HTC ONE X LTE vs HTC ONE X International

Search This thread
Can happen with ANY phone ...

HTC better pray that the screen flicker issue is not prevalent in the Snapdragon edition. If by some chance it is, the North American tech sites will explode with criticism. (And rightfully so.)

If I get the One X and experience anything of the sort, even for a brief moment (like described in the Twitter example in this thread), then I will return my phone and go back to the iPhone. That is inexcusable.

Inexcusable, yes; however, anything can happen with ANY phone, including the iPhone.

Peter
 

mrpopgun

Member
Oct 14, 2011
24
2
Pretty sure I've seen this question posted, but I can't seem to find it. Can the HOX mount a USB stick? It can be mounted as USB storage by a PC , but wondering if it can mount USB storage? If so, long flights become much easier - micro USB to female USB cable and movies on a thumb drive.

Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA
 

equlizer

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2007
1,562
270
you need the cable made just for that. It cant be used for anything else except memory sticks. Ebay has them for $3. USB OTG
 

BarryH_GEG

Senior Member
Jan 16, 2009
10,197
5,142
Spokane, Washington
Pretty sure I've seen this question posted, but I can't seem to find it. Can the HOX mount a USB stick? It can be mounted as USB storage by a PC , but wondering if it can mount USB storage? If so, long flights become much easier - micro USB to female USB cable and movies on a thumb drive.

Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA

The international version can't. Partly because of an Nvidia issue. Beyond that, what HTC's intentions are aren't clear. The S4 version could be different.

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24299455&postcount=16
 

americasteam

Senior Member
Jan 31, 2011
1,288
370
Bowling Green, KY
There isn't a great deal of light in my office, which could explain the noise and grain; however, I would agree that, in this VERY simple test, the Rogers unit takes better pictures.

I have to emphasize, though, that this is an overly simplified test. Bottom line, if I were to take similar pictures in a variety of lighting and contrast situations, there may be no difference at all. I don't know.

Although photography is one of my hobbies, I really would never think of using a mobile phone camera to take "GOOD" pictures ... and that applies to ALL mobile phones. However, given what's inside any modern smartphone, the camera in the ONE X, both versions, is incredible. The single thing about the ONE X camera that amazes me is the burst mode. It's truly astounding how many pictures this phone can take in such a short period of time.

Regarding video, I'll try to do a comparison another day. Unfortunately, I simply don't have time today, or in the next few days.

Peter

Photography is one of my old hobbies as well. It's just one sample, but I would rather see them both in low light than perfect lighting conditions. In perfect conditions, they should both take great pics. I also agree that I wouldn't use a mobile phone to take "GOOD" pictures, but I don't have my DSLR with me at all times. It's nice to have a capable shooter on your phone for taking everyday pics you would miss otherwise. We all thank you for you time posting all this info!
 

BarryH_GEG

Senior Member
Jan 16, 2009
10,197
5,142
Spokane, Washington
Has anyone found the colour temperature of the xl to be a bit warm (~5500k)?

Both the X and XL use displays from two different vendors. The Sensation did too. One display's cool, the other warm. There's been variations with cool being "blue" and warm being "yellow." You can try an exchange if your display's out of spec or if you purchased it from a flexible reseller. But technically, neither is right or wrong; just different.
 

Jookie01

Member
Apr 26, 2009
8
1
Both the X and XL use displays from two different vendors. The Sensation did too. One display's cool, the other warm. There's been variations with cool being "blue" and warm being "yellow." You can try an exchange if your display's out of spec or if you purchased it from a flexible reseller. But technically, neither is right or wrong; just different.

I haven't noticed it but I only use my screen at 10% brightness to save on battery life.
 

JSLEnterprises

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2011
1,349
1,360
Buenos Aires
Both the X and XL use displays from two different vendors. The Sensation did too. One display's cool, the other warm. There's been variations with cool being "blue" and warm being "yellow." You can try an exchange if your display's out of spec or if you purchased it from a flexible reseller. But technically, neither is right or wrong; just different.

... same with the old DHD variants... but even with the 3 different vendors for them, the color temp was pretty much the same.

One would expect it to easily be fixed in an update I wouldn't doubt.

---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 AM ----------

I haven't noticed it but I only use my screen at 10% brightness to save on battery life.

I notice it excessively when leaving the brightness to auto. (I have mine set to about 40%)
 
Last edited:
5500 is not warm ...

Has anyone found the colour temperature of the xl to be a bit warm (~5500k)?

No offense, but 5500K is not warm. I know this area very well because my business is LED lighting, and colour temperatures are an integral part of our customers' specifications.

5000K = Neutral
Greater than 5000K = Cold
Less than 5000K = Warm

Peter

P.S. To answer your question, I can't say either way if they are a bit warm or a bit cold. I'd have to do some specific testing. If anything, my initial impression is that they are reasonably neutral.

Addendum: I didn't realize until after I sent my last reply, above, that you were referring to the unit's display, and not the images from the camera. I've read numerous entries here on xda about displays being either warm (yellow), or cold (blue). Although I've seen pretty good evidence of the yellow screens, both my units, the Rogers and the International ONE X, appear to have very neutral and extremely accurate colour rendering.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JustAnotherCider

nativestranger

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2010
356
28
There isn't a great deal of light in my office, which could explain the noise and grain; however, I would agree that, in this VERY simple test, the Rogers unit takes better pictures.

I have to emphasize, though, that this is an overly simplified test. Bottom line, if I were to take similar pictures in a variety of lighting and contrast situations, there may be no difference at all. I don't know.

Although photography is one of my hobbies, I really would never think of using a mobile phone camera to take "GOOD" pictures ... and that applies to ALL mobile phones. However, given what's inside any modern smartphone, the camera in the ONE X, both versions, is incredible. The single thing about the ONE X camera that amazes me is the burst mode. It's truly astounding how many pictures this phone can take in such a short period of time.

Regarding video, I'll try to do a comparison another day. Unfortunately, I simply don't have time today, or in the next few days.

Peter

Looks much better on the dual core version. Less noise and sharpening artifact. But its hard to be sure when the focus point is much further back on the tegra version. Can you repeat the test with both focused at the same point?
 
More Image Comparisons ...

Looks much better on the dual core version. Less noise and sharpening artifact. But its hard to be sure when the focus point is much further back on the tegra version. Can you repeat the test with both focused at the same point?

I did the test again, but this time I focused on the exact same point (marked by RED circle), and I tried my very best to position both phones in exactly the same spot.

Here are smaller images, side-by-side. The Rogers unit is on the left.

ROG_OneX_Small.jpg
INT_OneX_Small.jpg


Here is the original Rogers image, no processing, all camera settings identical:

ROG_OneX.jpg


Here is the original International image, no processing, all camera settings identical:

INT_OneX.jpg


Again, I'd have to say that the Rogers unit provides a truer image with slightly less noise, although, the differences this time are very small. In fact, they are almost unnoticeable.

Peter

Addendum: Here are two 100% cropped images for further comparison:

Rogers on Top

ROG_OneX_Crop.jpg


INT_OneX_Crop.jpg
 
Last edited:

Maedhros

Senior Member
Sep 24, 2008
996
128
Toronto
... same with the old DHD variants... but even with the 3 different vendors for them, the color temp was pretty much the same.

One would expect it to easily be fixed in an update I wouldn't doubt.

---------- Post added at 02:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:19 AM ----------



I notice it excessively when leaving the brightness to auto. (I have mine set to about 40%)

Yes, mine was the same as yours. It looks "ok". But compared to the White display... your missing out. I suggest exchanging it.
 

nativestranger

Senior Member
Aug 18, 2010
356
28
I did the test again, but this time I focused on the exact same point (marked by RED circle), and I tried my very best to position both phones in exactly the same spot.

Here are smaller images, side-by-side. The Rogers unit is on the left.



Here is the original International image, no processing, all camera settings identical:


Again, I'd have to say that the Rogers unit provides a truer image with slightly less noise, although, the differences this time are very small. In fact, they are almost unnoticeable.

Peter

Addendum: Here are two 100% cropped images for further comparison:

Rogers on Top

Thanks for the images. Which phone provides the better user experience so far?
 

mesasone

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2010
374
29
Eastern Iowa
Weird, looking at the EXIF data from the International and NA One X's, there are a lot of fields that aren't populated on the North American version but are on the International version. Perhaps they aren't running the same version of the camera software. Could be that different versions of the camera software are processing the image data differently.
 

JSLEnterprises

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2011
1,349
1,360
Buenos Aires
Pete, if you have your One X (Teg 3 model) rooted, go into system/etc/ and edit mediaprofiles.xml and scroll down to the image encoding lines (should be after the initial video encoding lines).

change the values to 100, and increase the memcap then save (if you used es file explorer's text editor it'll automatically made a backup - .bak, so you'll be able to revert the changes afterwards)

reboot (turn off fastboot in the power settings first)
and then retake a picture... see if there's any improvement. (quite possibly the teg3 model is compressing the images more than the xl model)
 
Last edited:
You are correct re EXIF data ...

Weird, looking at the EXIF data from the International and NA One X's, there are a lot of fields that aren't populated on the North American version but are on the International version. Perhaps they aren't running the same version of the camera software. Could be that different versions of the camera software are processing the image data differently.

You're right. I mentioned this unusual difference in my first post with the image comparisons. The International unit has much more EXIF information than the Rogers unit. Why? Not sure.

Peter
 
I'm biased, but ...

Thanks for the images. Which phone provides the better user experience so far?

I have to admit some bias here because I'm a big fan of LTE, which I take advantage of regularly, although, perhaps not often.

For this reason alone I prefer the Rogers unit; however, all things considered, both are incredibly good phones.

Peter
 
I'll check and test again tomorrow morning ...

Pete, if you have your One X (Teg 3 model) rooted, go into system/etc/ and edit mediaprofiles.xml and scroll down to the image encoding lines (should be after the initial video encoding lines).

change the values to 100, and increase the memcap then save (if you used es file explorer's text editor it'll automatically made a backup - .bak, so you'll be able to revert the changes afterwards)

reboot (turn off fastboot in the power settings first)
and then retake a picture... see if there's any improvement. (quite possibly the teg3 model is compressing the images more than the xl model)

I'll check and test the Tegra3 version tomorrow morning.

Peter

P.S. I noticed something quite amazing. You've had 957 total posts, and 955 "Thanks." Quite astounding, if I may say so.
 
Last edited:

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 19
    As many of you already know, I now have both versions of the HTC ONE X, the international version (released out of Singapore), and the Rogers unit with LTE.

    Although it may still take a day or so, but I plan to use this post to offer my opinion on both devices, and to compare the differences in terms of data speed, wifi performance, battery consumption, and whatever else someone needs to know. If I have time, I will try my best to answer your question.

    Please remember that my company consumes upwards of 70 hours a week of my time, plus the fact that I have an amazing 2-1/2-year-old daughter, who consumes even more of my time … and she can be quite demanding. :) Fortunately, though, I have an incredible wife who puts up with my phone addiction.

    I’ll try and report back on preliminary data this evening.

    Peter

    ===============================================================================================
    ===============================================================================================

    SUMMARY OF ALL MY POSTS UP TO THE MORNING OF APRIL 22

    ===============================================================================================
    ===============================================================================================

    Rogers is supplying ONLY the white version at this point. There is no indication at this time if they will also carry the grey version.

    ORIGINAL SOFTWARE (ROM)
    ROM (Software Number): 1.73.631.1
    Android Version: 4.0.3
    HTC Sense: 4.0
    HTC SDK API Level: 4.11
    HTC Extension Version: HTCExtension_403_1_GA_4
    Baseband Version: 0.16a.32.09.06_10.81.32.14L
    RIL: Unknown
    Kernel Version: 3.0.8-01111-g188cf26
    Build Number: 1.73.631.1 CL54373 release-keys
    Browser Version: WebKit/534.30

    There are only four system languages: English-Canada, Spanish, French, and Chinese. There is no option for English-US or English-UK.

    Initial impression: Fantastic (much like the international version)

    Response: Also fantastic on both units.

    Security-Unknown Sources default is to allow installation of non-Market apps (surprising).

    Total available internal space: 2.15GB
    Total available storage space: 9.93GB (In case you ask, yes, 9.93 is correct)

    Boot screen is typical Rogers: Red letters with white background on boot, and white letters with red background on power down. The boot process is about 90% HTC ONE X, with only a brief appearance by the Rogers red/white logo; however, the entire power down screen is Rogers.

    Rogers LTE APN:

    Name: Rogers LTE
    APN: ltemobile.apn
    Proxy: Not set
    Port: Not set
    Username: Not set
    Password: Not set
    Server: Not set
    MMSC: http://mms.gprs.rogers.com
    MMS Proxy: 10.128.1.69
    MMS Port: 80
    MMS Protocol: WAP 2.0
    MCC: 302
    MNC: 720
    Authentication Type: None
    APN Type: *
    APN enable/disable: APN enabled (default)
    Bearer: Unspecified

    Here are the network selection options in the Mobile Network Settings:

    HSPA only
    GSM only
    GSM / HSPA auto
    GSM / HSPA / LTE auto

    Yes, you can shut off LTE if that's what you want, and it works. I selected GSM/HSPA auto to see if it would NOT try to access LTE, and it didn’t. It stayed on GSM/HSPA, even during my speed tests.

    There's very little bloatware. Here's what's installed, other than standard HTC apps:

    Rogers 1 Contact
    Rogers 1 Number
    Rogers Games
    Rogers My Account
    Polaris Office
    Rogers Ringtones
    Rogers Live
    Rogers Shop
    SoundHound
    TuneIn Radio
    Rogers urMusic
    Twitter
    YouTube

    Here are some initial benchmark comparisons. Keep in mind that my Rogers unit is not rooted, so I could not optimize certain things, including SDCard read/write tweaks.

    The international ONE X figures below are the average for 3-4 test runs.

    AnTuTu:
    Rogers = 7002 / International = 10576
    Clearly the Tegra3 outperforms the SnapDragon

    Quadrant:
    Rogers = 4851 / International = 4670
    Surprising!

    Vellamo:
    Rogers = 2184 / International = 1608
    Wow, even I'm shocked!

    CF:
    Rogers = 12725 / International = 24451 (Yes, THAT high)
    This is what you'd expect, so not surprising.

    After a second round of testing, here are Test 1/Test 2 comparisons. They are virtually identical (with the exception of Vellamo, where there was a significant improvement). Numbers in brackets () are the average scores for the international unit.

    AnTuTu: 7002 / 7001 (10576)
    Quadrant: 4851 / 4833 (4670)
    Vellamo: 2184 / 2360 (1608)
    CF: 12725 / 12750 (24451)

    There’s a significant physical difference between the two designs. The glass cover over the camera on the international unit is absolutely flush with the camera frame (the part that sticks out and has been the topic of much negative discussion). This is not the case on the Rogers unit. The glass cover is about 1/2mm below the frame. It's not much, but certainly a lot when you consider putting your phone down on a surface that's somewhat rough. At least there's a bit of space now. Here’s a link to some images of both camera covers:

    http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25138374&postcount=78

    Here are average data results for the Rogers unit after three tests in each category:

    LTE Download: 29.77 to 39.63 Mbps
    LTE Upload: 26.28 to 26.83 Mbps

    HSPA Download: 5.55 to 6.91 Mbps
    HSPA Upload: 1.09 to 2.71 Mbps

    The LTE is amazing, not to mention that I was getting only 1-3 bars with LTE, yet I was still able to get fantastic speeds. I was getting 5 bars for the HSPA tests.

    The Rogers unit does NOT come with headphones. Here’s what’s in the box:

    The phone
    USB cable
    Charger
    Special device to open the SIM slot (although a paperclip works equally well)
    Documentation

    A question was asked by Flyarnk in another forum about an alleged problem with call NAME display. I can confirm that call NAME display works; however, the call does not show up in the call record.

    Both Wifi hotspot and USB tethering work flawlessly, and they are very easy to set up.

    I've been using the phone for about 20 hours, and my current impression is fantastic. I haven't yet found a single glitch. So far everything is working flawlessly. The Rogers unit is butter smooth and effortless. I did not get the same impression with the international unit. As I mentioned before, there were numerous glitches and unusual behaviour with many apps when I started using the international unit. It wasn't until I installed the LeeDrOiD ROM when almost every problem was solved.

    Both units have the typical HTC FM radio; however, the Rogers unit also has TuneIn Radio, and it includes both FM and AM. Yes, they work great.

    Both units support NFC.

    DropBox works flawlessly.

    The overall finish on both units is exceptional. I can't tell if there's any difference between the two. There are no chips or anything like what’s being noted about the HTC ONE S.

    In my opinion, I cannot see any reason why cases would not fit both phones. Yes, there is the very minor physical difference in camera covers, but I can’t see that interfering with the fit of a case.

    As you may recall, I mentioned in an earlier post that I have a profile that sets automatically at 11pm each evening to what is effectively airplane mode. This then automatically changes to my morning profile at 7am each morning.

    On my previous phones, mostly HTC, but a few by Samsung (see signature), the battery would drop to anywhere from 95% to 92% during this "airplane mode" period.

    With the international ONE X, however, it was still at 100% at 7am each morning. This is probably due to the use of the 5th core, where the phone goes into very deep sleep. However, I can now report that the Rogers unit is equally frugal.

    Last night I charged my phone to 100%. I unplugged the phone at exactly 10:59pm, and then allowed it to automatically go into airplane mode at 11pm. I did not touch the phone until 5am this morning. Okay, it's not 7am, but 5am isn't much different when I tell you the results. Now you may be asking why I touched it at 5am. Well, I couldn't sleep, so I got up at 4am and went to work. Then, at exactly 5am, I woke up the phone, and the battery still indicated 100%. I can only assume that it would probably still be 100% at 7am, or maybe 99% at worst.

    Regardless, it seems that in sleep mode, both phones use almost zero power.

    It's not a technical test by any means, but it's a simple comparison. I will do more battery testing tomorrow when I have much more time to leave both phones with their displays on, and both in virtually the same "situation."

    MORE TO COME ...
    8
    Physical Camera Differences ...

    Below are images of the camera cover and overall protrusion.

    The diameter of the entire camera frame/trim is as follows:

    Rogers: 24mm
    International: 22mm

    ONE_X_Recessed_Cover.jpg


    ONE_X_Camera_Differences.jpg


    As you can see, there are other minor differences, and I tried my best to get images of the recessed glass cover over the Rogers unit, and the flush cover on the international unit.

    Peter

    Addendum: I forgot to say that the overall thickness of the phone measured exactly at the centre of the camera is 11.5mm for the Rogers unit and 11mm for the international unit. Therefore, my earlier guess that the glass cover is about 1/2mm below the outer frame is, in fact, accurate. It seems that HTC supplied not only a casing that's larger in diameter, but also 1/2mm thicker, to recess the glass a bit.
    4
    More Image Comparisons ...

    Looks much better on the dual core version. Less noise and sharpening artifact. But its hard to be sure when the focus point is much further back on the tegra version. Can you repeat the test with both focused at the same point?

    I did the test again, but this time I focused on the exact same point (marked by RED circle), and I tried my very best to position both phones in exactly the same spot.

    Here are smaller images, side-by-side. The Rogers unit is on the left.

    ROG_OneX_Small.jpg
    INT_OneX_Small.jpg


    Here is the original Rogers image, no processing, all camera settings identical:

    ROG_OneX.jpg


    Here is the original International image, no processing, all camera settings identical:

    INT_OneX.jpg


    Again, I'd have to say that the Rogers unit provides a truer image with slightly less noise, although, the differences this time are very small. In fact, they are almost unnoticeable.

    Peter

    Addendum: Here are two 100% cropped images for further comparison:

    Rogers on Top

    ROG_OneX_Crop.jpg


    INT_OneX_Crop.jpg
    3
    There's a summary of all my comments in post 1 ...

    Hopefully this will make it a bit easier for some people.

    I've summarized all my comments on the original post. This is up to and including this morning (my time) of April 22, 2012.

    Peter
    3
    Darn... got my 1X and settings menu looks yellow...

    Don't have any other unit to compare to. Will post pics a little later.

    Pete... could you kindly take some pics of both your screens using a LCD testing app like display tester?

    Thanks

    Yellow...

    p4180360.jpg


    http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25017508&postcount=1


    Not yellow (mine)...

    6945454322_846f14549b.jpg


    http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=25024269&postcount=9