Originally Posted by creeve4

sampling_rate_min has been set by Franco, although it may be possible to change it with an init.d script. Too bad the sampling rate can not be set lower... I would also like to set it to 15000

i read that only in 230 it cant be set lower

For those looking for better performance than the stock settings, use 384/1200 interactive instead of ondemand with a high max freq (I tried 1420 and 1536 steps). I did some tests and the first setup always yields better real life performance, better benchmarks, and better screen on time.

Wheatley on the other hand I have not tested yet.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by godisanatheist

For those looking for better performance than the stock settings, use 384/1200 interactive instead of ondemand with a high max freq (I tried 1420 and 1536 steps). I did some tests and the first setup always yields better real life performance, better benchmarks, and better screen on time.

Wheatley on the other hand I have not tested yet.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

What do you mean by the "first setup"?

Let us know what you find with Wheatley.

Would it be possible to add into the Franco application, an option to install a stock kernel? [I ask as my nandroid is corrupted].

Originally Posted by martindesu

Would it be possible to add into the Franco application, an option to install a stock kernel? [I ask as my nandroid is corrupted].

There are two stock kernels, ICS and JB. If you google it, you can find either one.

Originally Posted by creeve4

What do you mean by the "first setup"?

Let us know what you find with Wheatley.

384/1200 interactive

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

384/1228 interactive. R230 512 gpu. Official gsm extended battery. Mostly wifi and a couple hours of 3g.


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by TEK112

There are two stock kernels, ICS and JB. If you google it, you can find either one.

Would you be kind enough to show me? I can't seem to dig it out.

Originally Posted by godisanatheist

384/1228 interactive. R230 512 gpu. Official gsm extended battery. Mostly wifi and a couple hours of 3g.


Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Had you used the 384 before, by any chance? If so, how did it compare?

Also, kudos on the nick.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by rmcsc

Had you used the 384 before, by any chance? If so, how did it compare?

Also, kudos on the nick.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

On ics I did some tests between the two. Virtually the same battery life. I think 512 gpu only affects battery life negatively if you're playing 3d games a lot since that's prob the only time it'll ramp all the way to 512.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2