Originally Posted by ticklemepinks
thats fine, but u seem to point out no positives and it seems like by downing htc that samsung and apple are better, samsung build quality isn't up to par to htc i feel. software wise, i really won't speak on cuz I know i'm def more partial to sense, but i think all companies have the quirks
I actually think the last few Samsung phones had better hardware specs than the HTC phones. (Epic better specs than Evo 4G, Galaxy S 2 better specs than Evo 3D)
I'm not trying to just blindly bash HTC, just calling it like it is.
HTC build quality had light leakage issues on both the Evo 4G and Evo 3D, USB port failures on the Evo 4G, screen cracking on the Evo 4G, screen separation on the Evo 4G and Evo 3D, and digitizer issues on the Evo 3D. I don't know anything about Samsung's build quality because I've never owned one of their phones. But I do know from experience that HTC build quality hasn't historically been all that stellar.
I still bought the Evo 3D even though the Galaxy S 2 was better though because it had 3D and HTC promised to unlock it. And if the Evo LTE had 3D and HTC promised to fully unlock it (s-off) then I'd probably buy it too. But as it stands right now, I know Samsung is fine with their devices being fully unlocked so I'm leaning that way for my next device.
I'm not a blind HTC hater. On the contrary, I'm a long time HTC customer who is planning on making his voice heard with his wallet. And when someone posts a thread in the Evo 3D forum, I should be just as entitled as anyone else to post my thoughts on the subject. Especially when people quote my posts and call me out.