Why did Verizon choose to disable Wireless Charging capability?

39 posts
Thanks Meter: 7
By Kevro_86, Member on 4th December 2012, 06:28 AM
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread
We all know that Verizon has made some pretty asinine decisons over the years, especially in regards to eliminating certain funtionality and features on their phones.... but for the life of me I cannot figure out why they would choose to essentially "cover up" the wireless charging capabilities of this great phone!

Do they actually NOT want to make a boatload of ca$h on special NFC/wireless charging battery covers and charging mats???!!!

There is no rationale behind this that I can think of whatsoever!

In case anyone wants to know the reason for my frustration... the Verizon version of the Note II has an inner cover that covers the wireless charging contacts (the inner cover is what is exposed when the battery cover is removed). The AT&T version has fully functional wireless charging capability out of the box...minus the battery cover & charging mat.

This problem can be remedied with a little tinkerinh which involves removing this inner cover, but the sad thing is that none of this extra work should even be necessary. Plus... wouldn't it have actually been more cost effective for Samsung & the carriers to use the same components wherever possible? This was an unnecessary variance from what should hve been the standard.

Just pretty crappy that this flagship device is missing this wireless charging feature that continues to grow in popularity industry wide.

...Maybe Verizon is counting on the micro-USB port life expectancy being just about when the warranty is expired so they can make their money on people needing new phones before they're due for an upgrade!

Sorry guys... had to vent. I definitely have a Love-Hate relationship with VZW!
4th December 2012, 10:17 AM |#2  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 2

wow no kidding
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gltovar For This Useful Post: [ View ]
4th December 2012, 11:22 AM |#3  
snapz54's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag los angeles
Thanks Meter: 60
Donate to Me
I was actually in the store to hear first hand why. A customer coming from an iphone (he announced) was interested in the Note 2. His friend had the ATT version and he was excited to have a phone that could do wireless charging.

customer: I want to get the note 2, does it come with the wireless charging accessories or do I have to buy them separate?
verizon salesguy: The Note 2 doesn't have wireless charging built in, but the New Droid DNA does, let me show you.
customer: okay!

word for word. So frustrating to see their evil BS work. They make money licensing the "DROID" name so they make more money from droid phones. Horse droppings.
4th December 2012, 12:05 PM |#4  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 418
To be fair doesn't it take about a decade to charge the note 2 wirelessly?
I don't like using 1a chargers on mine because they take so much longer than the stock one and as far as I know wireless charging supplies even less than that.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
4th December 2012, 01:29 PM |#5  
OP Member
Thanks Meter: 7
I never thought about the Droid DNA being a possible reason for them to intentionally disable this feature, but knowing how VZW likes to promote the Droid line as the preferred choice, that does make sense.

I agree that wireless charging a 3100mAh battery will take a lot longer. I would think most people would use it as a bedside charger while they're sleeping, or at work, if they have an office job.

It would be very convenient to not have to fumble with a micro USB connector, especially when lighting is poor, or when you're picking your phone up every several minutes while at work.

Sent from my VZW Galaxy Note II using xda app-developers app
4th December 2012, 01:56 PM |#6  
jyveturkey's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 39
Verizon has made it clear that the note is not their flagship device, but in fact the dna is.

Sent from my SPH-L900
4th December 2012, 02:04 PM |#7  
daddymatt's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Warner Robins, Georgia
Thanks Meter: 240
Donate to Me
I use wireless charging with my AT&T N2 and it charges from 40% in a couple hours.. I only charge at night when im sleeping though so as long as it charges within 6 hours I could care less.. and I wake up at the 4 hour mark and its at 100% so its fast enough for me... and slower charging is actually better for the battery. I understand if you needed a quick pick me up why it wouldnt be good.. but im a HEAVY user and with the N2 and its massive battery, ive never needed to charge it during the day... so for my needs, its perfect.

Sent from my AT&T Galaxy Note II /w wireless charging.
4th December 2012, 03:33 PM |#8  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 76
At the verizon I went to my rep tried the same thing on me. I went in specifically for the n2. He asked me if I had seen the dna, I said I heard of it and saw a couple of reviews on it. He asked if I wouod be interested in that instead. I said does it have a 3100mah battery, a stylus, removable battery or a micro sd slot... he said no. I said might as well get an iphone5 if thats the case. I came in for the n2 and only the n2.... couldnt be happier...... fyi. I finally convinced my wife to ditch her icrap5 and take over my s3

Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app
The Following User Says Thank You to justin94 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
4th December 2012, 03:57 PM |#9  
barry99705's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 140
Well that explains the extra time until they released it. I wonder if the contacts are still there under the plastic?

Also, why don't they put wireless chargers in dash mounts?? Seems like a no brainier there.
The Following User Says Thank You to barry99705 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
4th December 2012, 04:53 PM |#10  
OP Member
Thanks Meter: 7
There are a couple youtube videos showing what needs to be done to re-enable the wireless charging. The contacts are definitely there under the freaking plastic cover. They do not appear to be "raised" contacts like on the AT&T version or the Galaxy S3, but they are indeed there.
4th December 2012, 05:37 PM |#11  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 218
Sprint version does not have it either.

Maybe the cdma versions were built in the same place

swyped all these spelling errors from my galaxy note 2

Read More
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Guest Quick Reply (no urls or BBcode)
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes