Thanks karandpr, running terminal emulator it gives the following info:
nodev sockfs
nodev pipefs
nodev anon_inodefs
nodev configfs
nodev devpts
ext3
ext2
cramfs
nodev ramfs
vfat
msdos
nodev jffs2
yaffs
yaffs2
nodev mtd_inodefs
I apologize, I'm so new to Android I don't know what some of those terms mean?
Just guessing what's not shown It doesn't have and suspect nodev preceding something means it doesn't have that either.
So I suspect it does have ext2 and ext3 and should use one of those?
Is one preferable over the other?
Again, sorry for being such a n00b..
Thanks and Best Wishes,
b7
---------- Post added at 05:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:04 PM ----------
Some googling and think I've answered my own question.
ext4 with journaling turned off would be best as journaling entails extra writes to the sd card shortening its potential life and also takes a performance hit.
But since my gingerbread phone only has ext2 and 3 then 2 would be preffered as 2 has no journaling and journaling cannot be turned off in ext3.
Im new but will learn fast and probably screw some stuff up along the way.
Any comments good or bad or advice is much appreciated.
Thanks Guys!
b7
Nodev represents filesystems which can't be used by block devices(hard disks and memory cards...)
Mostly I wouldn't care if it ext2 or ext3 or ext4...end user performance is about same ...
If you plan on Filesystem tinkering then I would suggest keep the tune2fs and fsck binaries handy ...
Usually I use ext2 on my mini pro and it works without any problems since a year ...
On my old phone when I used ext2 ,I had massive app crashes on reboot ...so I tweaked the script for mandatory fs checking on boot(fsck the second sd card partition) ..
Mostly it's trial and error ...
I wouldn't give a damn about "articles" claiming "potential wear" with journalling..
SD Cards are cheap and expendable ...Practically it's impossible to predict it's life so all that "research is faulty"