[Recovery] Flashable Ones!!! - CWM - TWRP - Stock

---

Here are the latest CWM and TWRP ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1809307) recoveries are all flashable from recovery itself, use these to swap back and forth or just because you are bored...

These were/have been previously posted over in sprint apps section, but I keep seeing people posting questions about need this one or that...so here they are for T-Mo.


Thanks goes to the original developers for these, and for the sharing and caring..

TWRP 2.4.2.0 - http://d-h.st/iMc

TWRP 2.4.1.0 - http://d-h.st/9cL

CWM 6.0.2.3 - http://d-h.st/jbT

CWM Touch 6.0.2.3 - http://d-h.st/8A9

Stock ... http://d-h.st/TzP

Thanks for the thread. People always make these then never keep them up to date, so it's nice to have a current one. I guess they got different devices or stopped caring It's nice to have them all in one place.

One question, though. I notice you didn't tag the files with d2tmo. I know that d2spr recoveries work on this device, but wouldn't there be some assert problems on any zip that tries to verify the device before a flash?

Re: [Recovery] Flashable

---

Originally Posted by Aerowinder

Thanks for the thread. People always make these then never keep them up to date, so it's nice to have a current one. I guess they got different devices or stopped caring It's nice to have them all in one place.

One question, though. I notice you didn't tag the files with d2tmo. I know that d2spr recoveries work on this device, but wouldn't there be some assert problems on any zip that tries to verify the device before a flash?

Not that I am aware of. They are sprint branded, but identical versions.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

The md5s don't match:
b6bf09d9afbbb5611a8173dd3bf453fb *recovery-clockwork-touch-6.0.2.3-d2spr.img
aff9411791f857c98c2538cb809348b8 *recovery-clockwork-touch-6.0.2.3-d2tmo.img

How can assert(getprop("ro.product.device") == "d2tmo" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "d2tmo"); possibly pass if using a d2spr recovery? Does that command only work if an OS is installed?

Understand, that I'm not necessarily saying that you are incorrect, but it just doesn't add up to me.

Re: [Recovery] Flashable

---

Originally Posted by Aerowinder

The md5s don't match:
b6bf09d9afbbb5611a8173dd3bf453fb *recovery-clockwork-touch-6.0.2.3-d2spr.img
aff9411791f857c98c2538cb809348b8 *recovery-clockwork-touch-6.0.2.3-d2tmo.img

How can assert(getprop("ro.product.device") == "d2tmo" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "d2tmo"); possibly pass if using a d2spr recovery? Does that command only work if an OS is installed?

Understand, that I'm not necessarily saying that you are incorrect, but it just doesn't add up to me.

then dont use it...use the flashable as a template to make your own...

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

I made my own months ago, I have tars in my sig and zips in my DropBox (which I've linked several times). You seem to have taken offense at my questions, when I clearly pointed out I didn't want you to interpret them that way. My questioning was merely a vain attempt to learn something new. Not to tear you down, but for me to become more knowledgeable about a subject from someone who clearly knows more about Android than I do.

So, is it safe to flash these?

Re: [Recovery] Flashable Ones!!! - CWM - TWRP - Stock

---

I could of used you yesterday. I was literally scouring yesterday looking for a flashable recovery. Ended up using adb and Odin to flash something.. Thx for this post.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

Originally Posted by fasteddie5

So, is it safe to flash these?

the CWM are for your phone. TWRP are for all GS III's...I would not have posted these here if they did not work.

OP updated with specific T-Mo builds so that md5 checks will alleviate anxieties...

I tested both CWM Touch and TWRP myself this morning (latest versions for both). d2spr recoveries (the ones originally posted) absolutely fail the d2tmo assert check (for any zip that includes it).

As of 2012-02-17, 10:50AM EST:
The CWM Touch link is good (it was edited since my last post). Did not test CWM non-touch. Not sure why anyone would use it.
The TWRP 2.4.1.0 link is bad. This is still the d2spr version. Safe to assume the older versions are as well.
Stock recovery link is also bad.

Do not flash recoveries that are not for the T999.