Remove All Ads from XDA

SAR levels

27 posts
Thanks Meter: 14
By NeoCreator, Junior Member on 28th April 2014, 11:10 AM
Post Reply Email Thread
A few words about SAR. Phone has body 0.62W/kg and head 0.75W/kg SAR levels.

Info from Carl (admin OPO forum)
28th April 2014, 04:16 PM |#2  
FuMMoD's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Flag South Florida
Thanks Meter: 3,085
Donate to Me
I had no idea what this was so I googled it.



SAR (specific absorption rate) is an indication of the amount of radiation that is absorbed into a head whilst using a cellular phone, the higher the SAR rating the more radiation that is absorbed into the head.


A SAR value is a measure of the maximum energy absorbed by a unit of mass of exposed tissue of a person using a mobile phone, over a given time or more simply the power absorbed per unit mass. SAR values are usually expressed in units of watts per kilogram (W/kg) in either 1g or 10g of tissue.


In Europe, the European Council Recommendation 519/1999/EC for exposure guidelines has adopted the recommendations made by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP Guidelines 1998). In the US, the FCC, Federal Communications Commission, sets the radio frequency safety guidelines that all phones must meet before being sold in the US. Current reference standards and limits (status January 2001).

30th April 2014, 04:52 PM |#3  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
I have no idea if this is good or bad? how is it compared to other phones?
30th April 2014, 11:41 PM |#4  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 455
I think it's good.
1st May 2014, 02:11 AM |#5  
Wisiwyg's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Denver
Thanks Meter: 193
As reference, I looked up the SAR of several phones... Samsung Galaxy SIII i535 (CDMA. VZW) had an overall rating of 1.29 US / 0.88 EU. Note the US and EU measure them differently. The US legal limit is 2.0. The source did not differentiate 'head' or 'body". source:
They're selling a radiation shield to help prevent exposure and it benefits them to provide lots of information - so take this with a grain of salt. It is very difficult to find comprehensive lists because the manufacturers would rather not have to publish this information. Lots of issues related to radiation exposure potentially causing brain cancer. Kind of like the cigarette manufacturers - smoking didn't cause cancer, no need to worry, nothing to see here, move along.

You make your own choices...
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Guest Quick Reply (no urls or BBcode)
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes