Search results

Tomsgt123 and my knowledge.

I have info otherwise from other sources

If they were included in the update they would be loaded each boot, throwing your phone into the emergency fastboot mode every time power is sent to the phone. I have been told by people that the sbl files are leaked from qcom and tbh it makes sense. Sbl1 and 2 are loaded early in the boot...

Why would motorola include insecure "secure bootloaders" that brick the phone, in the update ?

... I want to specifically know if the leaked files will work with the 8610 chipset. I know it is the wrong form but its not like others have not done it.

Has anyone attempted this on a Moto E or G first gen ?

so I have actually been on their a**es for the past few days about that. They have dropped support for the device and Trac/Straight will not even recognize what a bootloader unlock is. So I brought it up with moto and they opened up a report about having the device supported under the unlock...

the Surnia moto e is the 2015 moto e. Large difference

if its the xt830c variant, no. I would doubt it would for the other variant either as tracphone does not plan to update their moto e to lollipop and has signature checking enabled

If I remember correctly, it is known that data is broken on kitkat for everything but evervolv, another reason why I took down the downloads (I think I took down the downloads)

They are releasing an LTE version on sprint

Don't do cwm backup, you will be sharing your data

Its probably in /cache as update.zip just adb pull it

Grab the ota zip, then flash it in twrp, it should be in /cache

its because of system write protection, we need something that wont bother that

yea that wont work

someone needs to show me where the root method is at =P lol

I will try it, I dont mind messing with my device, I can probably look at the apk as well and find the exploit to see what it is.

Anyone think XT830c will get the update now as well ?

Please close, downloads are currently dead and I do not have last working copy anywhere

Upload ur device tree and Hals to Git and if I get a chance I will look at it, but I can't flash because I have a locked device (freaking tracphone ?)

I just realized that, that flag won't do jack squat unless you add the display hal patch it relies on. Really, don't worry about sepolicies until everything works, permissive ~= disabled, the only difference is that it will log security errors on permissive

Unless there is an 8210 on code aurora you will be better of fixing 8974 or 8960 for 8210 boards. The devices not using sepolicies are most likely either using the same chip set as the nexus 5 or 6, or are set to permissive Edit- also, if it is not flashing to the device because of the by block...

They are not good enough to do a full device, when we did d2 we still had to override a lot of them and write out own, just put androidboot.selinux=permissive and you bypass selinux for now until you can create policies, which BTW not everything shows in audit.log , you will have to grep kmsg...

Set permissive via cmd line in boardconfig

Just a tip: when doing a bring up SRT to permissive and work on sepolicies once everything works Edit - s/SRT/set

No just ota, it has to do with signature checking in the boot loader that is enabled via qfuse

I have a feeling kexec won't work, based on cm using the iommu heap for display and camera where and verizon uses v4l2 as the heap for everything which is a very different heap which means the display driver is different

You know the cm manifest dropped right, you are going to have to hack pure aosp to h*ll to get it booting and working. I work with the d2 maintainers on bring ups and even on cm there is hacking to be done. If you can't write C and CPP and or solve build errors you will not be able to do such a...

your problems are that d2 uses -caf hardware repos and you are trying to compile with the stock aosp qcom hardware repos. You will need to wait for the -caf repos to build. You removed the liblights from msm8960-common right ? yea you dont want to do that, the samsung msm8960 devices use a...

I kid you not. There are many back doors though. Linus torvalds had to agree to allow backdoors. I don't know if you know about the back door that happened in 2003. Selinux does provide security but I'm sure it's a backdoor, but there are more in the kernel so... Sent from my SCH-I535 using...

What makes me really laugh is if you make menu config you find that selinux is made by the NSA, it is essentially one big backdoor disguised as a security platform Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Oh yes, lots more power. I think it probably more power than in the Linux kernel itself (pc wise) Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

They were talking about it on g+ and it leaked. But if you go check out their git they have been uploading repos, like system/core has a cm12 branch and every repo has staging branches already. Also since Kitkat we have been using enforcing. I work with the S3 maintainer Invisiblek so I...

You run custom ROMs, there will be built in work around in external/selinux for that. If you really want to set permissive go ahead but I know for a fact that the cyanogen mod team isn't and almost every custom rom bases off of them. Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

1)cant use xposed with art because it specifically used a vulnerability as a hook to initialize 2) actually the way chain fire is doing it is just as effective because if you read up, he is getting the su binary root privileges before selinux is being enabled for the os. Setting permissive is...

Unpack the boot.img, find init.rc, locate install-recovery's section in init.rc, remove the seclabel from install-recovery... If you guys were setting the device to permissive you were doing it wrong. The way I just listed is how chain fire is doing it per his Google plus Sent from my...

There is no way to remove that verification. It is part of the Omni /build. If you want to remove the sig checks, remove them yourself via Unpack the zip and modifying the updater script Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

yes, I made those.. they were not made for people to use but to work with someone to figure out how to get 5.0 gapps together.. the app structure in Lollipop is different therefore you can not deodex the apps in the same was as before (and the stock apps coming from dumps are odexed, but when...

google play services crashes from there

which ones did you use and how did you install them ?

That is not true.. if you look into the app files like I did they have them.. I may show you here .. This is from the last nexus 5 preview

I had a set as well, and I looked at the logcat and it was that it was looking for the odex files but because the system is compiled to be deodexed it cant find it. I have had a build on my grouper since 4:30 est.. I was lucky and stalked the aosp so I was able to start syncing the 5.0.0_r2 tag...

they dont work because they are odex'd.. they need to be deodexed before they can be used, which I assume is why we dont have a gapps package yet

One I got the other day had a few sensors errors Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Can you get a last_kmsg? Ive had someone on official tell me the same thing for maps nav for quite some time now. Maybe if I yell at Nard long enough in irc he will look at it lol Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

It's the YouTube app, I've actually been having problems on my GS3 running cm11 lately. It's only after updating the YouTube app to the latest few versions Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk ---------- Post added at 04:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:05 AM ---------- Don't...

Boot menu works, but needs to be enabled. If you want icon badges get nova launcher because stock launchers don't do that here Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

It's vol down and power =) vol up and power is screen cast if you have it installed from the play store (you need to have the beta from the cm betas page) Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Swiftkey is free now Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk