FORUMS

XDA Recap: This Week In Android (Apr 18 – 25)

Here in the digital XDA newsroom, we spend our days pouring over an average of … more

Sunday Debate: Custom ROMs vs. Modular Tweaks

Join us in a fun Sunday Debate on Mods and ROMs. Come with your opinions and feel free to … more

AOSP 5.1 Lollipop for Nexus Q

Google Nexus Q is an intriguing device released with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. It was abandoned by … more

XDA Picks: Best Apps of the Week (Apr 17 – 24)

Apps are at the front and center of any smartphone experience, and with over a … more
Thread Closed Subscribe to Thread Email Thread

|KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP>>6.8 || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|25

16th February 2013, 05:52 PM |#21  
BlackPhantomX's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 101
 
More
Did the ability to change the voltage disappear...?
 
 
17th February 2013, 01:07 AM |#22  
Senior Member
Flag Montreal
Thanks Meter: 36
 
More
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15
Does this support 64gb sdcard? I've been looking for a kernel for 64gb aosp for the longest time.

Sent from my SGH-I317M using xda app-developers app
17th February 2013, 06:41 AM |#23  
Senior Member
ON, Canada
Thanks Meter: 127
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackPhantomX

Did the ability to change the voltage disappear...?

Same here, running the latest nightly (2/16) CM10.1

Ant chance of GPU OCing?
17th February 2013, 04:48 PM |#24  
brosenz's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag US
Thanks Meter: 48
 
More
I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"
17th February 2013, 05:02 PM |#25  
appdroid's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Chicago
Thanks Meter: 4,319
 
Donate to Me
More
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15
Quote:
Originally Posted by andronikal659

Does this support 64gb sdcard? I've been looking for a kernel for 64gb aosp for the longest time.

Sent from my SGH-I317M using xda app-developers app

Yes It does. At least for me

Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
17th February 2013, 05:06 PM |#26  
wase4711's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Outside of Chicago
Thanks Meter: 4,738
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by brosenz

I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"

Yes, caring about benchmarks is just "wrong"..absolutely meaningless information..
The Following User Says Thank You to wase4711 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
17th February 2013, 07:11 PM |#27  
digitalcrash's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Mount Airy
Thanks Meter: 54
 
More
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15
Quote:
Originally Posted by brosenz

I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"

It is also known that quad scores on 4.1.2 are higher than 4.2 but that doesn't mean anything.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
18th February 2013, 02:59 AM |#28  
Cab121's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Dallas
Thanks Meter: 198
 
More
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15
Extreme battery life, enlightened cpu performance, otherworldly multitasking capacity and stability these are the ways of master ptmr3 and the Force.

Quadrant scoring without proper OS, no control benching, inaccurate data or no logging with version changes, or even rom version pre testing vs kernel lead down the dark path.

If you feel it's slower then please help with your opinion. Post hard data current detailed stats with rom information and versions apps and so on. With out data to compare all that gets posted is a wasted opinion in a development thread.

Thanks for the great work! Or work of greatness?
Last edited by Cab121; 18th February 2013 at 03:06 AM.
18th February 2013, 03:10 AM |#29  
Account currently disabled
Flag Newark, NJ
Thanks Meter: 5,476
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackPhantomX

I'm sure you'll get to these features, but my requests would be the USB (and hopefully wireless) charging capabilities to be bumped up to 900mA or higher, and of course the ability to overclock GPU.

I upped charging on my ROMs to 900mA. I use a wireless charger and was tired of how slow it use to be.
18th February 2013, 04:14 AM |#30  
ptmr3's Avatar
OP Recognized Developer / Contributor
Flag Aurora
Thanks Meter: 20,885
 
Donate to Me
More
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManelScout4Life

I upped charging on my ROMs to 900mA. I use a wireless charger and was tired of how slow it use to be.

Implemented here as well
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ptmr3 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
Thread Closed Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes