Attend XDA's Second Annual Developer Conference, XDA:DevCon 2014!
5,729,749 Members 50,142 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum

[Firmware][GT-N7000][4.2.1] CyanogenMod 10.1 unofficial builds // discussion thread

Tip us?
 
Rakaan
Old
#551  
Rakaan's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1
Posts: 193
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Using latest nightly and can't seem to access my pictures taken by stock rom from my PC. I can see them via gallery within the rom but they are not visible when phone is connected to the PC.

Anyone can help please?
 
shoey63
Old
#552  
shoey63's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter 1297
Posts: 2,147
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somewhere in Oz...
Default Re: [Firmware][GT-N7000][4.2.1] CyanogenMod 10.1 unofficial builds // discussion thre

Is it true that flashing JB bootloaders can enhance performance? I'm on GB ones, (so I can use USB Jig if, and when required)

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
 
M3TALLICA
Old
#553  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 533
Posts: 1,503
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoey63 View Post
Is it true that flashing JB bootloaders can enhance performance? I'm on GB ones, (so I can use USB Jig if, and when required)

Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
AFAIK boot loaders have nothing to do with device performance.
The Following User Says Thank You to M3TALLICA For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
ventura21
Old
#554  
Member
Thanks Meter 10
Posts: 49
Join Date: Apr 2012
Angry What native features I lose?

Hello!

I swear I searched but did not find (maybe I did not know where to look)
But I would like to know which native functions on my Galaxy Note does not operate using the CM 10.1.
I know the HDMI output is one of them (at least it was a while ago).
I really like the Cyanogem roms, I use them since my LG Optimus One and would like to use it on my Note, but still wanted to know what does not work on my smartphone.

thank you!
 
LordManhattan
Old
#555  
LordManhattan's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 5646
Posts: 14,996
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kepler-34b
Quote:
Originally Posted by ventura21 View Post
Hello!

I swear I searched but did not find (maybe I did not know where to look)
But I would like to know which native functions on my Galaxy Note does not operate using the CM 10.1.
I know the HDMI output is one of them (at least it was a while ago).
I really like the Cyanogem roms, I use them since my LG Optimus One and would like to use it on my Note, but still wanted to know what does not work on my smartphone.

thank you!
Typical TouchWiz features doesn't (of obvious reasons) work. So the S-Pen works as a basic stylus, but the S-Pen features (tap and hold, button etc.) doesn't work. I'm not sure if MHL (HDMI) works. Basically every single TW feature doesn't work.
 
I DO NOT RUN A SUPPORT LINE THROUGH PERSONAL MESSAGES,
SO PLEASE DO NOT PM ME ABOUT HELP (*COUGH* UNLESS I KNOW YOU *COUGH*).

THANK YOU, AND PLEASE HAVE A COOKIE ON YOUR WAY OUT.


 
Rakaan
Old
#556  
Rakaan's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1
Posts: 193
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakaan View Post
Using latest nightly and can't seem to access my pictures taken by stock rom from my PC. I can see them via gallery within the rom but they are not visible when phone is connected to the PC.

Anyone can help please?
Could someone help me please? Thanks
 
cdmackay
Old
#557  
cdmackay's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 262
Posts: 818
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambridge, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakaan View Post
Could someone help me please? Thanks
What method are you trying, USB Mass Storage, or mtp/ptp? And have you checked the relevant USB bit in Settings?

It has been said that UMS is no longer supported, although it's there, and it works fine for some.

and when you say "can't see", how are you looking? i.e. are you looking in the right directory?

What OS on the PC?
 
Formhault
Old
#558  
Formhault's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 2825
Posts: 7,975
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: X-3043
Default Re: [Firmware][GT-N7000][4.2.1] CyanogenMod 10.1 unofficial builds // discussion thre

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoey63 View Post
Is it true that flashing JB bootloaders can enhance performance? I'm on GB ones, (so I can use USB Jig if, and when required)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boy124 View Post
AFAIK boot loaders have nothing to do with device performance.
Perhaps the new bootloader does a bit of repartitioning... Moving /preload to /system or /data?

Or maybe it locks the bootloader. Or fixes the eMMC bug?

Sent from my Galaxy Note held captive in Chasmodo's Asylum
Did my post entertain or help you? Do you hate me? Hit the THANKS button!



To all my haters
 
 
M3TALLICA
Old
#559  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 533
Posts: 1,503
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Formhault View Post
Perhaps the new bootloader does a bit of repartitioning... Moving /preload to /system or /data?

Or maybe it locks the bootloader. Or fixes the eMMC bug?

Sent from my Galaxy Note held captive in Chasmodo's Asylum
Boot loaders have nothing to do with the emmc brick bug either.

-------

Forgive me Team CyanogenMod for I sinned again.
Had brief affair with the latest stock Samsung firmware > only thing that I found useful is 50 GB dropbox for two years for free!
 
Formhault
Old
(Last edited by Formhault; 19th February 2013 at 08:31 AM.)
#560  
Formhault's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 2825
Posts: 7,975
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: X-3043
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boy124 View Post
Boot loaders have nothing to do with the emmc brick bug either.
I'm just speculating. Anyway, there has to be something new/improved in the new bootloader... Samsung doesn't like to spend work on something useless (like, say, a fix for the black clipping, which would be completely useless, of course).

With HTC, on some devices you can't run newer ROMs without upgrading the bootloader. For example, the HTC Desire S with bootloader 2.00 just doesn't boot Android 2.3.x, while with bootloader 1.xx, nothing else except for Android 2.3.x.

So... there has to be something in this new bootloader, something that, if it's missing, functionality decays or something. Sadly, I can't find any refference of this new bootloader anywhere on the Internet... was hoping to see someone who actually tried it and saw significant improvement in a way or something... Until we're proven we need to upgrade, I don't think new bootloader flash needs to be considered.
Did my post entertain or help you? Do you hate me? Hit the THANKS button!



To all my haters
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes