Realme ui / cos does not support aux lenses. It's not a gcam issue, it's realme OS. We must ask realme for this feature
If you install custom rom such as LOS the aux lenses work
Latest and best #gcam for our X2 Pro.
- Thread starter Xebeck
- Start date
If you install custom rom such as LOS the aux lenses work
If aux camera need special permission from rui/cos
Is any gcam to support 16mp output for selfie cam ? I use unrooted os and @Arnova8G2 and @Urnyx05 only give 4mp output for selfie cam
Thanks
Is any gcam to support 16mp output for selfie cam ? I use unrooted os and @Arnova8G2 and @Urnyx05 only give 4mp output for selfie cam
Thanks
Can you take raw photos on all cameras? and the main camera takes you 12 megapixel or 64 megapixel raw photos? in reality, all the photographic applications that take raw photos only let you take 12 megapixel photos
Seems like Realme failed on this one then. I just don't understand why or how they messed that up.
Yes, I also don't get it. Good thing the developers are trying to workaround this issue. Thumbs up to them!
What are you talking about? He didn't ask for an opinion about the phone, but the GCam app.
Also, on the contrary, this is probably one of the best cheap flagships you could buy.
I don't think so its good to buy in this price list its worst phone ever, and gcam even its not supported face retouching
And i thinks its a great values.
No face retouching yet? So what, might come in a update later on.
If you dont like the phone, sell it.
Its not harder than that.
No face retouching yet? So what, might come in a update later on.
If you dont like the phone, sell it.
Its not harder than that.
Dude what?? So no face retouching makes the phone useless? Most people (myself included) just get rid of that s*it on any phone in any camera app immediately.
Seems like there's no support for aux cams on stock rom yet (besides the stock camera). That's the only negative currently.
Similar threads
Top Liked Posts
-
There are no posts matching your filters.
-
7Arnova (the gcam developer) has recently joined the x2 pro telegram channel and will be developing gcam for our mobile. He asked for our help to provide logs5Good evening.
I've just recently bought the Realme X2 Pro 128GB, and tried several GCams.
I've found a very stable one that has some flaws, but is the best so far for me.
Some limitations:
- doesn't shoot in 4K
- doesn't shoot in 60 fps, only 30
- doesn't do slow motion
Upsides:
- very stable and snappy, everything else seems to work just fine.
- allows saving portraits directly to "DCIM/Camera" instead of creating one subfolder per portrait.
GCam: PMGC_7.0.009_HDR_Version_V13.apk.
They do provide a config file for our phone: realme-x2-pro.xml.
I've tweaked it to my liking, here: leo-realme-x2-pro.xml.
NOTE: This one has a particularity: you have to save the config to "/GoogleCamera/ConfigsCamera".
Sharing this to contribute to this forum, that already helped my a lot
Enjoy!4
Dude what?? So no face retouching makes the phone useless? Most people (myself included) just get rid of that s*it on any phone in any camera app immediately.4PLEASE READ EVERYTHING.
Arcide-PZD8.2-v8-Google.xml
This second config is more interesting and is what I'm using primarily. I recommend this one.
Place the XML here: /Internal storage/ConfigsSettings8.2/
You load the config by double-tapping the black bar around the shutter button in the camera viewfinder.
- Google lib, better dynamic range
- Reworked a lot of settings
- used small sharpness levels section in the lib patcher, preferring smaller radius of sharpening in good lighting for clearer and crisper natural photos.
- optimized noise reduction settings
- lowered saturation of reds
- enabled Sabre merging (Sabre 4)
- portrait mode works fine with Google lib
Use the Zeta2ex1 xml ONLY with the APK with Zeta2ex1 lib, and Google xml ONLY with the APK with Google lib. They have different package names so you can install them both and compare them directly.
Sabre pros:
- Removes the grid texture in all photos
- removes artifacts from bright lights in dynamic lighting
- removes artifacts from motion in moving objects (cars, people walking)
- preserves small details (like small text in the distance) better
- less noise overall, in my experience
Sabre cons:
- it may have some random blur on textures
- worse details in very dark conditions (also a result from that blur)
If you wish you can disable Sabre, but I've concluded it improves photos in almost all situations.
I've uploaded photo comparisons between the BSG private version (the config for it can be found a few posts above), PZD with the zeta2ex1 lib (attached in the post above), PZD with the Google lib (attached in this post), and the stock cam. Also uploaded comparison of the differences between Sabre ON and OFF.
