Originally Posted by msm903

Naw I want a Samsung stock rom built for the ATT version also

Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA Premium App

Why? All they are are i9100 bases all mangled and bloated

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5

Originally Posted by raduque

And it looks like I'm still the only one who wants Samsung stock roms.

Hellraise something from the I9100 forums then - that's as stock as you're going to get.

Anything that comes from AT&T isn't stock, it's AT&T-mangled. Every AT&T release for this device has managed to be total **** with bugs not present in any I9100 release - data-eating AP Mobile widget in UCKH7, totally broken wifi power management in UCKK6.

Seriously - they couldn't even get Bluetooth HID right at all. Samsung made a /system change in November that required a kernel patch - XWKK5 and later included a compatible kernel, UCKK6 included an old kernel that wasn't compatible with the /system changes! Seriously, how the **** did that get past AT&T's supposed "quality control and testing" that they claim is the reason updates take forever?

Originally Posted by raduque

And it looks like I'm still the only one who wants Samsung stock roms.

Originally Posted by msm903

Naw I want a Samsung stock rom built for the ATT version also

Sent from my SGH-I777 using XDA Premium App

Make that three of us. People who like stock do exist, though we're in minority.

If you want a stable Samsung stock ICS ROM that was built and developed for I777, try ShishirROM (link in my signature). It's been awhile since he did anything with it, but it's still very stable, I use it as my daily. That's as close as you'll probably get to stock ICS here without Hellraising one yourself.

Originally Posted by Entropy512

Hellraise something from the I9100 forums then - that's as stock as you're going to get.

Anything that comes from AT&T isn't stock, it's AT&T-mangled. Every AT&T release for this device has managed to be total **** with bugs not present in any I9100 release - data-eating AP Mobile widget in UCKH7, totally broken wifi power management in UCKK6.

Seriously - they couldn't even get Bluetooth HID right at all. Samsung made a /system change in November that required a kernel patch - XWKK5 and later included a compatible kernel, UCKK6 included an old kernel that wasn't compatible with the /system changes! Seriously, how the **** did that get past AT&T's supposed "quality control and testing" that they claim is the reason updates take forever?

Entropy512, you must certainly find a channel to let at&t know, that saves thousands of customers. I once posted your link ( reg. wifi bug with the same ref. you posted above) during a chat with at&t rep!

I liked TW it was ALOT better then Motoblur. I just think its lame they kept the old Gingerbread icons for it on the ICS leaks. I want my ICS to look like ICS.

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Entropy512

Hellraise something from the I9100 forums then - that's as stock as you're going to get.

Anything that comes from AT&T isn't stock, it's AT&T-mangled. Every AT&T release for this device has managed to be total **** with bugs not present in any I9100 release - data-eating AP Mobile widget in UCKH7, totally broken wifi power management in UCKK6.

Seriously - they couldn't even get Bluetooth HID right at all. Samsung made a /system change in November that required a kernel patch - XWKK5 and later included a compatible kernel, UCKK6 included an old kernel that wasn't compatible with the /system changes! Seriously, how the **** did that get past AT&T's supposed "quality control and testing" that they claim is the reason updates take forever?

I don't use Bluetooth HID, so that's irrelevant. I understand it would be a problem for those who DO use it, but it's a non-issue to me. I've grown tired of constantly flashing this and that, trying to mix and match to find a combo of rom/kernel/modem that's stable.

I had no problems with any of the stock roms, except I didn't have root. That's the only reason I was running a community rom (Unnamed 2.1, I think). As well, for the longest time, I was running simply root with the shipping rom. I'm not even sure why I switched to Unnamed.

Originally Posted by raduque

I don't use Bluetooth HID, so that's irrelevant. I understand it would be a problem for those who DO use it, but it's a non-issue to me. I've grown tired of constantly flashing this and that, trying to mix and match to find a combo of rom/kernel/modem that's stable.

I had no problems with any of the stock roms, except I didn't have root. That's the only reason I was running a community rom (Unnamed 2.1, I think). As well, for the longest time, I was running simply root with the shipping rom. I'm not even sure why I switched to Unnamed.

Well, if you've already said that then you've made you life a whole lot easier.
Just waiting for AT&T officially releases their ROM, OTA, then use it.
You're on the safe side.
Also, root is root, you can root your device w/o installing any custom ROM.

I just want the OTA stock because the phone is going to another family member and I dont want it to have the WiFi bug. They also live 6 hours away so returning it to stock if I had another warranty issue wouldn't work either. Even Odin would be way too hard for them...

Originally Posted by votinh

Well, if you've already said that then you've made you life a whole lot easier.
Just waiting for AT&T officially releases their ROM, OTA, then use it.
You're on the safe side.
Also, root is root, you can root your device w/o installing any custom ROM.

Yeah, that's what I'm waiting for, the final rom release. Till then, I'll keep rockin' on with the LD3 leak using a good kernel.

It's just the sheer, massive, OVERWHELMING hate everybody has for anything that's not exact "pure" AOSP Android firmwares just fills my mind with FWAAAHHH

Originally Posted by raduque

Yeah, that's what I'm waiting for, the final rom release. Till then, I'll keep rockin' on with the LD3 leak using a good kernel.

It's just the sheer, massive, OVERWHELMING hate everybody has for anything that's not exact "pure" AOSP Android firmwares just fills my mind with FWAAAHHH

Because especially with ics, people are pissed that Samsung changed next to NOTHING about touchwiz to make it work with ics, which is already beautiful and fluid by itself

Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5