Cyngn, OnePlus, Micromax – The Legal Battle

Recently, a battle has been waging in India over the rights to distribute the commercial … more

Lean Mean Battery Power Saving App Review

We talk a lot about battery topics here at XDA TV. We talk about everything from Power Banks to USB … more

Android 5.1 Possibly Coming February 2015

Google released Android 5.0 just over a month ago, and since then Lollipop has been trying to … more

Double Tap to Wake on the Nexus 6 Without Root

A few weeks ago, we featured an app which allowed the Nexus 6 to regain the double tap to wake … more

Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Thread Deleted

Wizard or Universal?

OP tikkel

15th October 2005, 10:47 AM   |  #1  
tikkel's Avatar
OP Senior Member
BREDA
Thanks Meter: 2
 
122 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2004
Which one is better? The Universal or the Wizard? I now use the MDA III/Qtek 9090...

The processor and memory from the Wizard is less then the MDA III. But will that have an effect on the working of te device?
Kensai
15th October 2005, 11:50 AM   |  #2  
Guest
Thanks Meter: 0
 
n/a posts
Less is more in our case. Everyone using the HTC Wizard has said the OMAP850 is rather speedy. Don't worry about the lower frequency, but party about the extended autonomy!

Your question is a little bit biased since you're in the Wizard section of the fora and I've just ordered my Wizard ( :twisted: ) so I guess I'll suggest you buy Wizard as well unless you are serious about making use of the extra features of the Universal (UMTS, videocalls, and the bigger screen).
15th October 2005, 12:14 PM   |  #3  
tikkel's Avatar
OP Senior Member
BREDA
Thanks Meter: 2
 
122 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2004
Tnx for you quick respons. So the difference in process speed Wizard - Universal: 200 / 400 and the difference in memory: 64 and 128 isn't a big problem for you?

Is the device crashing often/frequently? Do you have to wait a long time when starting programs or opening files?

This is my experience with my Qtek 9090 after installing win05 on it.
15th October 2005, 12:47 PM   |  #4  
Member
Thanks Meter: 1
 
37 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2005
I would get a wizard too! I tried to put a universal in my pocket and felt like a had a wallet with 200 euro inside it.
Wizard is speedy indeed. I dont think its any slower then my magician, after modding the extended rom.

On both devices you got a keyboard and wifi, but wizard is nice and small.


Ik zou dus de wizard nemen
15th October 2005, 02:02 PM   |  #5  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
20 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2005
make a 2k5 rom for wizard and i'll buy it. w/o persistent storage for wizard, i think universal is better. just my opinion.
15th October 2005, 03:51 PM   |  #6  
chakra's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 441
 
1,715 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2005
the memory is the same on both devices
17th October 2005, 11:48 PM   |  #7  
tikkel's Avatar
OP Senior Member
BREDA
Thanks Meter: 2
 
122 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2004
What do you mean? There is a difference: Processor: 200 / 400
Memory: 128 / 64?
18th October 2005, 01:16 AM   |  #8  
Senior Member
Flag Biggleswade
Thanks Meter: 61
 
233 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2005
More
No, the JASJAR has 128MiB ROM/ 64MiB RAM. The K-JAM has 128MiB ROM/ 64MiB RAM.

The only difference is the processor, and since they are different technologies (I want to say different architectures, but thats not the correct word)... you cant compare them on clock speed alone.
18th October 2005, 01:43 AM   |  #9  
BeyondtheTech's Avatar
Senior Member
New Jersey
Thanks Meter: 2
 
452 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2005
JASJAR and K-JAM both have the same ROM and RAM capacity. The JASJAR runs on an Intel XScale processor at 520MHz, a single-core CPU. The K-JAM runs on a TI OMAP 850 processor at 195MHz, a multi-core CPU. It has been proven (and based on firsthand experience) that the K-JAM performs on par with a 400MHz XScale CPU on many tasks, since the processor's focus is on power, not speed.

There is a moderate size difference, too. Some will say it's not much, while others will say it's a big difference. Those who are very much on-the-go will appreciate the smaller screen and lighter weight (160g) of the K-JAM, versus the larger screen and heavier weight (280g?).

Lastly, depending on your region of the world, you might appreciate the JASJAR's UMTS technology and 900MHz support, both of which are not supported in the United States. If you live in the US, the K-JAM's 850MHz support and EDGE technology make it a great unit to have.

Did I mention that the JASJAR is big?

18th October 2005, 10:40 AM   |  #10  
tikkel's Avatar
OP Senior Member
BREDA
Thanks Meter: 2
 
122 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2004
Tnx for the answer. Now I know the real difference...

Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes