);
273     }

how can u see that. if iopen this file it is empty???

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk

Originally Posted by bruzzler2809

how can u see that. if iopen this file it is empty???

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk

Ha-ha, it's in kernel module code, not in that file

So if i understand correctly u have managed to increase the vibration power and now u have to set the proper intervals ? I dont have any idea about coding but ... is the hard part over ?

For people with the volume problem maybe this will help;

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1537420

Now hope for a kernel with vibration fix...

Originally Posted by perilousx

For people with the volume problem maybe this will help;

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1537420

why do you post this link again?
you already posted it

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...6#post25038836

Originally Posted by vitaliy_y

Hello, I'm prepared of test build Arco kernel, download cwm zip from my repo in GitHub
- SmartsAssv2
- SIO
- VolumeBoost
- OC/UV.

Big THT Arco

Can we please keep the topic with the original development ? i mean for modified kernels you can create your own topic and since you have it, maybe you can make a new version compatible with CM9 there, not here please.

We would like here to test stock CM9 without OC/UV or other additions.

Thank you.

Originally Posted by Mirceabadea

Can we please keep the topic with the original development ? i mean for modified kernels you can create your own topic and since you have it, maybe you can make a new version compatible with CM9 there, not here please.

We would like here to test stock CM9 without OC/UV or other additions.

Thank you.

well read the last 100 pages and you will notice that there are only 10-15 pages filled with dev related stuff

Originally Posted by Blumdum

well read the last 100 pages and you will notice that there are only 10-15 pages filled with dev related stuff

Maybe arco should open an new thread. But i think we should get a stable kernel first, bevor we build another kernel. I'm afraid that someone installs a different kernel and says to acro, that there is something wrong.

And a new thread for another kernel developement should be nice.