Post Reply

Nand or SD/MAGLAR

10th February 2011, 10:47 PM   |  #1  
OP Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
44 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2007
i have a little question for all cookers, i have tried about 30/40 NAND roms, and for me is the best alternative solution for hd2 at wm 6.5, i have tested this roms with quadrant and the max result that i had about 2200, yesterday i have tried 2 SD/MAGLAR roms http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=947572 and after quadrant benckmark i had this results 1680 and 2100.
Now, my question is , why that is possible? if the nand are more fast than sd card?
thank you.

my config

MAGLDR113
sd 2 gb classe 2
Last edited by giacomone; 10th February 2011 at 10:52 PM.
10th February 2011, 11:01 PM   |  #2  
casemandan's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag L.I. NY
Thanks Meter: 441
 
651 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by giacomone

i have a little question for all cookers, i have tried about 30/40 NAND roms, and for me is the best alternative solution for hd2 at wm 6.5, i have tested this roms with quadrant and the max result that i had about 2200, yesterday i have tried 2 SD/MAGLAR roms http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=947572 and after quadrant benckmark i had this results 1680 and 2100.
Now, my question is , why that is possible? if the nand are more fast than sd card?
thank you.

my config

MAGLDR113
sd 2 gb classe 2

just shows you how meaningless quadrant score is
nand build suffers in the I/O department of the quadrant test but like i said it doesnt mean much it's still as fast as sd builds
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes