FORUMS

Make Your Network Smart – XDA Xposed Tuesday

We rave about the features and abilities of our smartphones. However, in order for … more

Dr.Ketan Brings The S6 Theme Store To The Note 4

Dr.Ketan has submitted a video to the forums showing a functional port of the Galaxy S6 … more

Do You Have Insurance on Your Smartphone?

While affordable smartphones are becoming more available, the majority of high-end flagships … more

Apple Music Will Increase iTunes Match to 100,000 Songs

The battle for music streaming subscription dominance is starting to really heat … more

ICS Roms Benchmarked

542 posts
Thanks Meter: 182
 
By horndroid, Senior Member on 28th March 2012, 06:59 AM
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread
Used Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
This was done on 3-28-2012. Pretty much all the ROMs have had new releases since then. So these benchmarks do not accurately reflect the current performance of the ROMs.
Full wipe procedure done before each flash.
Coldboot done for each ROM before running Quadrant. Not doing coldboot resulted in lower I/O score in some cases.

Testing was done using the default settings and kernel of the ROM. No kernels were flashed separately.
Overclock was tested only if the ROM and its default kernel supported it, using the maximum frequency allowed in the ROM's settings + force GPU rendering set to enable in developer settings.













Android 4.0.4 ROM

Last edited by horndroid; 2nd April 2012 at 09:21 PM.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to horndroid For This Useful Post: [ View ]
 
 
28th March 2012, 09:41 AM |#2  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 37
 
More
What the hell is going on with the 2D scores? Why is stock so far ahead of the others?
28th March 2012, 09:54 AM |#3  
Goatshocker's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 416
 
More
I dont have any fancy diagrams or tables like you but...
I ran quadrant on eos build 12 and got a total of 3.5k (average, 3 runs).

Settings: CPU at 1.4Ghz, no forced gpu rendering.
Breakdown:
cpu: 6200
memory: 3200
I/O: 6000
2D: 110
3D: 1800

Interesting though that stock ICS performs that well compared to the other roms.
So in raw performance there isnt much difference between custom and stock rom, until you start tuning the cpu.
28th March 2012, 10:00 AM |#4  
OP Senior Member
San Francisco
Thanks Meter: 182
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by cspiby

What the hell is going on with the 2D scores? Why is stock so far ahead of the others?

Enabling "force GPU rendering" on other ROMs increases the 2d scores to around 400.
28th March 2012, 10:00 AM |#5  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 37
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by horndroid

Enabling "force GPU rendering" on other ROMs increases the 2d scores to around 400.

So is that stock rom doing that by default or what?
28th March 2012, 10:06 AM |#6  
OP Senior Member
San Francisco
Thanks Meter: 182
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by cspiby

So is that stock rom doing that by default or what?

Probably.
I tested it again. Stock ROM is giving those scores without force gpu rendering
Last edited by horndroid; 28th March 2012 at 11:12 AM.
28th March 2012, 12:23 PM |#7  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 29
 
More
Funny thing, stock is way better with 2d rendering, EOS and CM9 are faster in I/O...
28th March 2012, 11:02 PM |#8  
OP Senior Member
San Francisco
Thanks Meter: 182
 
More
Yup, the reason EOS and CM9 have such high scores is because of the I/O. I wonder how perceivable the difference is to an average user.

Team EOS's has a tiny FPS lag when scrolling home screens despite its high score.
29th March 2012, 01:13 PM |#9  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 29
 
More
Just got a quadrant score of 4237 with CM9 lastest (28-03) and guevor test 4 kernel at 1640mhz.
29th March 2012, 01:34 PM |#10  
OP Senior Member
San Francisco
Thanks Meter: 182
 
More
Here's what I got. Pretty much same as yours.
The Following User Says Thank You to horndroid For This Useful Post: [ View ]
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes