Originally Posted by basily

app_29@android:/ $ export PATH=/data/local/bin:$PATH
app_29@android:/ $ su
app_29@android:/ # md temp
sh: md: not found
127|app_29@android:/ # cp
sh: cp: not found
127|app_29@android:/ #

Doesn't that indicate that it's not properly symlinked?

Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium

EDIT: oops! Got DOS in my head. md isn't a command, but cp should be, no?

Try
busybox cp instead of cp

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by krarvind

Try
busybox cp instead of cp

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Thanks but I've already installed the KagadarLinkFixer260312v1 script to fix the symlinks to busybox and now the S30datafix works (at least through adb shell, not sure if it actually runs at startup or not).

I'm not sure why busybox wasn't correctly symlinked on my phone. I had done a clean install of slim 3.4 a couple of weeks ago, and just upgraded to 3.6 2 days ago...

Originally Posted by krarvind

Try
busybox cp instead of cp

would that mean that busybox is not properly symlinked if BUSYBOX CP works and without the BUSYBOX doesn't?

greetz,

sUsH

Originally Posted by sUsH667

would that mean that busybox is not properly symlinked if BUSYBOX CP works and without the BUSYBOX doesn't?

greetz,

sUsH

Works for fine for me, cp

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by krarvind

Works for fine for me, cp

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

i'm just asking to be sure: if it doesn't work without the busybox-prefix, does that mean that busybox isn't properly symlinked and i should try the linkfixer or a busybox-update?

greetz,

sUsH

hi krarvind ...after many attempts i could installa your slim ics(before it didn't recognised my sim card)...now all perfect!! i installed it for 30 minutes and i immediately noticed that it is fast, smooth, lagless...P-E-R-F-E-C-T!!!! really really congrats

How much memory is found total and free when I port Galaxy S I9000 to this ROM

Originally Posted by sUsH667

i'm just asking to be sure: if it doesn't work without the busybox-prefix, does that mean that busybox isn't properly symlinked and i should try the linkfixer or a busybox-update?

greetz,

sUsH

My less-than-expert opinion is that YES, that would mean that busybox isn't properly symlinked. I used the linkfixer and it did the trick for me.

Originally Posted by basily

My less-than-expert opinion is that YES, that would mean that busybox isn't properly symlinked. I used the linkfixer and it did the trick for me.

Not true. I just tested on sgs and Gnex, no busybox is needed to execute cp via adb shell and terminal emulator. I can tell you that it is symlinked properly ever since i put in the fix. my updater script now does the same thing as linkfixer, just symlinks everything in xbin folder.. Why it doesn't work for you i don't know.

Originally Posted by maqbulsayed

How much memory is found total and free when I port Galaxy S I9000 to this ROM

1 gig free for me