FORUMS
Remove All Ads from XDA

[Info] Exynos Octa and why you need to stop the drama about the 8 cores [Upd 25/05]

3,209 posts
Thanks Meter: 14,750
 
By AndreiLux, Senior Member on 15th March 2013, 04:42 PM
Post Reply Email Thread
8th April 2013, 12:52 AM |#161  
Turbotab's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 837
 
More


Note that the current frequency is listed as 1300 MHz, which means that the Benchmark is running on the A15 cluster, if the max clock of 1.2 GHz for the A7 is correct. I would have thought that the A7 would have been enough for such a GPU focused benchmark.

A lingering question is how the 5410 responds to touch inputs, as Jelly Bean uses a CPU boost, whenever a touch event is triggered to increase smoothness, but does it trigger the A15s???
8th April 2013, 01:40 AM |#162  
AndreiLux's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 14,750
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbotab



Note that the current frequency is listed as 1300 MHz, which means that the Benchmark is running on the A15 cluster, if the max clock of 1.2 GHz for the A7 is correct. I would have thought that the A7 would have been enough for such a GPU focused benchmark.

A lingering question is how the 5410 responds to touch inputs, as Jelly Bean uses a CPU boost, whenever a touch event is triggered to increase smoothness, but does it trigger the A15s???

It doesn't mean anything at all. That current frequency is the CPU frequency at the time you open up the information page of any application, it's relatively useless.

Also the IKS doesn't map things directly. At frequencies like 1000MHz you won't know which core is online simply through frequency. The frequencies reported are virtual ones, and hopefully normalized to the A15 performances. ARM did it the other way round on their test chips and reported frequencies normalized on the A7 cores which is stupid as things went up to 2.4GHz reported even though max was 1.2GHz on the A15.

It's senseless to discuss it until we actually will see the source code, you will not be able to come to conclusions from any application not designed with the new frequency planes in mind.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AndreiLux For This Useful Post: [ View ] Gift AndreiLux Ad-Free
8th April 2013, 03:59 AM |#163  
STAticKY's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Christchurch
Thanks Meter: 395
 
More
Very informative you write ups are AndreiLux. Thanks so much for your huge input and involvement in the community
8th April 2013, 02:00 PM |#164  
Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
More
Will there be a noticeably difference between the Snapdragon and the Exynos for a normal User except battery? Cause Im not shure to wait for the Exynos or "just" get the Snapdragon.
8th April 2013, 04:27 PM |#165  
yahyoh's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Amman
Thanks Meter: 1,943
 
More
i think that why Samsung didn't used Powervr series 6 cuz it will not be available till Q3

8th April 2013, 06:26 PM |#166  
Turbotab's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 837
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by yahyoh

i think that why Samsung didn't used Powervr series 6 cuz it will not be available till Q3

haha,it won't be long before the Galaxy S5 rumours start flying.....
8th April 2013, 06:28 PM |#167  
PLUG313's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Estremoz, Évora
Thanks Meter: 155
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by lyeileen

4 cores just ok, as far as you know, note II with 4 cores and iPhone 5 with 2 cores. There is no need to pay more for a 8 cores operation.

the thing is, you won't be paying more
you'll pay the same you would pay for any flagship

and it's been said a million times, but I guess you didn't understand that 4 of the cores are used ONLY to save battery, that's why they're necessary, not for the power
10th April 2013, 02:54 PM |#168  
Senior Member
Flag Kuala Lumpur
Thanks Meter: 249
 
More
http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/10/...snapdragon-600
seem like this is the final firmware for s4...antutu showing 250 to 1600mhz
28k score awesome...if overclock to 1.9 like the s600 at least scoring 30k ady....
10th April 2013, 02:59 PM |#169  
yahyoh's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Amman
Thanks Meter: 1,943
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by jianlinooi

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/10/...snapdragon-600
seem like this is the final firmware for s4...antutu showing 250 to 1600mhz
28k score awesome...if overclock to 1.9 like the s600 at least scoring 30k ady....

yep they seems removed the 1.8 from frequency table

10th April 2013, 11:05 PM |#170  
AndreiLux's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 14,750
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by jianlinooi

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/04/10/...snapdragon-600
seem like this is the final firmware for s4...antutu showing 250 to 1600mhz
28k score awesome...if overclock to 1.9 like the s600 at least scoring 30k ady....

Quote:

In previous test firmwares Samsung had clocked the Exynos 5 Octa CPU to 1.8GHz but in the most recent test firmware it has been decreased to 1.6GHz, as Samsung officially announced.

Haha, amateurs. The phone was running at 1.6 since forever. Just to give you perspective on how credible these bullshít websites are.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AndreiLux For This Useful Post: [ View ] Gift AndreiLux Ad-Free
10th April 2013, 11:20 PM |#171  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 61
 
More
We always believed in you And I am glad that you were right . Now Qualcomm fanboys can ****

Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Guest Quick Reply (no urls or BBcode)
Message:
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes