Attend XDA's Second Annual Developer Conference, XDA:DevCon 2014!
5,736,443 Members 50,009 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum

Fragmentation of Apps in AppStore

Tip us?
 
k33t
Old
#1  
Junior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 13
Posts: 26
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Gurgaon, Haryana
Cool Fragmentation of Apps in AppStore

Social media and mobile apps seem to be the new buzz words over at Silicon Valley. In fact, such apps are now a dime a dozen and one could imagine Apple changing their popular catchphrase “There’s an app for that!” into “There are a thousand different apps for that, all of which have the same basic features, but subtle useless differences.”

The problem isn’t that we are approaching the boundaries of utility as far as mobile apps are concerned, it’s just that once an app or social service gets popular, developers start crowding around its concept and make thousands of clone apps, with little in terms of differentiation. We need more unique and original apps that stretch the boundaries of what we can accomplish with our phones and tablets and make you think “Wow! Who would have thought I could do that with this little thing I carry around with me?!” What we’re getting are the same basic concepts, re-hashed to such an insane degree that app stores get crowded with half-baked clone apps and the really amazing ones are drowned out in a sea of filth.

In my opinion, developers should ask themselves three basic questions before designing an app or a social service:

“Has this been done before?”

“If it has, can I do it in a way that is better/more pleasant to use?”

“If no, would I be able to introduce any sort of useful feature except a wacky name?”

And if the answers to all three questions are unfavourable, then the developer should think twice about coding such an app. It would only add redundancy to the app store and contribute to the rising app discovery epidemic.

I shudder to think about all the high quality apps made by independent developers all over the world that haven’t been popularized simply because of an overly saturated market. The amount of lost potential in app markets today is simply staggering.

Apart from market saturation, redundant apps also tend to cause mental saturation. In this day and age, who among us has the capacity to remember a billion app names? If we can’t even remember such a numerous volume of apps, how can we aspire to use them?

In my opinion, authorities like Apple and Google should monitor the apps in their stores not just for quality, but for identity of vision as well. Apps that feel like cheap copies of pre-existing apps need to be banned! I, for one have had enough of my normal friends playing ruddy Fruit Ninja clones and asking me why it doesn’t look as good as it does on my phone!

There are shining examples of how stupendously done apps with a clear and fresh vision can go viral within days of conception. They are the intellectual property of individuals that have worked hard to develop not just the code for their apps, but the core concept as well. And we owe it to those striving developers to make sure that the integrity of that core concept remains preserved.
 
Guru Zeb
Old
#2  
Guru Zeb's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 34
Posts: 122
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Up North !!!!!!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by k33t View Post
Social media and mobile apps seem to be the new buzz words over at Silicon Valley. In fact, such apps are now a dime a dozen and one could imagine Apple changing their popular catchphrase “There’s an app for that!” into “There are a thousand different apps for that, all of which have the same basic features, but subtle useless differences.”

The problem isn’t that we are approaching the boundaries of utility as far as mobile apps are concerned, it’s just that once an app or social service gets popular, developers start crowding around its concept and make thousands of clone apps, with little in terms of differentiation. We need more unique and original apps that stretch the boundaries of what we can accomplish with our phones and tablets and make you think “Wow! Who would have thought I could do that with this little thing I carry around with me?!” What we’re getting are the same basic concepts, re-hashed to such an insane degree that app stores get crowded with half-baked clone apps and the really amazing ones are drowned out in a sea of filth.

In my opinion, developers should ask themselves three basic questions before designing an app or a social service:

“Has this been done before?”

“If it has, can I do it in a way that is better/more pleasant to use?”

“If no, would I be able to introduce any sort of useful feature except a wacky name?”

And if the answers to all three questions are unfavourable, then the developer should think twice about coding such an app. It would only add redundancy to the app store and contribute to the rising app discovery epidemic.

I shudder to think about all the high quality apps made by independent developers all over the world that haven’t been popularized simply because of an overly saturated market. The amount of lost potential in app markets today is simply staggering.

Apart from market saturation, redundant apps also tend to cause mental saturation. In this day and age, who among us has the capacity to remember a billion app names? If we can’t even remember such a numerous volume of apps, how can we aspire to use them?

In my opinion, authorities like Apple and Google should monitor the apps in their stores not just for quality, but for identity of vision as well. Apps that feel like cheap copies of pre-existing apps need to be banned! I, for one have had enough of my normal friends playing ruddy Fruit Ninja clones and asking me why it doesn’t look as good as it does on my phone!

There are shining examples of how stupendously done apps with a clear and fresh vision can go viral within days of conception. They are the intellectual property of individuals that have worked hard to develop not just the code for their apps, but the core concept as well. And we owe it to those striving developers to make sure that the integrity of that core concept remains preserved.
Yeah kind of like the lack of remotely interesting original posts on this forum, verses the viral like increase in nonsense that seems intended to do nothing but allow some forum users to boost their post count ....
__________________
"Dumb matter. If it's not running programs and
it isn't fusing atoms, ... then it's just bending space."
-----------------------
QWERTY for life MOFO's !!!!!!!!!!
-----------------------
Kit:
HTC Desire Z, Rooted, ROM=Miui (PS3 sixaxised, loaded with every emulator in known space)

2x PALM Treo 650, Unbranded, 4gb SD hack (backups, backups)

PDA
PALM T3 Unbranded, battery moded (What else am i gonna run Bhajis Loops & Microbe on)
 
melissaonthemove
Old
#3  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
I think the main problem with this fragmentation is that it is in the nature of Social Discovery apps that there is some uniformity in use. To be able to actually find people through it requires that a lot of people are using the same one.

Only people use them for different reasons and therefor there is an app for any of those reasons. Like some want to use them just to stay in touch with their friends and family, others to meet new people (like me when I am going to a new place) and than there is a group that uses them for flirting or organizing sexual encounters (I am not judging)

I think the best innovation for companies would be to invent an app that combines these functions. I haven't been able to find one.

If you know one, please let me know.
CSharpHeaven Old
#4  
Guest
Thanks Meter
Posts: n/a
Thank you, I enjoyed reading your view. I do share all your points other than the 'vision policing' part.

"In my opinion, authorities like Apple and Google should monitor the apps in their stores not just for quality, but for identity of vision as well."

If the vision could have been identified by the platform's creator then there wasn't a need for the App Store. The platform creator would have created every possibly visioned apps for its platform and not bother about the participation of thousands of developers on its ecosystem. Basically, to identify the visions one would restrict 'ideas' in which it does not go well with the creativity nature of mankind.
 
melissaonthemove
Old
#5  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 2
Join Date: Apr 2012
I found something on which you can have several profiles. So you can create one for every function you can have for a Social Discovery app. I think its sort of a good idea, because you don't need like ten thousants of profiles spread around over the net. Just use it however you want. I like that idea.

For me it's perfect because I always have a hard time remembering my passwords :P

It's called Evry'U. I found it through their facebook page that a friend linked me.

Did anybody heard of it?
Tags
android, apps, appstore, fragmentation
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes