That doesn't appear to show HDR, the picture appears to be too pale. On the G6 those balls are a lot deeper. See the red shades in my 1st picture.
That doesn't appear to show HDR, the picture appears to be too pale. On the G6 those balls are a lot deeper. See the red shades in my 1st picture.
that's bizarre, those pics look radically different (and better than your pics). it is HDR.
I've tested different 4K HDR captures (videos) from my Xbox One X and MX Player Pro is definitely not playing them with HDR where as stock Samsung's stock player is. It's definitely washed out colours and the darker areas appear pale instead of how HDR should be. I've compared on my 4K HDR TV and Samsung stock player with MX player. My TV has a pop up to say HDR and a banner on the S8 stock player. I believe Samsung S8/S8+ use Samsung's own HDR so that is also why Netflix doesn't support the device, where as the note 8 is supported.
I have been trying many 4K HDR files on my Xperia XZ Premium, with all of them, regardless of codec, performing perfectly fine in MX player. However, there is one file I have come across that gives me performance issues, an HDR sample video from Digital Foundry (https://www.digitalfoundry.net/2017-10-17-free-download-gran-turismo-sport-hdr-sampler). Despite other 4K HEVC HDR 60FPS files (such as Sony's higher bitrate Swordsmith demo http://4kmedia.org/sony-swordsmith-hdr-uhd-4k-demo/) playing back perfectly fine, this one plays back choppily in HW+, and barely plays back at all in HW (SW plays back in untonemapped HDR with heavy slowdown, but that is the case for all HDR files I have tried.) The HW+ performance is the best out of the video players I have tried, with the stock sony video app playing back about the same as HW, and VLC performing worse than that in all modes.
Did a comparison side by side on Note 8: "Samsung Video Player" & "MX Player"
File: "Atmic Blonde (2017) 2160p 10Bit HDR"
Result: MX Player plays the file without any hiccup, so does the Samsung Video Player
But there is clearly visible difference between the contrast of both of them.
Samsung's Stock Video Player's looks fantastic, whereas MX's is somewhat dull as compared to the former.
In a nutshell, MX does'nt show an HDR as "HDR" .
Hi
I just got a 4K UHD TV which claims to have HDR and HLG support. I am trying to test out. I came across these files in this chat. It seemed the URL doesn't exist anymore. Any possibility of reloading the files again?
Thanks.
But stock player doesnt support some audio codecs on my Note 8 give error to me how to sort that out any clue?
Did a comparison side by side on Note 8: "Samsung Video Player" & "MX Player"
File: "Atmic Blonde (2017) 2160p 10Bit HDR"
Result: MX Player plays the file without any hiccup, so does the Samsung Video Player
But there is clearly visible difference between the contrast of both of them.
Samsung's Stock Video Player's looks fantastic, whereas MX's is somewhat dull as compared to the former.
In a nutshell, MX does'nt show an HDR as "HDR" .
Not as of now but You will get the full HDR pleasure in default Samsung Video Player. Go for it.I’m considering to get a galaxy tab s5e, may i ask if the mx player pro is supporting hdr better in 2019?
Thanks!
Nothing wrong with MX Player in my S10+. It plays 10-bit HDR10 4K HEVC just fine (HW+ enabled). Video output look the same in the stock player and MX Player.
Yea. Properly encoded HDR files play as expected. Like tigole prints, Atomos etc... psarips doesn't work because they add hdr metadata after the conversion. So yea, 4K x265 HDR works in MX and Stock Player.
Hi.
Also tested European version of Galaxy S8 with Exynos 8895 and it's able to read excatly the same video files as Tab S3 with absolutly no jitter.
Both Tab S3 and Galaxy S8 claim to work HDR file formats and it's true.
Yea. Properly encoded HDR files play as expected. Like tigole prints, Atomos etc... psarips doesn't work because they add hdr metadata after the conversion. So yea, 4K x265 HDR works in MX and Stock Player.