Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

Multiloader 5.65

OP xator91

2nd February 2011, 11:09 PM   |  #1  
xator91's Avatar
OP Recognized Themer
Flag Palermo
Thanks Meter: 597
 
692 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
Donate to Me
More
New version of multiloader v5.65, this version is improved Test It

multiupload.com/SGCU73AT5W
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to xator91 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
3rd February 2011, 11:53 AM   |  #2  
Senior Member
Flag caserta
Thanks Meter: 81
 
324 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2009
Donate to Me
More
... this version use in the win 7 ... because win 7 not visible screen with MTL 5.64 ... by psycoy ...
3rd February 2011, 11:57 AM   |  #3  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
18 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
this program says: ----Interface was improved by Xenon----
its just a modification of MultiLoader 5.64 or its an official version?... or just the changelog its the GUI modification?
anyway... it looks so good!
Last edited by dari-woka; 3rd February 2011 at 12:10 PM.
3rd February 2011, 02:01 PM   |  #4  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
2 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
xator91

ThankISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS _2_ You For This Useful Post
3rd February 2011, 02:38 PM   |  #5  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 3,176
 
4,651 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2008
Attention.

Original.
5.62 and 5.64 are over 100 KB... also my 5.65.

Original 5.65 attached here.


@ xator91

Please tell us differences, what is improved?
Filesize?


Btw.:
I not use 5.65 at all.
As my 5.64 runs very stable at Win XP SP3 to flash S8500.

Best Regards
Attached Files
File Type: rar MultiLoader V5.65.rar - [Click for QR Code] (47.3 KB, 28033 views)
3rd February 2011, 03:52 PM   |  #6  
xator91's Avatar
OP Recognized Themer
Flag Palermo
Thanks Meter: 597
 
692 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2011
Donate to Me
More
Adfree Hello, I also use version 5.64, this version 5.65 posted by
me, have only new GUI.

psycoy, is absolutely not true that 5.65 solves the problems with Windows 7, because I
I use the Windows 7 and 5.64.

Best Regards.
3rd February 2011, 05:07 PM   |  #7  
Senior Member
Flag caserta
Thanks Meter: 81
 
324 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2009
Donate to Me
More
... for the reason of my answer I invite you to read here ... http://www.badanation.de/topic.php?t=2963&page=1 ...
8th March 2011, 02:55 AM   |  #8  
Member
Thanks Meter: 6
 
42 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2011
Angry
Quote:
Originally Posted by adfree

Attention.

Original.
5.62 and 5.64 are over 100 KB... also my 5.65.

Original 5.65 attached here.

There's a big difference indeed:
V5.65 ~50KB: Virustotal.com online check reports some malware
V5.65 you posted (>100KB): no malware reported by Virustotal.com

Some doubts it's been filled with malware and compressed...
9th March 2011, 02:45 AM   |  #9  
Member
Thanks Meter: 16
 
89 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
adfree can you post your version of 5.64 here? Thanks mate.

This modified version of 5.65 is nice. Looks like "Xenon" cleaned up the interface and the layout is nicer. For those interested, you can do this using Resource Hacker. As for containing viruses, modding a program doesn't inject anything. Often it's simply a packed .EXE file that the virus scanners detect as a virus. But in reality often it's a false positive and lazy scanning, as they detect it's been packed, and then just assume it's a virus/trojan.

As for this particular modded 5.65, as to whether it contains a virus, it came up clean when I scanned it at my end.
9th March 2011, 03:00 AM   |  #10  
Member
Thanks Meter: 6
 
42 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrazyKong

As for containing viruses, modding a program doesn't inject anything. Often it's simply a packed .EXE file that the virus scanners detect as a virus. But in reality often it's a false positive and lazy scanning, as they detect it's been packed, and then just assume it's a virus/trojan.

Modern AVs can scan and even unpack compressed exe files without troubles, belive me. Since the other versions than that provided by adfree (clean) have been reported as suspicious by 6 AV engines (not just 1, though false positives are always possible) my advice is to not risk just for a nice looking GUI.
You can test the files by yourself with virus online check services like Jotti.org or Virustotal...
Last edited by hexaae; 9th March 2011 at 03:04 AM.

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes