Recent content by pennzoilgtr

this is sick man. :good:

you really make full use of the f/1.7 aperture especially on the cat. and nice shot for the scrambler launched in the air, what shutter speed did you use to freeze the subject?

for this hdr setup, i consider it as between newbie to advance. so long you know the basic principal of how manual exposure works and some editing skills in photoshop. then you good to go. basically i took 7 images gradually from lowest to highest exposures called "Manual HDR Bracketing", then...

The wife is very natural :)

i didn't use or try those classic manual lense that much anyway ... as modem lense this days don't really have with issues with flares.... Low-dispersion.. UD element...Subwavelength Structure Coating.. whatever they call that to combat flaring... i haven't experience any of those purple...

nice explanation bro.

nice depth of field, hopefully future mobile phone will probably be f/1.0 and it will be bokehlicious !

Same here for my Asian G935FD. I've already update it to the latest European software and lost my VoLTE. But the phone feels great now.

that shape correction thing actually does works, not best though. :cyclops: at least the centre isn't "squeezed" any more but for the barrel distortion, it remains. left: without correction right: with correction as you can tell, the lines are at least straighten in the center of the frame...

your lens is fine :) it happens when you place camera too near to the subject for a wide angle lens. you can use "shape correction" in the camera setting to correct that. cheers. :)

chill dude. spend more time with it, everything has a learning curve to start with. :) i was a noob back then with simple a point and shoot camera, now i can handle ranges of dslrs and currently doing freelance photography as side line business.

didn't read the previous post, my bad. i'll remove it immediately. cheers. :good:

bro & sis who use manual mode to shoot in raw, here are something interesting to learn about between jpeg & raw. shots are taken at iso-100, both images are 100% crop in for pixel peeping. for this, I'm comparing night shot. facts: jpg = 3.5mb / raw = 23mb jpg = compressed / raw = image taken...