Introducing XDA:DevCon – A Conference For Developers By Developers
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?
 
Post Reply+
Tip us?
 
SlimJ87D
Old
#1  
SlimJ87D's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 356
Posts: 1,985
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default More evidence of US Variants getting a S4 Krait.

http://www.gsmarena.com/dualcore_sna...-news-4244.php
 
ceo.mtcl
Old
#2  
ceo.mtcl's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 362
Posts: 1,972
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: St. Paul, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimJ87D View Post
Att is getting the exynos quad-core version like Rogers.

Sent from my HTC One X on Leedroid's ROM v5.1.0.
Current Phones:
๑۩۞۩๑ Galaxy Note 2 I717 and Galaxy S3 I9300 ๑۩۞۩๑
Retired Phones: HTC One X (International) on AT&T <- Galaxy Nexus GSM <- HTC Vivid <- iPhone 4s <- AT&T SGS 2 <- Moto Atrix! <- iPhone 4 <- NEXUS S<- HTC HD2<- NEXUS ONE<- IPhone 3GS 16Gigs <- HTC Topaz (AT&T Pure) <- HTC Kaiser (AT&T Tilt)

Benefits of International Samsung Galaxy S3 for US (AT&T) users
 
snobrdr2324
Old
#3  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 11
Join Date: May 2012
This isn't a bad thing, but it is also underwhelming. Every high end phone released in the US markets has the same SoC. Software battles are not very interesting, at least to me. On ATT both of the high end Android phones are very similar in terms of hardware with the HTC One X arguably being better since it is already out and has a better screen. Not sure what samsung was thinking with putting out a phone with the same internals as a rival a couple months later.
 
SlimJ87D
Old
#4  
SlimJ87D's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 356
Posts: 1,985
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceo.mtcl View Post
Att is getting the exynos quad-core version like Rogers.

Sent from my HTC One X on Leedroid's ROM v5.1.0.
And who said that Rogers is getting an Exynoes version... the only evidence was a ad generated by google... unless you have another source.
 
BarryH_GEG
Old
#5  
BarryH_GEG's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 2795
Posts: 6,847
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spokane, Washington
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimJ87D View Post
And who said that Rogers is getting an Exynoes version... the only evidence was a ad generated by google... unless you have another source.
This ad banner...



Until something more concrete appears, I'm going with this from the article...

"Of course an ad banner is hardly conclusive"

http://www.androidcentral.com/ad-ban...s-chip-and-lte

From the New Orleans event. Note the use of the word "optimized."

“Samsung Mobile is planning a U.S. version of Galaxy S III, optimized for the fastest LTE and HSPA+ networks in the U.S., which will be available in the summer of 2012. Exact timing and retail channel availability is not being announced at this time. We believe the Galaxy S III is the most anticipated product in the 20-year history of Samsung Mobile; therefore, we will continue to share information as it becomes available.” – Samsung

This could play out two ways...

1) Samsung's developed a GSM LTE-capable version of the Exynos chip and it will be used everywhere it can be. In North America that would mean Rogers, AT&T, and Sprint. Since CDMA's so limited, the VZW SGS3 would likely use the S4 chip. T-Mobile would likely get S4 also because S4 supports AWS and when faced with the same choice in the SGS2 they went Qualcomm vs. developing their own AWS radio. If Samsung was going this route, there's no reason they wouldn't have said so at the UnBoxed event.

2) LTE and AWS SGS3's will all be S4. Either because Samsung didn't have time to integrate LTE, couldn't match the S4's fantastic battery life, or that it might actually be cheaper. Samsung builds great SoC's but they have no track record (yet) in radios. There were no repercussions (other than some customer disappointment) when Samsung went this route last time. Also, when they did, they waited until right up to launch to disclose that the U.S. market wasn't getting Exynos (except the non-LTE AT&T version).

I have no idea which way it'll go (and neither do any of you). I wouldn't bet odds in Vegas based on a misplaced banner ad.
The Following User Says Thank You to BarryH_GEG For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
bbeelzebub
Old
#6  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 56
Posts: 364
Join Date: May 2010
Location: El Lay / Hollyweird
If you think AT&T is going to fragment the sales/updates as far as one that is quad-core/hspa/3G and one that is Dual-Core/HSPA/LTE, you are mistaken. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.

There will be one model, one that is usable on the LTE network.
 
SlimJ87D
Old
#7  
SlimJ87D's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 356
Posts: 1,985
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbeelzebub View Post
If you think AT&T is going to fragment the sales/updates as far as one that is quad-core/hspa/3G and one that is Dual-Core/HSPA/LTE, you are mistaken. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.

There will be one model, one that is usable on the LTE network.
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
 
bbeelzebub
Old
#8  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 56
Posts: 364
Join Date: May 2010
Location: El Lay / Hollyweird
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimJ87D View Post
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
That was last year. We're into the LTE (True 4G) era.

Regardless. I'll have fun watching some of you waiting on that Quad Core.
 
SlimJ87D
Old
#9  
SlimJ87D's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 356
Posts: 1,985
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbeelzebub View Post
That was last year. We're into the LTE (True 4G) era.

Regardless. I'll have fun watching some of you waiting on that Quad Core.
Again, no evidence whatsoever that you will be getting a Exynos + 4G LTE radio with Verizon.
 
BarryH_GEG
Old
#10  
BarryH_GEG's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 2795
Posts: 6,847
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spokane, Washington
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimJ87D View Post
Yeah sure. Too bad that's not true with the SGS2 and the SGS2 Skyrocket....
That U.S. introduction of the SGS2 was one of the strangest launches ever. First, it took Samsung and the U.S. carriers six months after the UK launch to bring it to the U.S. Then all but the AT&T version were totally different phones based on the Asian Celox and SGS2's in name only. If you remember the launch event, the T-Mobile version was locked in a Plexiglas box and not allowed to be touched. VZW skipped the SGS2 entirely. On top of that, two weeks after it launched, AT&T announced the SkyRocket which was a Celox variant and closer to the other U.S. carrier versions. Samsung’s in a much more powerful position than they were last go round so hopefully the phones will be less molested and the introduction better synchronized.

When the OG SGS2 launched on AT&T they hadn't even lit up their first LTE city. It would be strange for them to launch another high-end HSPA+ phone with as fast as they are growing (and pushing) their LTE network. But, based on the SGS2 launch, anything's possible.

 
Post Reply+
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Go to top of page...

XDA PORTAL POSTS

Xposed Framework Module for the AT&T Galaxy S 4

Got yourself a brand new Galaxy S 4? Are you looking for some fun mods to make it truly your … more

Job Interview Prep: Phone Screen Part 1 – XDA Developer TV

XDA Developer TV Producer Jayce has been very busy creating videos to help … more

Auto Test Your Android Apps with Robotium

You’ve just finished coding your very first app, but before you release it to the wild, you … more

Open Source CPU Info App for Windows

So you’re playing with your shiny new Windows 8 tablet PC, when one of your like-minded geeky … more