Originally Posted by tylercarter

I never understood why people use the 100 step. Same voltage as 200 and one less frequency to scale which would save battery.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

I'm using ics remix rom you can set individual voltages for every step.. its not the same on mine

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

I'm getting MUCH better battery life with 323 than with 322.

Thanks!

you guys should be seeing 3.2.4 pretty soon eh?

Originally Posted by tylercarter

I never understood why people use the 100 step. Same voltage as 200 and one less frequency to scale which would save battery.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

When I used all 18 steps I noticed my phone liked to spend a lot of time at 100. I ended up choosing the option for the least amount of steps that included 100mhz (6 steps +100 and 1400 i believe) and battery life improved over just the 5 steps.

Sent from my Task'd AOKP Horned Pony

Originally Posted by djfotizo

When I used all 18 steps I noticed my phone liked to spend a lot of time at 100. I ended up choosing the option for the least amount of steps that included 100mhz (6 steps +100 and 1400 i believe) and battery life improved over just the 5 steps.

Sent from my Task'd AOKP Horned Pony

100mhz and 200mhz are the same voltage. Unless u undervolted the 100mhz step it was just placebo.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by tylercarter

100mhz and 200mhz are the same voltage. Unless u undervolted the 100mhz step it was just placebo.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

on ics remix its 25mv lower as default

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

Originally Posted by SPBoss

on ics remix its 25mv lower as default

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

the rom has nothing to do with it. its in the kernel. adding another step (100) and then undervolting it 25 is counter productive because it give the cpu another step to scale. so in all reality it does nothing special and most often times offers no battery savings. even if it did not very much at all. -25 is not a lot of power on one step.

Originally Posted by tylercarter

I never understood why people use the 100 step. Same voltage as 200 and one less frequency to scale which would save battery.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2

I've seen it explained as P=f*V^2 (yeah, I know there are supposed to be some other variables in there). So while the power consumed drops rapidly with undervolting, it also drops with underclocking.

Also as my first post in the thread, I have to say, great kernel. Love the customizability. Thanks for porting it over, ktoonsez.

What is pegasusq governor? Can anyone link me to information on it?

Originally Posted by Jorlando74

I've seen it explained as P=f*V^2 (yeah, I know there are supposed to be some other variables in there). So while the power consumed drops rapidly with undervolting, it also drops with underclocking.

Also as my first post in the thread, I have to say, great kernel. Love the customizability. Thanks for porting it over, ktoonsez.

correct except when scaling more frequencies. it more or less counters undervolting the more steps u add though. just me experience.

---------- Post added at 11:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:51 AM ----------

Originally Posted by obtained

What is pegasusq governor? Can anyone link me to information on it?