Post Reply

[STOCK KERNEL][NOV20] guestekrnL v2.2.1 | stable, smooth [VIBRO- &RAMHACK] [AROMA]

OP Stefan Gündhör

28th May 2012, 01:43 PM   |  #1331  
Ferrum Master's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Rīga
Thanks Meter: 272
 
920 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2010
More
Stefan... the kernel name. You're a troll...
28th May 2012, 01:46 PM   |  #1332  
Stefan Gündhör's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Austria
Thanks Meter: 5,165
 
1,991 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferrum Master

Stefan... the kernel name. You're a troll...

Just a randomly chosen cryptic name bro Needed to spice up the kernel a bit
28th May 2012, 01:47 PM   |  #1333  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 813
 
1,263 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
More
LOL

Can you say me why the kernel has worse scrolling with OC (1.3GHz) than with 1GHz?
28th May 2012, 01:52 PM   |  #1334  
Ferrum Master's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Rīga
Thanks Meter: 272
 
920 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flix123

LOL

Can you say me why the kernel has worse scrolling with OC (1.3GHz) than with 1GHz?

Actually you're right... (screwing the good mood )

The second core kick in freq too high?
28th May 2012, 02:03 PM   |  #1335  
Stefan Gündhör's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Austria
Thanks Meter: 5,165
 
1,991 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flix123

LOL

Can you say me why the kernel has worse scrolling with OC (1.3GHz) than with 1GHz?

I don't have this myself using the rebuilt version of latest kernel, srolling like butter @1.3 GHz.
I can only think of maybe the voltage @1.3 GHz is a bit too low resulting in a laggier behavior. I chose the voltage so there won't be freezes but maybe kernel gets less smoother when voltage is low? Dunno. Try the rebuilt version or try overvolting @1.3 ghz a bit or play around with second core settings (later activation per example, because imo phone scrolls better when 1 core is active than when both are evern if this would be ridiculous if it is true)
The Following User Says Thank You to Stefan Gündhör For This Useful Post: [ View ]
28th May 2012, 03:50 PM   |  #1336  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 813
 
1,263 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
More
It doesn't help. In every case, scrolling at 1.3GHz s more like with V20q sources at 800MHz--> worse than without OC.

The crazy thing is, that @1.3GHz it's smoother with disabled 2nd core!
28th May 2012, 03:56 PM   |  #1337  
Stefan Gündhör's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Austria
Thanks Meter: 5,165
 
1,991 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flix123

It doesn't help. In every case, scrolling at 1.3GHz s more like with V20q sources at 800MHz--> worse than without OC.

The crazy thing is, that @1.3GHz it's smoother with disabled 2nd core!

Okay so you got the same impression as me
Quote:

because imo phone scrolls better when 1 core is active than when both are even if this would be ridiculous if it is true

I don't think this is something I can influence in general with changing the kernel source. Without auto-secondcore-limits second core will be used earlier/more often when phone is overclocked.
You can try enabling auto-secondcore-limits or manually set a higher activation freq for second core and higher activation-time when phone is OC'd.
28th May 2012, 03:59 PM   |  #1338  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 813
 
1,263 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
More
It's the same effect like when you use framework with disabled scrolling cache with a V10 based kernel.

This issue isn't very important for me, because I usually don't use OC. I just wonder what causes this issue.

Later I'll try to mod the kernel and build an own one.
28th May 2012, 04:02 PM   |  #1339  
Stefan Gündhör's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Austria
Thanks Meter: 5,165
 
1,991 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flix123

Later I'll try to mod the kernel and build an own one.

Yeah do that I restructured the guide, so it will be even easier to follow
28th May 2012, 04:02 PM   |  #1340  
Bir92's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Berlin
Thanks Meter: 65
 
423 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2011
More
Thanks Stefan

But Im a bit confused I flashed your Kernel yesterday and the size is 4.309 bytes and today I downloaded another one and the size is 4.329 bytes ...does this mean I already flashed the new one yesterday?
Thanks

Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Top Threads in Optimus 2x Android Development by ThreadRank