Testing installation methods
First off thanks for such a great rom!
I've been testing various installation methods the leyman/common consumer would use.
For example this:
MagDLR > 4EXTRecovery SD (Archived zip) > RMNET > DirectSD > 2 of Suitably Sized EXT4 Partitions 1024GB Page swap (Class 10 SanDisk 32GB SD card)
...produces the most stable results.
I've had issues trying TWRP/4EXT/CWM etc When using their nand versions...
No bad blocks as of yet on my HD2 (checked with MTTY) or on my SD card.
Nand/DataOnEXT installations of this rom, frequently have error messages like : "Unfortunately <this app> has stopped"
Any idea as to why that is?
My theory is the difference in read/write speed.
My second question regards NativeSD and DirectSD Installations:
After flashing these roms using either nand/sd recovery.. it doesn't allow me to flash zips over the rom. While the process seems successful. Nothing is written to the contents of either EXT partitions, Perhaps it cannot recognise them?
Thirdly does this rom include init.d support on Native/DirectSD installed roms?
After using 00tests for init.d no log files have been produced... suggesting no.
Yet there are clearly other scripts in there... like 99swap.
... and the swap partition is being used.
I'm sorry if these questions seem nooby, I have used the search function and found nothing helpful.