Sorry mate didn't notice it in hurry.
Yeah, just test with 2/3 cables, and you'll find it. Do post here what you've found, price, and the ratings too.
Best of luck.
'Swyped' from my GT-N7100
What physics is behind this huge difference in cables' performance? Is it size/internal resistance or are there other factors?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
★★★This topic is for them who are having problems with stock charger and cable. If you don't have any problems, ignore this ★★★
Well, since I purchased my Note 2, I kept facing this slow charging problem. Now what is slow charging some of you will ask? Well, it's simple. The device is taking more than normal time for charging. Now how do you know the default/should be rate for charging? Simple again. The AC adapter clearly says output rate as 2000 mA or 2.0 A. So with that calculation Note 2's monstrous 3100 mAh should be fully charged with 2 hours. But as we've seen steady 2.0A is not the output case in some/many scenario, so add another 30 mins to it. So whatever it is, from 0-100%, the device shouldn't take more than 2 hours 30 minutes.
And for me, it was taking around 5 hours! Sometimes 4 hours 30 minutes, and if it's very fast then 4 hours. Well I was never gonna wait 4 damn hours before going to my office and irritate myself, and I don't have the habit of charging overnight, unless I absolutely need it.
So I kept calling my retailer, asked for replacement, and they did, well, you won't believe, they replaced three times actually, so I had three different Note 2, with three different charger. Well, each of them acted absolutely fine at first 3-4 charge, then the problem was back again and again. I in fact turned off the device and put it into trash once.
Then I thought let's try some different USB cables, I tried my friend's Galaxy Ace cable. Charging current kept fluctuating between 1000-1200 mA. Which was better than those faulty stock cables, which provided steady 900 mA. Sometimes it even was detecting the AC current as USB, which would provide a mere 460 mA and would take God knows how long! Then I found my piece. I went to my retailer, frustrated and angry, asked them to give me the thickest and shortest possible cable, and they provide me one from a Samsung phone's box, but I can't recall which device was that! And then I sat there for half an hour, kept plugging and unplugging, and the current rate was rock steady at 1800 mA. I took it, paid just 10$ and came back.
Since then I have charged my phone almost 10 times and the current rate never went below 1800 mA / 1.8 A.
This is the cable I am using, do notice that it has 5 pin set up against stock cable's 4 pi, if that matters in any way, and it's about 10% thicker than the stock cable and also about 9" shorter.
And how will you monitor the charging current, three ways are there,
1- Battery Monitor (yet I don't know how to exactly use it)
2- If you are rooted (which is a must anyway), then just go to, /sys/class/power_supply/battery/current_avg
3- Use the attached app. It basically reads the current value just exactly as above but it saves the time to go into that file every time. A big thanks to Deadvirus.
Thanks to this post and it's poster for informing us about the current output reading path,
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33585646&postcount=31
The Maxim 77693 charger chip is capable of detecting voltage differentials in the charger lines; if it decides that this differential is too great, then it reports a sort of "unstable power" to the kernel, which in turn reduces the input current in 100mA steps until the chip stops reporting problems. That's what's happening.What physics is behind this huge difference in cables' performance? Is it size/internal resistance or are there other factors?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Stock seems to be giving me 1.8A consistently, I did try with an extension cord though (just for testings sake), which made it go down to 300mA instead.
What cable? Price?Finally.
Sent from my GT-N7100.
Those who help noobs go to heaven. True story.
You gotta picture with stock showing 1.8A consistently?
The current fluctuates on these chargers. You won't always get 1.8A.
Congrats. Rs.250 is almost half as mineA very generic Nokia cable I got from my phone dealer. Aparently he is an electrical engineer, and knew exactly what I was looking for. Should have gone to him first
Cost me just Rs.250. That is around $5 for you guys. Shows a constant 1800mA. Charged from 73% to 100% in 20 mins or something. Will try a full charge and time it once my battery gets depleted. Thing is, the new Indian MA6 stock is giving a GREAT battery life, so will havta wait.
Sent from my GT-N7100.
Those who help noobs go to heaven. True story.
A very generic Nokia cable I got from my phone dealer. Aparently he is an electrical engineer, and knew exactly what I was looking for. Should have gone to him first
Cost me just Rs.250. That is around $5 for you guys. Shows a constant 1800mA. Charged from 73% to 100% in 20 mins or something.
Congrats. Rs.250 is almost half as mine
Btw- MA6 giving you great backup? Good. For me it's same like last one, LL7 that was I guess, if not worse!
'Swyped' from my GT-N7100
That looks great ! Lol, i think i have two such old nokia usb cables somewhere, will try charging with these . Although sometimes the stock charger with cable charges really fast (5% - 95 % in ~2hrs), but there are times when charging is very slow for me (as already mentioned by many here).
I had serious issues on LL7, reduced my battery time by half if not less. I actually had to factory wipe device data and clean cache partition 2 or 3 times for it to give a decent backup.
And this 'decent' backup too wasn't anywhere near what I had from my original stock ROM.
MA6 is working great for me. I don't know if this seems because I have just come up from the damned LL7, but it feels almost better than my original ROM.
Have you used the app mentioned by the OP on your device? If yes, then how much does it show for you?
I just charged my device from 3% to 100% in about 130-140 mins with the new cable. Wifi/ sync were on, and I did have a Titanium backup+Sms/call log backup scheduled which ran in the background. I think I might be able to charge my device within 2 hours if I just shut it down while charging.
Sent from my GT-N7100.
Those who help noobs go to heaven. True story.
A very generic Nokia cable I got from my phone dealer. Aparently he is an electrical engineer, and knew exactly what I was looking for. Should have gone to him first
Cost me just Rs.250. That is around $5 for you guys. Shows a constant 1800mA. Charged from 73% to 100% in 20 mins or something. Will try a full charge and time it once my battery gets depleted. Thing is, the new Indian MA6 stock is giving a GREAT battery life, so will havta wait.
Sent from my GT-N7100.
Those who help noobs go to heaven. True story.
The Maxim 77693 charger chip is capable of detecting voltage differentials in the charger lines; if it decides that this differential is too great, then it reports a sort of "unstable power" to the kernel, which in turn reduces the input current in 100mA steps until the chip stops reporting problems. That's what's happening.What physics is behind this huge difference in cables' performance? Is it size/internal resistance or are there other factors?
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Probably nothing much, especially considering resistive cable losses.First thing, I would be carefull with that charger as it supplies 5.3V and not the default 5V. I do not know what will be the effect on your phone/battery if you continue using that.
Although I'd play it safe with my motherboard (I have a 4 year old machine - I suppose newer machines have higher output USB ports), as for the charger I've been using these values or slight variants thereof ever since I loaded this kernel several months ago and made some experimentation with it. In the course of this experimentation my chargers did not suffer, I've been able to steady my charging rate and, probably most importantly for those who do not care for the electrical concepts, the battery never overheated.But to your question - I do not know if those values indicate "input current" or "battery charging current" so I would strongly recommend using STweaks or TricksterMod as they have clearly labelled settings.
To values then:
DCP and AC Charger Input Current - set 2000
DCP and AC Charger Charge Current - set 1400
CDP and SDP Input current - set 1000
CDP and SDP Charging current - set 1000
Those are safe values, unless you have some very bad charger withous overheat protections or really, really bad USB port in your PC you will be safe with those values.
The INPUT CURRENT is the total current going into the phone from the charger. It defines the maximum current to ask from the charger. Going above what the charger can actually produce (let's say, asking 2.1A from a 2.0A charger) could lead to charger overheating, which may cause temporary thermal shutdown or could even burn the chip itself and by that I don't mean the chip will catch on fire, you probably won't see nor smell anything funny except that suddenly there is no output anymore no matter how long you wait.Oh ok I think I get what he was saying now. The input current is in regards to what's provided while using the phone, and the battery charge current is in regards to charging the battery only. I don't have those options with my kernel so I had no clue what he was talking about, but now it makes sense.
It's unlikely you will, especially considering losses from the cable, you probably get less then 5V at the device. Good rule of thumb: check to see if it gets hot at the microUSB port (not merely warm).As far as the 5.3V charger goes I've actually been using it for about 6 months with this phone and I haven't had any issues whatsoever
Don't worry about the charger, if it's UL tested, it won't burn the place down. They really, I mean, really torture these things to make sure it won't cause serious damage even under the most extreme conditions. The only thing that is remotely dangerous on a cell phone is the battery, and it has a chip that will blow a fuse before it goes into meltdown. If you use an OEM battery there should be no problem.
I doubt the OEM battery will let you charge it any faster (remember the battery chip is the ultimate boss here), so I don't see the point, unless that current is meant to apply for the total of Charging and Input.Anyway as far as the AC Charger Current goes with my kernel if it helps the default untouched setting is at 1700mA, and I have been using this charger with that setting and I haven't had any problems so far. So I was just wondering if I could turn it up a little to possibly decrease the amount of time it takes to fully charge the phone, but now I'm under the impression that it doesn't work like that? If that AC Charger Current that I can adjust with my kernel does control only the battery charge current and set to 1700mA by default, what would the advantages of increasing that be if it's not possible to increase the rate of charge?
The current is controlled this way: Charger Output -> Kernel Power Management -> Battery Charge ControllerI guess that's where I'm confused because if you increase the amount of charge coming from the charger (and as long as the charger is capable and can handle it), wouldn't that technically make the battery charge faster? I'm definitely not disagreeing with what anyone has said whatsoever just to clarify, I'm just asking because I think I'm missing something.
Do yourself a favour and use Battery Monitor Widget instead, and check current over time, at least 20 minutes. GCC is pretty useless.Ok thank you for responding and now that I understand that there's difference between input and battery charge current, I'm not anywhere near as confused as I was before lol. I understand what you're saying about the battery having a max charge restriction, so I'm assuming that the GCC app is only showing the input and not what's going to the battery (battery charge current) correct? The reason I'm saying that us because whenever I change the value of the AC Charger Current, it reflects the same in the GCC app so for example if I set it to 1900mA, it shows all 3 max current and average at 1900mA. So if the battery has a limit of max charge current, GCC would only show up to that limit if it were displaying the battery charge current correct? Anyway I appreciate you pointing out that it's a 5.3V charger because it never even crossed my mind to be honest, and I definitely understand that just because it's working fine now doesn't mean that something couldn't happen eventually. I'll start looking for another charger to use just to be on the safe side because I can see it toasting my phone out of nowhere with my luck! Lol Thanks again!
Sent from the bag phone in my Pontiac Fierro
So...
When the phone is used, and it is consuming ~600mA... Say it has 2000mA current input and 1400mA current charge... It will charge battery by 1400mA BUT the phone will USE 600mA provided from the charger (to not use the battery)? Like a laptop when it is plugged in to the charger but with the battery not inserted?[/quite]
Right. However should the power consumption rise, it will get the power where it comes from and the battery WILL CHARGE SLOWER, or even discharge.
Right.Using a higher voltage charger could alleviate amy potential loss through the cable. Right?
Congratulations, you just graduated from Electricity 001 and probably now understood why we need high voltage to carry electricity over long distances~0.2V is anyway gonna be wasted... And the phone's got an internal regulator which only takes in 4.35V (so the rest translates to a bit higher current, right?), so I'd say you're safe...
Sent from hyperspace
---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:31 PM ----------
Although some of it is indeed lost as heat, the device only uses what it needs. That's the basic idea behind modern switching power supplies.That's awesome I was just going to mention that the internal regulator limits the voltage to 4.35v (just like you said), so I wouldn't think it would matter anyway.
Imagine you have more power than you need. Instead of putting a resistor in between and losing the excess as heat, you simply take the full amount, but only for a certain amount of time, let's say, 80% of it, to get an effective 4V from 5V, so the power is effectively SWICHED on and off, usually several thousand times a second, this averages out to what you need..But I was also going to say that I have no idea what happens to the rest of the voltage though, so I appreciate you clearing that up!
---------- Post added at 07:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 PM ----------
Two thumbs up, Man!As far as I know, when you lower the voltage, the current goes up. As far as I know = I could be entirely wrong.
The voltage regulator does transform the input voltage (5V, 5.3V...) to a steady 4.35V, but I don't know how much voltage it can take until it breaks... I'd say 5.3V is not enough to cause any damage, and it can be handled by the internal regulator easily.
I mean... what the f***, this phone has a chip to detect unstable current & broken cables and it doesn't have a powerful enough voltage regulator to work with +/-0.5V?
-----
As far as the other thing goes... input/charge current (1A goes in the battery, 0.5A goes in the phone, laptop style)... I really don't know and am waiting for others to answer on the issue.