Post Reply

Tripping Knox for root?

9th May 2014, 08:18 PM   |  #1  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 11
 
255 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2011
I constantly hear that the reason an exploit is tough to find is because people don't want to set off the Knox. If Knox is tripped, would the phone still work? I'm sure I'm not the only one who is fine with voiding warranty if it means we can get rid of all this bloatware

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using XDA Free mobile app
9th May 2014, 08:23 PM   |  #2  
TOA Duck's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Mississippi
Thanks Meter: 135
 
756 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxo

I constantly hear that the reason an exploit is tough to find is because people don't want to set off the Knox. If Knox is tripped, would the phone still work? I'm sure I'm not the only one who is fine with voiding warranty if it means we can get rid of all this bloatware

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using XDA Free mobile app

You have been mis informed. An exploit has not been found at all. If it is, Knox will more than likely be tripped.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk
10th May 2014, 10:32 AM   |  #3  
Alarand's Avatar
Member
Thanks Meter: 6
 
30 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2013
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxo

I constantly hear that the reason an exploit is tough to find is because people don't want to set off the Knox. If Knox is tripped, would the phone still work? I'm sure I'm not the only one who is fine with voiding warranty if it means we can get rid of all this bloatware

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using XDA Free mobile app

If you "trip" knox in the sense that you're talking about, by flashing anything that isn't the official att firmware, your phone won't boot. (bootloader lock)

I believe there's a counter that gets tripped when you successfully flash a custom rom so samsung can tell if your warranty is void or not, this isn't what the issue with finding root is however, it's the first part.

Also, the reason why it's so difficult to find an exploit is because att/verizon pay samsung and samsung pays various other parties, likely a lot more than $12,000 (the bounty), to ensure that said exploits are not found and that the device will remain locked.

I don't know why att doesn't offer an unlock service for like 100$ they would make an absolute killing.
Last edited by Alarand; 10th May 2014 at 10:47 AM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Alarand For This Useful Post: [ View ]
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Top Threads in AT&T Galaxy S5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting by ThreadRank