Originally Posted by astrakid

why? what is the advantage?

regards,
astrakid

Since we're NOT having sources for the bootloader, no one except samsung can tell you what has changed and what not.

But we've reverse engineered this bloody thing and can tell you for sure, that it contains that little green alien everyone was waiting for.
So if you wanna have this little green alien on your phone, flash it!!!

Like the great said some posta ago its dificult to say what changes from gb bootloader to ics but its the user who have to decide, but remember if you dont feel confortable with odin stay away it could brick your baby

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

I'm not sure if will work or what, but I've read a property for build.prop to avoid NITZ.

It's "ro.ril.enable.nitz=1"
I'm not sure if it's real or not, I'm just a normal user, but I've read that on ICS/CM9 for Cooper (Galaxy Ace) and I just want to help

Saludos!

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Originally Posted by codeworkx

But we've reverse engineered this bloody thing and can tell you for sure, that it contains that little green alien everyone was waiting for.
So if you wanna have this little green alien on your phone, flash it!!!

i want to have it, but with the lowest effort. ;)
so if it is possible i would use the simple cwm-way, which means that i don't use the ics-bootloader by now.

i will just try it. hope not to disturb you all with my need for help if i bricked it. )

regards,
thanks,
andre

Originally Posted by jknvv13

I'm not sure if will work or what, but I've read a property for build.prop to avoid NITZ.

It's "ro.ril.enable.nitz=1"
I'm not sure if it's real or not, I'm just a normal user, but I've read that on ICS/CM9 for Cooper (Galaxy Ace) and I just want to help

Saludos!

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

b******t.

there is one but it's not named this way.
and this is not helpful because this just ignores what's coming into the framework.
but our problem is one level lower.

Originally Posted by codeworkx

bull****.

there is one but it's not named this way.
and this is not helpful because this just ignores what's coming into the framework.
but our problem is one level lower.

OMG man. In real life you are just a normal person with a normal life and nobody is interested in you.

Don't think that you can be rude just because some ppl in this scene are looking up to you my friend.

Greetings from Frankfurt

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Originally Posted by Skyline92

OMG man. In real life you are just a normal person with a normal life and nobody is interested in you.

Don't think that you can be rude just because some ppl in this scene are looking up to you my friend.

Greetings from Frankfurt

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

i don't like people who are copying some stuff they don't understand and make other people who don't understand what it does trying it.

read through the last 100 pages, then you know why devs are going away from xda or starting to be rude.

try
ro.no_bugs=yes

if you think you might have found something usefull, have a look at the sourcecode before making it public.
it's simple, easy and doesn't hurt.

Originally Posted by codeworkx

As a workaround for the low headset volume:

- Extract the zip
- Push all four files to /system/bin
- Set permissions (chmod 0777 /system/bin/volumehack.sh)
- Run /system/bin/volumehack.sh headset apply

Note: This is temporary and gets overwritten by the sound driver.

Just as a workaround. We have to fix this damn thing anyway.

I Followed your instructions but had the message:

No Device selected.

What I'm doing wrong?

Originally Posted by TheRplima

I Followed your instructions but had the message:

No Device selected.

What I'm doing wrong?

You didn't follow it.

/system/bin/volumehack.sh headset apply

Just tried this and wow, its an amazing alpha build!
Great work, so well done and thanks!

Looks like vodafone UK use NITZ, so can't use it but was fun to play with!

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App