(OC)Official GingerBread Kernel/**Multitouch fix added Aug 08**/Ring no Fade updated

********* OFFICIAL FOR USE ONLY ON GINGERBREAD ***************
Special thanks to PaoloM70.

Personal Thanks to Andy, Mik_os, Franciscofranco, Ciaox, Noejn and all other devs.
AmonRA to flash it with the need to disable the verification of signatures.
Overclocking
Smartass
Smoothass
Cifs
Supports EXT4
+upstream to 2.6.35.13
+oc, interactive, smartass, smoothass, cifs, ext4
+governor added SavagedZen
+autogroup scheduler (the patch of 200 lines)
+ smoothass smartass with a capped rate (standby) to set minimum
V3 Kernel -Old kernel:
ADB Bugfix for device
Reconfigured various kernel parameters (For better power management, CPU profiles)
-Added for the inversion axes Sippola in the new touch screen driver.
-Simple-inserted I / O scheduler (sio)
-Included various other patches 5-6
-Removed references-debug (smaller kernels)
-Small fix to reduce the impact on the CPU more pressure on the display (you can check with Neocore first ... the difference came in 8-well 9fps now settles down to 2-3fps)

******Updated 25 July*********

Magazine-routine to increase the stability and overclocking performance, cameraflick is absent up to 729mhz
Touch-fix which decreases the occupation of the CPU when you press your finger on the display (should no longer have the lag that had the first version of V4 (I hope))
Magazines-and reinsert all the previous patches (66 patches in total)
Inserted by the kernel-2.6.36 backport of block, and mtd workque
Backport-inserted by the kernel 3.0rc6 and cpufreq of cpuidle

http://www.mediafire.com/?g8r37pzsr3ig21j

+same kernel but without the fix for employment cpu (maybe better in the scroll lag if you have one) **No touch fix kernel***

http://www.mediafire.com/?bed0ht9kcz0071c

******Updated 08 Aug*********
Touch V6 2.6.35.14

V5-like, but updated to version 2.6.35.14
-Added 2.6.36 kernel backported from the i2c
-Support Module tun.ko
-Vsync enabled

http://www.mediafire.com/?otpne0w1v8bhnp8

If you want to try the version NoTouch kernel

http://www.mediafire.com/?4wuiscjcu5xal58

After flashing, wipe cache and davlik.

If you have a2sd then run the following in terminal:
su
a2sd cachesd

The phone will reboot automatically.

Download Ringing with No fade :Now supports Gingerbread 2.3.3 :

http://www.mediafire.com/?1xqcc0jppl2w9ic

Flash and enjoy

To know more the original idea, please visit the thread here :

Special Thanks to Januka for the idea.

For devs :

I/Paolo doesn't have a repository, So its uploaded here :

Kernel Ginger Source
http://d-h.st/jvn

u only need to change one line in Makefile

at line 193 change from

to

Roqu3 said:

Theres always room for improvement, if you can do it then it will be great

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

This is a great kernel and I thank you Paulo for your hard work, but I'm more interested in taking the good things from it and informing franco and fserve so they can improve their kernels.

Here's how I see it, this kernel has the CPU Touch fix which helps with battery life and gaming performance. It also supports WiFi tethering on Official LG. IMO francos kernel is equal to or better than it in all other facets. If these 2 fixes are added to francos kernel this one would be obsolete. Again, this is my opinion.

Although I'm capable of tweaking a few things and updating governors I don't think it's worth the effort. I'd just end up copying the good things from francos kernel to this one, see what I mean, there's no point.

terratrix said:

Hmm, isn't v5 better? I heard that v6 is buggy...

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

I never found v6 to have more bugs than v5. Vsync is disabled in v5 so benchmarks are better but at the expense of overall quality. Also, v5 isn't patched to .14.

Vonpire:
Exactly what bugs exist in v6 that don't exist in v5? Would you please be more precise than "Yup V5 is much better"?

I've found plenty of posts where people say "it's better" but with no decent explanation as to why. Is it just the better benchmarks? If so, then v5 is better if you prefer vsync off and v6 is better if you prefer vsync on. That's the only conclusion I can draw.

neko95 said:

> Anyone still have v6 touch kernel and willing to revive a link?

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

I think this is it, but I haven't tested it myself. Flash at your own risk. No touch version also included.

kernel_2.6.35.14_v6-touch3.zip
kernel_2.6.35.14_v6-notouch3.zip

Roqu3 said:

As far as i remember his kernel came first, and since the beginning the camera flicker and wifi tethering were fixed, so its kinda hard to believe that he was copying you, but thats just my opinion.

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

I didn't say he copied me, and I'm not adding you more fuel. Good day sir.