New: XDA launches forum for app developers. Discuss coding, tools, marketing, and more.
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?
 
Post Reply+
Tip us?
 
Dr.Sid
Old
#1  
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 5
Posts: 657
Join Date: Nov 2008
Default Non square pixels ?

I've noticed that Leo is somewhat wide, and still it has same resolution as other phones.

It has resolution 480x800, which is width=0.6 * height.
That huge Russian review states that Leo has display dimensions 88x56 mm. That makes it 0.63 * height. Which would mean the pixels are not square, it is 5% wider.
That is not much and it would be hardly noticeable. But if you rotate the screen, it will be 5% in other direction, and the difference would be 10%.

Question is .. is it noticeable ?

At least it should be measurable. If you have Leo, could you recheck my theory ? Display perfect circle or square (such bitmap should be easy to make on PC), and use ruler to measure the width and height on Leo's display. Also try that in landscape mode.

If indeed the pixels are not square, I'm interested how is it noticeable. Especially on people it should be visible, especially if you switch from landscape to portrait and back. On portrait all should be wider, on landscape all should be thinner.
 
NetDwarf
Old
(Last edited by NetDwarf; 11th November 2009 at 09:18 PM.)
#2  
Member
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 36
Join Date: May 2008
88x56 cant be correct cause it is not 5:3 and this also imply a 4,1" display and not a 4,3" one ^^. Conclusion: The values arent correct . The pixel are squared.
 
bemymonkey
Old
#3  
bemymonkey's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 95
Posts: 2,324
Join Date: Aug 2007
It's probably not that noticable, or rather doesn't matter as soon as you get used to it. The pixels on my laptop (Thinkpad SL500) aren't square either, but as soon as you get used to it it's no problem
 
Dr.Sid
Old
#4  
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 5
Posts: 657
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by NetDwarf View Post
88x56 cant be correct cause it is not 5:3 and this also imply a 4,1" display and not a 4,3" one ^^. Conclusion: The values arent correct . The pixel are squared.
Good point. Still .. what is the real display size ?
Leo surely seems wider aspect ratio then my current Xperia, which has the same resolution, and perfect 0.6 ratio.
 
Dr.Sid
Old
#5  
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 5
Posts: 657
Join Date: Nov 2008
I searched for some pictures on google and measured the aspect ratio on them, and it looks ok. So the impression comes probably just from the fact that Leo does not have hardware keys and the part above display is quite short too.

Good ! Eh .. now I simply HAVE to buy it, right ?
 
here4info
Old
#6  
Member
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 88
Join Date: Jul 2007
to be 4.3in diagonal (109.22mm) AND be square pixel at 800x480 the lcd size has to be 93.65mm X 56mm.

Is is that? i don't know, but it would fit in the frame reported at 120.5mm x 67mm.

 
Svenvdmeer
Old
#7  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 10
Posts: 174
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rotterdam
I just held a ruler next to my screen and measured the screen. The size is 56x94. The are approximate sizes no exact measurements...
 
Dr.Sid
Old
#8  
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 5
Posts: 657
Join Date: Nov 2008
Thanx, that makes this non-issue.


XDA PORTAL POSTS

Pearl Chen to Talk NFC Development at XDA:DevCon 2013

From HTML to LEDs or Android to Arduino, Hardware Hacking is a pastime of many people … more

Avoid Framework Bootloops on Xperias Running Jelly Bean

If you’re a Sony device owner running a stock Android Jelly Bean firmware and … more

Forum Added for the Samsung Galaxy Mega

What do you do when the Galaxy Note line is simply not big enough? You get theSamsung Galaxy Mega. … more

Voice Control Your Phone with Tasker and AutoVoice – XDA Developer TV

XDA Developer TV Producer Kevin set up his phone to respond to … more