FORUMS
Remove All Ads from XDA

 View Poll Results: What is your S8 variant and what flash chip do you get?

I have an Exynos S8 and I get UFS 2.0
 
6 Vote(s)
1.75%
I have an Exynos S8 and I get UFS 2.1
 
205 Vote(s)
59.94%
I have an Snapdragon S8 and I get UFS 2.0
 
61 Vote(s)
17.84%
I have an Snapdragon S8 and I get UFS 2.1
 
70 Vote(s)
20.47%

UFS 2.0 or 2.1? Identify the flash chip in your S8

425 posts
Thanks Meter: 308
 
By lch920619x, Senior Member on 5th May 2017, 03:28 AM
Post Reply Email Thread
EDIT1:
Before we make any conclusion of Samsung putting inferior components in some S8 units, please read the following, I think Aamir Siddiqui has written it well enough:

Quote:

Theoretically speaking, the difference between UFS 2.0 and UFS 2.1 objectively exists and is large enough for phone OEMs to tout the superiority of one over the other.
Practically speaking, most average users and even smartphone enthusiasts will not be able to distinguish between the performance of UFS 2.0 versus UFS 2.1, unless they compare both side-by-side. In real life and daily usage, UFS 2.0 will unlikely be the bottleneck in your flagship experience. Had Samsung gone for eMMC 5.1, the memory specification would have had a much more profound and noticeable impact on your experience. Thus as a silver lining, Samsung is only juggling between UFS 2.0 and UFS 2.1 for now.


Edit2:
For the information we have gathered so far, we have come to the following conclusion, if anyone has any finding that differs from this please let us know and show us the screenshot:

Quote:

Samsung UFS 2.1:
All Exynos Models -> S8 / S8+
Toshiba UFS 2.1:
Snapdragon Model -> S8+ ONLY.
Toshiba UFS 2.0:
Snapdragon Model -> S8 ONLY.


Original Post:
Interesting fact: on their website, Samsung used to list S8/S8+ with UFS 2.1 flash storage, however now they have changed the specs and listing only UFS without specifying whether its 2.0 or 2.1.
See below screenshots of Samsung official website, I took the first screenshot 1 week ago and the 2nd today. Samsung has silently removed the UFS 2.1 line.
Click image for larger version

Name:	42c49c12c8fcc3ce6e1d16159845d688d53f200f.jpg
Views:	11984
Size:	224.6 KB
ID:	4138721

Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20170505-102145.png
Views:	11584
Size:	179.9 KB
ID:	4138722


Now we know that some S8s are using ufs 2.1 chips while others using ufs 2.0 only.
Luckily there's a way to exactly identify your flash chip.
Download any terminal emulator from play store.
for example this one will work
Material Terminal
then type in this in the terminal window:
Code:
cat /proc/scsi/scsi
and you should get the exact model no. of your flash chip, taking my SM-G950FD as an example, i get this:
Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot_20170430-160130.jpg
Views:	17090
Size:	243.7 KB
ID:	4138717

what I circled in red is the ufs model number:

In this case get:
Code:
KLUCG4J1ED - B0C1
a quick google search reveals that this is a UFS 2.1 chip made by Samsung, using MLC flash.

Click image for larger version

Name:	v2-c4588db13175545020afd5dca22a7a00_r.jpg
Views:	15140
Size:	133.2 KB
ID:	4138718

Now what I heard is that all exynos variants of S8 and S8+ uses UFS 2.1, all Snapdragon S8+ also uses UFS 2.1, and only some Snapdragon S8 uses UFS 2.0.

You may also get something like:
Code:
THGAF4G9N4LBAIRA
THGAF4G9N4LBAIRB
or
Code:
THGBF7G9L4LBATRA
THGBF7G9L4LBATRC
These two are made by Toshiba, the one ends with IR something is UFS 2.1 while the one ends with TR is UFS 2.0. There might be slight variations in the model no. , anyway it's the letter I and T that matters.

Click image for larger version

Name:	QQ截图20170505103747.png
Views:	24168
Size:	58.2 KB
ID:	4138729
Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot-toshiba.semicon-storage.com-2017-05-05-10-36-31.png
Views:	8214
Size:	8.8 KB
ID:	4138730


Alternatively you can use Androbench to test the speed of your flash chip. For the sequential read speed, I believe that S8 with UFS 2.0 usually fall in 500MB/s range, while those with UFS 2.1 can get close to 800MB/s. However keep in mind that this is not the accurate way to go, if you really want the truth, pls use terminal and the code.
For example results from my UFS 2.1 S8:
Click image for larger version

Name:	mmexport1492853705972.jpg
Views:	8848
Size:	69.2 KB
ID:	4138723

Please test your own S8 and let us know what you get.
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to lch920619x For This Useful Post: [ View ] Gift lch920619x Ad-Free
 
 
5th May 2017, 04:05 AM |#2  
altimax98's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Mulberry, Florida
Thanks Meter: 594
 
More
I've got IRA and it is 2.1
5th May 2017, 04:13 AM |#3  
Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
More
I have the TRC. Disappointing, though not totally sure I'd never notice the difference in practice. Verizon S8.
5th May 2017, 05:46 AM |#4  
Member
Thanks Meter: 7
 
More
What's the difference though
The Following User Says Thank You to soggly For This Useful Post: [ View ] Gift soggly Ad-Free
5th May 2017, 05:49 AM |#5  
OP Senior Member
Flag Singapore
Thanks Meter: 308
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by soggly

What's the difference though

Storage speed will be different. However I don't think there'll be any perceptible difference during everyday usage
5th May 2017, 08:23 AM |#6  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 31
 
More
TRA here on the Verizon s8 Didn't Huawei or someone just get slammed for doing this exact same thing?
5th May 2017, 11:47 AM |#7  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 317
 
More
UFS 2.1 Exynos
5th May 2017, 11:53 AM |#8  
MistaJae's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 59
 
More
Just checked my S8 Exynos (UK). I have UFS 2.1
5th May 2017, 01:33 PM |#9  
Junior Member
Flag Dallas
Thanks Meter: 2
 
More
Verizon S8+ here on IRA 2.1
Thanks for the info
5th May 2017, 01:37 PM |#10  
Senior Member
Flag San Rafael, CA
Thanks Meter: 97
 
More
Verizon S8, TR chip, rev 0600. 547/135 read/write. looks like ufs 2.0 and if what Sammy marketed was 2.1, that's an easy cause for a return.

That said, I absolutely love the device despite being the first non-rooted Android I've ever owned. I'm happy enough to keep it until the pixel 2 shows itself.
5th May 2017, 01:55 PM |#11  
mobilehavoc's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 356
 
More
I have TRA ending on mine so assume that's UFS 2.0

I have a Verizon S8. While obviously faster is always better - how much difference does it make in real world? I don't spend time running benchmarks all day so curious if anybody has both devices accessible and do some real world tests like launching apps, multitasking, etc.

---------- Post added at 08:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:53 AM ----------

I wouldn't be surprised if Samsung used UFS 2.1 for their own Exynos devices and possibly for Qualcomm S8+s since more expensive. Anybody here have an S8 qualcomm version with UFS 2.1? My guess is most S8 Qualcomm (regular) are using UFS 2.1 storage and S8+ Qualcomm are using UFS2.1
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Guest Quick Reply (no urls or BBcode)
Message:
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes