Dr.Ketan Brings The S6 Theme Store To The Note 4

Dr.Ketan has submitted a video to the forums showing a functional port of the Galaxy S6 … more

Do You Have Insurance on Your Smartphone?

While affordable smartphones are becoming more available, the majority of high-end flagships … more

Apple Music Will Increase iTunes Match to 100,000 Songs

The battle for music streaming subscription dominance is starting to really heat … more

Xposed Framework Updated to v65

Xposed Framework is an extremely popular modification platform for Android, so much so that we included … more

defy's cpu - the final answer

508 posts
Thanks Meter: 605
By xdaid, Recognized Developer on 1st December 2010, 12:03 AM
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread
Finally we have an official response from Motorola.

I'm quite surprised but it's true, defy is equipped with omap3610.

BUT also, it has been confirmed that defy has a PowerVR SGX 530 renderer inside.


What's your opinion? Why an omap3610 + separate graphic renderer instead of omap3630 (which has the same renderer inside)?

Like i said i'm quite surprised, i was pretty sure the defy's core was 3630. But in my opinion what really matters is the graphic renderer, and it is present!
1st December 2010, 12:14 AM |#2  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
I can only assume it was cheaper to buy and/or productize the two separate chips as opposed to the 3630.
1st December 2010, 12:33 AM |#3  
Flag Seoul
Thanks Meter: 4
i can' believe that answer......
'omap3610 + separate graphic renderer' is cheaper than omap 3630 ??
is it possible?
1st December 2010, 12:52 AM |#4  
Nannuq's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 69
Actually one can Believe that do to Yield when producing the product. Its the same thing with multi-core chips. Putting 2 dual core chips into a CPU is cheaper in the long run than putting 1 quad core because of flaws in the Production of the cores. don't believe me look it up. It could have been a deal brokered to Motorola because of excess yield of a chip made it cheaper to buy them in massive quantity. Shortages of the chip you mentioned but availability of the 2 chip combo could have been another cause.
Last edited by Nannuq; 1st December 2010 at 12:54 AM.
1st December 2010, 01:27 AM |#5  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 70
Well.. this is shaping up to be interesting.

I've heard this thing benchmarks like a beast.. so it will be interesting to see what happens with froyo..

It does make sense instead of an SoC like hummingbird they could have two dedicated chips.. I would imagine with SoC's they run into a lot of potential problems.. if one part on the chip is bad whole chip is bad..

Although it would be funny if they manage to shove an old 8800 into there somehow..
1st December 2010, 06:47 AM |#6  
Senior Member
Flag Shanghai
Thanks Meter: 51
I think MOTO didn't tell the truth!
1st December 2010, 07:25 AM |#7  
inteks's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 750
Donate to Me
you wont hear that but ....

the 3610 doesnt has an ISP (Image Signal Processor) !!!

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	3610 features.JPG
Views:	6249
Size:	39.9 KB
ID:	453531  
1st December 2010, 07:54 AM |#8  
inteks's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 750
Donate to Me
3630 has 3D and IVA 2+
IVA 2+ accelerator enables multistandard
(MPEG-4, H.264) encode/
decode and WMV9 encode at D1
(720 x 480 pixels), 30 fps
Up to 720p HD resolution
3620 has IVA AND 3D
3610 has IVA
IVA 2 accelerator enables 
VGA to DVD video content playback 
up to XGA/WXGA display resolutions
so defy cpu/gpu combo is more like 3620

1st December 2010, 07:55 AM |#9  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
That only affects camera picture quality. Phone cams are useless anyway.
1st December 2010, 09:05 AM |#10  
Higgsy's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Smethvegas
Thanks Meter: 645
I don't believe it.

Everything I have ever plugged the phone into/bench mark tools are telling me its a 3630, including RSD Lite. Nothing has ever told me its a 3610.

My personal opinion, is that Motorola don't want to advertise that it has this CPU as the phone is much cheaper than its "higher end" models and they don't want everyone going out and buying the defy over say the Droid X or Droid 2.

Whatever its got the bench mark results of this phone are awsome - and its on 2.1.
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes