Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

[All XDA Members] Feedback/Recommendations for XDA

OP Fallen Spartan

13th November 2012, 03:21 AM   |  #11  
sgt. slaughter's Avatar
Retired Forum Moderator
Flag Raleigh
Thanks Meter: 2,940
 
5,644 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2010
More
-gary

While I agree with some of what you have said I feel if you want strictly 100% development talk then that is reserved for the RD forum for RDs to have amongst themselves... Yes there are developers that are not RDs and to that I say they should apply to become RDs. There needs to be a place to allow users to provide feedback and suggestions on things that are developed.

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
13th November 2012, 04:13 AM   |  #12  
reinbeau's Avatar
Retired Forum Moderator
Flag South of Boston, MA
Thanks Meter: 4,692
 
7,373 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt. slaughter

-gary

While I agree with some of what you have said I feel if you want strictly 100% development talk then that is reserved for the RD forum for RDs to have amongst themselves... Yes there are developers that are not RDs and to that I say they should apply to become RDs. There needs to be a place to allow users to provide feedback and suggestions on things that are developed.

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

There is a place for that. The problem is there isn't a place for real development talk. Any real discussions get drowned out by inanity. I think with the influx of new people that noise to real development ratio has finally reached a tipping point. Then again, just how much input can Jon Q. Public have in development other than saying "I want this" or "How do I do that"? Those are user issues. We need to develop better developer solutions.
13th November 2012, 04:45 AM   |  #13  
sgt. slaughter's Avatar
Retired Forum Moderator
Flag Raleigh
Thanks Meter: 2,940
 
5,644 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by reinbeau

There is a place for that. The problem is there isn't a place for real development talk. Any real discussions get drowned out by inanity. I think with the influx of new people that noise to real development ratio has finally reached a tipping point. Then again, just how much input can Jon Q. Public have in development other than saying "I want this" or "How do I do that"? Those are user issues. We need to develop better developer solutions.

Hence my initial suggestion, that if you want 100% dev talk take up and use the RD forum and discuss in there...

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
13th November 2012, 04:53 AM   |  #14  
garyd9's Avatar
Recognized Developer
Flag Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks Meter: 2,164
 
2,083 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt. slaughter

Hence my initial suggestion, that if you want 100% dev talk take up and use the RD forum and discuss in there...

Xda DEVELOPERS. Why would a site called xda DEVELOPERS push development talk off into a corner, while non development talk reigns free?


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to garyd9 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
13th November 2012, 05:22 AM   |  #15  
sgt. slaughter's Avatar
Retired Forum Moderator
Flag Raleigh
Thanks Meter: 2,940
 
5,644 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyd9

Xda DEVELOPERS. Why would a site called xda DEVELOPERS push development talk off into a corner, while non development talk reigns free?


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2

Adapt with the times as things change.... Change and adjusting is tough at times but if done so correctly its for the better of all those involved...

It is absolutely impossible to have purely 100% code talk in the dev sections. The size of the userbase is way too large for the mod team to regulate that.

Hence the RDs section will be best if you want no nonsense dev talk.

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
The Following User Says Thank You to sgt. slaughter For This Useful Post: [ View ]
13th November 2012, 01:44 PM   |  #16  
garyd9's Avatar
Recognized Developer
Flag Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks Meter: 2,164
 
2,083 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt. slaughter

Adapt with the times as things change.... Change and adjusting is tough at times but if done so correctly its for the better of all those involved...
...
Hence the RDs section will be best if you want no nonsense dev talk.

You may be right, but I don't want to consider the possibility that XDA-Developers might become a non-developers forums. If your suggestion is carried out, I'd predict that it'd slowly (but surely) lose it's developer core and become more and more another "android central" or other generic handheld forum.

My reasoning is simple: XDA doesn't give birth to developers - they are born and bred before they get here. However, you're suggesting that they won't have a place to "talk shop" here unless and until they achieve RD status, which I'm assuming involves a certain application and requires that some projects have already been hawked here on XDA. I'm making some assumptions about RD here, but I think it'd be fairly safe to assume that a person can't submit a professional non-XDA resume to get it. As well, you are also always going to have some devs that simply refuse to "apply" for what they consider a "silly title." More especially those that see "ROM cooks" called RD and look the other way.

What is a real developer going to do in that case? Simple: find someplace else to talk shop.

(It's almost comical the way I talk about RD here. I've been doing professional dev for a very long, have given back to the android and ppc communities, and been an XDA member for a long time - but never bothered with RD status here when the program started. So, I honestly don't know what it might involve. I might be wrong about any type of requirements.)

I guess this question moves beyond my suggestions. I've been basing things on a developer-centric forum. That's what XDA-Developers was when I joined, and quite a few FAQ's we point users to indicate that it's still intended to be. If XDA is going to move away from that, then please disregard my suggestions.

Take care
Gary
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to garyd9 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
13th November 2012, 02:01 PM   |  #17  
reinbeau's Avatar
Retired Forum Moderator
Flag South of Boston, MA
Thanks Meter: 4,692
 
7,373 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgt. slaughter

Hence my initial suggestion, that if you want 100% dev talk take up and use the RD forum and discuss in there...

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Not everyone who develops is an RD - and why would you remove the ability for people to learn and share?

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyd9

Xda DEVELOPERS. Why would a site called xda DEVELOPERS push development talk off into a corner, while non development talk reigns free?


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2

Exactly.
The Following User Says Thank You to reinbeau For This Useful Post: [ View ]
13th November 2012, 03:39 PM   |  #18  
garyd9's Avatar
Recognized Developer
Flag Pittsburgh, PA
Thanks Meter: 2,164
 
2,083 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2006
It seems obvious that one specific issue that everyone agrees on is that *something* needs to be done to handle "developer discussion." While there are different opinions on the best way to do that, I haven't seen anyone post anything implying that dev's talking shop is a bad thing.

Fallen Spartan, perhaps this thread can branch that particular conversation to a separate thread? That would allow this thread to deal with the other issues without confusion.

Thanks
Gary
13th November 2012, 03:42 PM   |  #19  
Fallen Spartan's Avatar
OP Moderator Committee - Irish Pride, Spartan Legacy
Flag Belfast, Ireland Likes: Whiskey & XDA Dislikes: No whiskey
Thanks Meter: 4,479
 
10
23,116 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2007
Donate to Me
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyd9

It seems obvious that one specific issue that everyone agrees on is that *something* needs to be done to handle "developer discussion." While there are different opinions on the best way to do that, I haven't seen anyone post anything implying that dev's talking shop is a bad thing.

Fallen Spartan, perhaps this thread can branch that particular conversation to a separate thread? That would allow this thread to deal with the other issues without confusion.

Thanks
Gary

For the time being I'm inclined to let the discussion continue in this thread as there isn't much else being discussed here atm. If more idea's/recommendations appear, we can then create a new thread....if needed. Also, if a set way has been agreed on a particular idea/recommendation, I can create a second post updating users so its not lost within the thread
13th November 2012, 06:53 PM   |  #20  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 3
 
16 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2011
More
Lightbulb Making room for real developers again
Quote:
Originally Posted by reinbeau

Not everyone who develops is an RD - and why would you remove the ability for people to learn and share?

Exactly.

Hello,

I am one of those professional developers in real life, who don't have the time to play silly points games just to get access to the developer part of a forum. So my "XDA status" is stuck at "noob", but I am really here to look for a place to share technical discussion with other developers.

Looking around (I have been lurking for years now), I think the following improved structure would be a good idea:

In each area (General, OS, device) there should be 4 development subforums rather than the current 1 or 2:

1. Firmware and theme releases.
One thread for each firmware/theme series, hosting download links in the top 3 posts, and support discussions in the rest of the thread.
For instance the Android Samsung Galaxy III "Firmware and theme releases" forum would have exactly one "Cyanogenmod" thread and at most one "Cyanogenmod kang by temasek" thread.

Real cooks can post new threads and create the first two replies in their own thread. Non-noob users can post in existing threads after the 3. post in the thread.

2. Free App releases.
One thread for each free app, hosting download links in the top 3 ports, and support discussions in the rest of the thread.
For instance the Android Free App releases forum would have exactly one "ROM Manager" thread.

Real developers can post new threads and create the first two replies in their own thread. Non-noob users can post in existing threads after the 3. post in the thread.

3. Unreleased experiments
One thread for each unreleased firmware/theme/free app, hosting only discussion of what should go into it, difficulties in making it etc. When released the thread is moved to 1 or 2 as appropriate, at the thread OPs command.

Only real cooks and real developers can post here, there is a limit on new threads per user per month depending on the posters general standing.

4. Developer to Developer
This hosts regular forum style discussion threads where developers for that target (OS/phone) can ask each other questions about technical details for the target, one thread per subject matter, no threads about specific projects. This is the place to discuss stuff like ("Which wceload variants are in which upstream firmwares" in a WM forum or "How are the GPIO pins on the SoC connected to other parts of the phone (in a phone specific forum) or "How does the foo() API work" (in an OS forum)).

Only real cooks and real developers can post here.

Determining access:

Now as to determining the "real cook" and "real developer" status of a user, there could be a quiz and a number of extrinsic tests for each OS. Quiz questions would be multiple choice that a real cook/devel would answer easily, but a poser would get wrong. Other tests could be "prove that you have a developer account on Market/AppStore/OVI/Marketplace" "Show that you can sign an empty sis/cab/etc. with a valid developer certificate" Because getting a new certificate/account for some of the platforms may no longer be possible or may be otherwise restricted, such
tests would just count as N correct quiz answers in determining the pass/fail.

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jb_wisemo For This Useful Post: [ View ]
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes