[Q] How benchmarks fared on HC ?

---

anyone tried benchmarks on honeycomb...? please share some results.... that will help all decide to update to HC or not on performance grounds....
thnx

Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom

Originally Posted by mcord11758

Which benchmarks. Will depend if user is running a rom

general ones quadrant, linpack ,pi ,antutu , browsermark and others... i was asking about official rom HC 3.2.1

benchmark

---

I ran the Quadrant app. dont know much about it, guess I did it correctly- I ran the full benchmark and my device scored 2096. I've ran it 3 times, each time it scores between 1900-2000 range. my device is a stock View 4G upgraded to Honeycomb through system updates. I updated over wifi, I don't have a sprint data plan. hope this helps-

Quadrant is same as it was on GB interesting!!! 3D n 2D benchmark scores on GB were quite low... i guess honeycomb wont affect these thing these r mainly depend on GPU n processor...
there will b just marginal difference...

With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps

Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results

I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs

When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance

Originally Posted by Flyer.michael

With Nenemark2 i get 23-25 fps on Honeycomb
GB it was around 12-14 fps

Vellamo between 850-1100 - dont remember GB results

I would ask you not to mention specific ROMs

When the HD2 came out, the first months it was all about benchmark results...
There were ROM ranking lists based on benchmarks... but the comunity realized fast this was pure bull**** so it stopped after a while
Cooks optimized only for specfic benchmarks to get on top casue people started looking only at results... which often had nothin to do wit real life performance

after reading thing i might move to honeycomb .... so we get improved graphics perfomance.....
and vellamo was 820 on GB...
so flyer was under powered with GB...
i heard 1.5 ghz processor was also under powered so i guess bechmark pi will also give better result...
thanx man please test some more on HC... antutu gave a bad score with GB