[KERNEL CM11/Carbon4.4.2/AOKP4.4.2/CM10.2] Chaco kernel 20140116

caspboy · Mar 5, 2014

Is this kernel working with lastest cm11 build? Any bugs it bring?

spanish33 · Mar 5, 2014

Originally Posted by albertusac 
What is the max freq? 
 
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

 
 
 
1228Mhz!, 1267Mhz is VERY unstable !

Thanks replacing boot.img and flashing rom did the trick to get wireless working for me. Will test it for a couple days to see how overclocking is on battery life.

How do I verify that it is really overclocked and not just higher frequencies being displayed in cpu app?

By the way if you are going to continue development of this kernel you should create your own thread.

Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

honeyx · Mar 5, 2014

spanish33 said:
How do I verify that it is really overclocked and not just higher frequencies being displayed in cpu app?

Run some benchmarks like Antutu and make some screenshoots of the results at stock clock and when overclocked.

ertank07 · Mar 5, 2014

What is the ideal cpu setting?

FedeeManchiini · Mar 5, 2014

spanish33 said:
Thanks replacing boot.img and flashing rom did the trick to get wireless working for me. Will test it for a couple days to see how overclocking is on battery life.

How do I verify that it is really overclocked and not just higher frequencies being displayed in cpu app?

By the way if you are going to continue development of this kernel you should create your own thread.

Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app

Yes, really overclocked, I still have not gained much performance, in set cpu bench, gained only 300ms

I create my own thread these days, maybe receive a little help

ertank07 said:
What is the ideal cpu setting?

200-1228Mhz, I haven't increased much voltage, why I think it's not stable in 1267Mhz.

Sorry for my bad english!

PTGamer · Mar 5, 2014

FedeeManchiini said:
Yes, really overclocked, I still have not gained much performance, in set cpu bench, gained only 300ms

I create my own thread these days, maybe receive a little help

200-1228Mhz, I haven't increased much voltage, why I think it's not stable in 1267Mhz.

Sorry for my bad english!

no performance improvements with maclaws cm11 02-03-2014 only for the worse...
antutu score: 9850 @1000Mhz governor: on demand IO:noop
antutu score: 9748 @1200MHz governor: on demand. IO:noop

last test
antutu score: 8775 @1228MHz governor: performance IO:noop
CPU integer 769 cpu float 580

i think the cpu isnt scaling correctly. anyway open a thread

spanish33 · Mar 5, 2014

honeyx said:
Run some benchmarks like Antutu and make some screenshoots of the results at stock clock and when overclocked.

Yea I didn't notice much of a change in benchmark scores. You ever thought about doing a kernel yourself for s3mini?

PTGamer · Mar 5, 2014

spanish33 said:
Yea I didn't notice much of a change in benchmark scores. You ever thought about doing a kernel yourself for s3mini?

i think the OC is a placebo-effect.... my score is lower than the maclaws stock kernel

testing only the cpu with antutu shows no gain on performance..
stock settings 97xx points
oc (1228Mhz) 8xxx

New Macław · Mar 5, 2014

Yes, it isn't real OC as far as I see.

ertank07 · Mar 5, 2014

New Macław said:
Yes, it isn't real OC as far as I see.

Do you work for overclocking in the future?

PTGamer · Mar 5, 2014

ertank07 said:
Do you work for overclocking in the future?

he already tried once, and it needed more work..
the cpu wasnt getting the desired frequency. it would just bounce btween stock max and the frequecy selected...

oc right now isnt the most needed feature and it will not be much of a gain in performance.

lets face it, our cpu isnt the most powerfull out there..
its a rip-off the NovaThor8500
the CPU it self its the same but the modem part is a bit diferent, so ste-ericsson named it NovaThor U8420.

This chip was aimed for mid to low performance devices.

The ST-Ericsson NovaThor U842 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It features two Cortex-A9 cores with NEON extensions, a ARM Mali-400 MP1 single core graphics card and a media processor.

Series
Codename ARMv7
Clock Rate 1000 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads 2 / 2
Manufacturing Technology 45 nm
Features ARM Mali 400 (Single Core), LP-DDR2 memory, HSPA
64 Bit no 64 Bit support
Announcement Date 06/01/2011
Product Link (external) NovaThor U8420

and if you dont know STE&ericsson are splited now.
http://www.stericsson.com/

Jonny · Mar 5, 2014

FedeeManchiini said:
Try my BETA OC Kernel! based on maclaw sources, and added LiveOPP(OC/OV etc etc) SioPlus from CoCore Kernel! Thanks cocafe and maclaw!

I have removed the attachment zip file - please do not post a kernel without also uploading your kernel sources as doing so violates the GNU General Public License v2 and XDA forum rules, I recommend using somewhere like github or bitbucket to upload your sources to.

honeyx · Mar 5, 2014

spanish33 said:
Yea I didn't notice much of a change in benchmark scores. You ever thought about doing a kernel yourself for s3mini?

Maybe in the near future when I´ve added some more fixes into my personal kernel I´m running now. But due to not much time I´m first trying to fix some further issues. My priority would be also not to add higher clocks but undervolting options.

FedeeManchiini · Mar 6, 2014

PTGamer said:
no performance improvements with maclaws cm11 02-03-2014 only for the worse...
antutu score: 9850 @1000Mhz governor: on demand IO:noop
antutu score: 9748 @1200MHz governor: on demand. IO:noop

last test
antutu score: 8775 @1228MHz governor: performance IO:noop
CPU integer 769 cpu float 580

i think the cpu isnt scaling correctly. anyway open a thread

i modded the parameters of liveOPP, get only 1050Mhz stable, but this time improves performance

Original:

Code:

static struct liveopp_arm_table liveopp_arm[] = {
//	{100000,  115200,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00010103, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{200000,  200000,  ARM_EXTCLK,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000581, 0x00050168, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 0, 1},
	{400000,  399360,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x01050168, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 0, 1},
	{600000,  614400,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00010110, 0x0C, 0x20, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{800000,  798720,  ARM_100_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00050168, 0x0B, 0x24, 0xDB, 0, 0},
	{1000000, 998400,  ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x0001011A, 0x0B, 0x2F, 0xDB, 0, 0},
	{1050000, 1075200, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x0001011C, 0x0B, 0x30, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{1100000, 1113600, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x0001011D, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{1150000, 1152000, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x0001011E, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{1200000, 1190400, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x0001011F, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
	{1228000, 1228800, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x00010120, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
//	{1267200, 1267200, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x00010121, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
};

Modified:

Code:

static struct liveopp_arm_table liveopp_arm[] = {
//	{100000,  115200,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00010103, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 1, 1},
	{200000,  200000,  ARM_EXTCLK,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000581, 0x00050168, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 0, 1},
	{400000,  399360,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x01050168, 0x0C, 0x1A, 0xDB, 0, 1},
	{600000,  614400,  ARM_50_OPP,  ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00010110, 0x0C, 0x20, 0xDB, 0, 0},
	{800000,  798720,  ARM_100_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x00050168, 0x0B, 0x24, 0xDB, 0, 1},
	{1000000, 998400,  ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x0001011A, 0x0B, 0x2F, 0xDB, 0, 0},
	{1050000, 1075200, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x0001011C, 0x0B, 0x4F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
	{1100000, 1113600, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_IGNORE,  0x00000741, 0x0001011D, 0x0B, 0x5F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
	{1150000, 1152000, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x0001011E, 0x0B, 0x5F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
//	{1200000, 1190400, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x0001011F, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
//	{1228000, 1228800, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x00010120, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
//	{1267200, 1267200, ARM_MAX_OPP, ARM_100_OPP, 0x00000741, 0x00010121, 0x0B, 0x3F, 0xCF, 1, 1},
};

Carlyle_f · Mar 6, 2014

FedeeManchiini said:
i modded the parameters of liveOPP, get only 1050Mhz stable, but this time improves performance

Can you upload the kernel again please? I want to test this kernel

Sent from my U.S.S Enterprise NCC-1701-A

PTGamer · Mar 6, 2014

Carlyle777 said:
Can you upload the kernel again please? I want to test this kernel

Sent from my U.S.S Enterprise NCC-1701-A

search before posting

I have removed the attachment zip file - please do not post a kernel without also uploading your kernel sources as doing so violates the GNU General Public License v2 and XDA forum rules, I recommend using somewhere like github or bitbucket to upload your sources to.

Carlyle_f · Mar 6, 2014

PTGamer said:
search before posting

I read that, I thought maybe you would upload the sources and start a thread so maybe more developers could help

I really want an OC kernel

Sent from my U.S.S Enterprise NCC-1701-A

FedeeManchiini · Mar 6, 2014

my kernel is based on the maclaw sources, I have to upload the resources?

albertusac · Mar 6, 2014

FedeeManchiini said:
my kernel is based on the maclaw sources, I have to upload the resources?

You should make your own thread

Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk

Jonny · Mar 11, 2014

Thread closed and links removed as OP has not uploaded his kernel sources.

[KERNEL CM11/Carbon4.4.2/AOKP4.4.2/CM10.2] Chaco kernel 20140116

Senior Member

Senior Member

Attachments

Senior Member

Senior Member

Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Retired Forum Moderator

Senior Member

Member

Attachments

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Member

Senior Member

Retired Forum Moderator

Similar threads

Top Liked Posts