Quote:
Originally Posted by existz
thank you so much for this...been looking for something exactly like this, and seems sleep death is gone
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcrews
darky 7.0.1 here also.
I had it charge around an hr and a half past 100% and no death!
So we'll see how it does overnight
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcrews
Well no charge death for me last night...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hamburgertrain
Absolutely no problem, left on ac all night with an undervolt and everything. Great job with this, it made oc/uv usable for me.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattern1974
I found your thread last night after a long and happy Christmas day with the family. Followed your instructions to the letter. Charged overnight from 45% and woke up to find the phone operating fine. This might be the answer to all our prayers!! Thank you so much!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Athailias
Ive been charging since 2pm yesterday and its still on. I think you got the fix 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rootnik
No problems here charging overnight. For those who care about quadrant scores, mine was about 250 points higher than the other 1.2ghz kernel I was using.
|
* Crosses fingers...*. Looks like this is the real deal finally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dani897
Runs great with eugenes ginger clone. Slightly better benchmarks than other rom/kernel combos. I peak out at 1.3ghz so 1.2 seems like a good medium. One request though is to look into changing the divider for the gpu. I know we don't need it but its good for bragging. Unhelpful had this and I could set the gpu down to 166.750 For lower clocks to save battery and up to 222.334 (stable) for benchmarks. I never tried other clocks so I don't know if it would work on other settings. It depends on how his code works. but it seems by my math the gpu is divided off a 2000 or 2001mhz frequency. There is a margin of error I guess. and stock is divided by 10. In unhelpfuls code it is divided by 9 (222.334) default but could be set to 10 or 12. If we bump that up to 15 or 20 we might reduce battery consumtion with a gpu clock at 133 or even 100mhz. Id also like to try the divider at 8 for 250mhz. Im curious as to how that would benchmark if its stable.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk
|
Ehhmm...well for one, I'm not in the same league as Unhelpful. I don't really know him, but, if I had to come up with an analogy, it would be something along the lines of Unhelpful being a MLB All-Star, and I'm more like a mentally challenged kid playing t-ball.  Joking aside though, I haven't looked at the voltage levels for the GPU, but off the top of my head, I don't think there would be much to gain in terms of battery life, which is really what I'm after. I might take a look though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarlowXim
Gb great work. There is a measurable speed difference and so far haven't had any charging issues as of yet.
Could you post your source code? I'm interested in making a few personal modifications to the kernel.
|
Yes, of course. I'm still tweaking a few things on some newer kernels, which I haven't released, and I want to make sure this is completely sound first, and then I plan on releasing a user optimizable kernel with config wrappers for various tweaks, ie, if you want to overclock, you set the config for it, if you want TinyRCU, you can set the config for it and make your own kernel. Although, by the time I get that done, we may all be on Gingerbread.
|