Originally Posted by ziroxs

Hi,

here are my screenshots with the 2.17 thoravukk kernel. Now i am going to flash the new update of ROM.
I forgot the picture of display time, it is in this case 4h50min ! With a rest of 35% battery. 42 hours in standby mode, of this 28 hours with Wifi always on.

I used VC extreme as well with following settings and started it as a service.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...7&postcount=66

Post screen on time screenshot , that's what matters the most.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5

This kernel is realy extrem battery friendly and still fast and smooth.
Verry good kernel you have made. Will stick to it.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Just tried v2.21 this kernel looks promising, kudos to you buddy nice job

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Originally Posted by bajee11

Post screen on time screenshot , that's what matters the most.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5

Sry i forgot in this case the screenshot for the display time. But as i said it was 4h50min.

Originally Posted by ziroxs

Sry i forgot in this case the screenshot for the display time. But as i said it was 4h50min.

What are your scheduler and CPU governer..?
I dont know wich is the most battery friendly

Thanks for this kernel !
with voltage control and little voltage settings, battery life is amazing
go on with your perfect work

Originally Posted by Batskoning

What are your scheduler and CPU governer..?
I dont know wich is the most battery friendly

I used vr/ondemand.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Originally Posted by sduford

I'm currently trying out Dragon ICS v1.7m=, which comes with Syiah. Has anyone tried this kernel with Dragon?

I can cofirm that 2.21 works well with Dragon ROM.

Originally Posted by ziroxs

I used vr/ondemand.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Im using CFQ/SmartassV2
Because of this:

6) V(R)

Unlike other schedulers, synchronous and asynchronous requests are not treated separately, instead a deadline is imposed for fairness. The next request to be served is based on it's distance from last request.

Advantages:
May be best for benchmarking because at the peak of it's 'form' VR performs best.
Disadvantages:
Performance fluctuation results in below-average performance at times.
Least reliable/most unstable.

3) CFQ

Completely Fair Queuing scheduler maintains a scalable per-process I/O queue and attempts to distribute the available I/O bandwidth equally among all I/O requests. Each per-process queue contains synchronous requests from processes. Time slice allocated for each queue depends on the priority of the 'parent' process. V2 of CFQ has some fixes which solves process' i/o starvation and some small backward seeks in the hope of improving responsiveness.

Advantages:
Considered to deliver a balanced i/o performance.
Easiest to tune.
Excels on multiprocessor systems.
Best database system performance after deadline.
Disadvantages:
Some users report media scanning takes longest to complete using CFQ. This could be because of the property that since the bandwidth is equally distributed to all i/o operations during boot-up, media scanning is not given any special priority.
Jitter (worst-case-delay) exhibited can sometimes be high, because of the number of tasks competing for the disk.

Is there a possibility to have this kernel on stock deodexed roms as is for syiah kernel?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2