Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread

Info 2 [i9000] Launcher ram usage comparison

13th January 2014, 09:19 PM   |  #1  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 36
 
190 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
Donate to Me
More
Hi,

You will find below a comparison chart about some common launchers including ram usage.

Test where done as follow:

Device: gt-i9000 (not inand version, the old one, but still working fine)
Rom: Android Kit-Kat 4.4 CyanAOSP http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=2542131

Procedure:
Launcher is installed, and selected.
Phone is rebooted.
Ram consumption is mesured.
Some widgets and apps are launched.
Ram consumption is mesured.
Launcher is uninstalled, an other one is installed and phone gets rebooted again.

This is only used to check ram usage, no discussion will be permitted about funtionality or "best launcher" type.

Feel free to use, or improve test.

Regards.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...Gc&output=html

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...Gc&usp=sharing

HTML Code:
Name	Low (in Mo)	High (in Mo)	Max (in Mo)	version	link	installed size (in Mo)
360 Launcher	55	60	105	5.4.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.qihoo360.launcher	12.9
Ace Launcher	57	58	80	1.0.6	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.doodleapp.launcher	10.8
Action Launcher	57	58	73	2.0.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.actionlauncher.playstore	5.8
ADW Launcher	60	62	95	1.3.3.9	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.adw.launcher	3.5
Apex Launcher	42	43	68	2.2.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.anddoes.launcher	3.9
Atom Launcher	64	68	91	1.6.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dlto.atom.launcher	9.9
Buzz Launcher	74	75	117	1.1.0.7	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.buzzpia.aqua.launcher	18.7
Dodol Launcher	61	63	97	1.1.1563	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.campmobile.launcher	11.7
Epic Launcher	46	51	77	1.1.4	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.epic.launcher	1.9
Espier Launcher	38	39	45	3.6.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mobi.espier.launcher6	9.1
EZ Launcher	51	59	66	0.5.2	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=mobi.infolife.launcher2	4.3
Go Launcher Ex	60	62	90	4.11	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gau.go.launcherex	18.4
Holo Launcher	45	51	63	2.1.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mobint.hololauncher	1.5
KitKat Launcher	55	66	84	1.5	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ovidos.android.kitkat.launcher3	18
KitKat Launcher+	53	54	82	1.1.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=nl.ndsc.kitkatlauncher	2.4
KK Launcher	56	66	87	2.8	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kk.launcher	7.6
Themer Beta	73	74	113	1.27	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mycolorscreen.themer	19.1
FTL Launcher Lite	39	45	61	3.1.5	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lowveld.ftllauncherlite	1
Launcher8 free	61	64	76	1.6.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lx.launcher8	9.1
Lightning Launcher	46	48	61	9.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.pierrox.lightning_launcher	0.7
Mi Home	n/a (crash)	n/a (crash)	n/a (crash)	2.18.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.miui.mihome2	9.3
Mini Launcher	59	64	94	2.01	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jiubang.go.mini.launcher	4.2
MoboLive	38	40	43	5.0.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nd.android.launcher91	15
Nemus Launcher	43	56	69	1.6.5.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nemustech.launcher	3.3
Next Launcher 3D Lite	100	108	155	3.01.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gtp.nextlauncher.trial	22.4
Nova Launcher	52	58	77	2.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.teslacoilsw.launcher	5.2
Perfect Launcher	47	57	86	1.1.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pk.com.android.launcher	4.9
Regina 3D Launcher	74	76	95	1.2.0	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nemustech.regina	4.2
SF Launcher	48	60	77	0.4.5	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.alamoapps.launcher	8.4
Smart Launcher	45	50	60	1.12.11	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ginlemon.flowerfree	2.3
Turbo Launcher	46	52	73	0.0.17	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.phonemetra.turbo.launcher	3.2
Vire Launcher	105	117	114	1.8.9.0.3	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.vire.launcher	10.2
Windows8	72	76	83	2.2.1	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jss.android.windows8	13.3
Zeam	44	50	66	3.1.10	https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.zeam	0.7
Launcher3	46	61	77	4.4-56	http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2542131	0.8
Google Experience Launcher (without google search about 40Mo too)	60	62	88	0.10.1	http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2529594	11.8
(if a mod comes by and want to reformat this I will be gladful)
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to franklin01 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
8th July 2014, 08:27 PM   |  #2  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
9 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2011
Hi! Could You explain the different columns?
Last edited by StormSodat; 8th July 2014 at 08:34 PM.
5th August 2014, 11:01 PM   |  #3  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 9
 
146 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2013
I would LOVE to see this post updated and maintained as i've referenced it many times for its great info!
7th August 2014, 03:51 PM   |  #4  
TLH11's Avatar
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 1
 
12 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2012
More
Thumbs up Nice!
Nice work! Ill keep Nova :B
10th August 2014, 02:16 PM   |  #5  
CedricAndroidlover's Avatar
Member
Thanks Meter: 13
 
57 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2013
More
You done well by testing so many launchers. Update the headings in excel sheet pls. Can't guess what the numbers are.

Sent from my XT1033
18th September 2014, 08:34 PM   |  #6  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 2
 
19 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2013
More
Hi, very nice post / job!! Exactly what I was searching for...

Both spreadsheets contain errors. The good values are here, in the original post. Example: Lightining Launcher Low value 105 instead of 46).

Thank you so much for these tests !
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes