I'm assuming this will work on G4 as well. But my question is will this work with a custom CM kernel? Or is it just for stock?
Since it disables zram, the easiest way is to run the command "free" and see if the swap sections are all zero.
doesn't do much. Ran it for three days on h900 and i noticed battery drain while in standby..any confirmation for h900
wrong. swap is a completely different thing.Since it disables zram, the easiest way is to run the command "free" and see if the swap sections are all zero.
You should see something like this: see attachment...wrong. swap is a completely different thing.
swap is always 0 except if you manually turn it on via an app, or a swap partition on your storage plus a script.
And I thank you for thatI'm offering merely a small, simple yet effective mod with this.
Yes, correct. It is a GPU governor. And it should be available with the Adreno 400 series GPU's.And I thank you for that:good:
simple_ondemand isn't found here on my G4 running a stock CM kernel. It might be there on the stock G4 ROM though, I've never checked that out. But do you think this will do any kind of damage if I applied this on my current state? Or will it just ignore the line that switches governors?
EDIT: IGNORE ALL THIS! Didn't notice at first it was a GPU governor, which is there on CM... sowwy!
Zram is basically swap on a special device (/dev/block/zram0)wrong. swap is a completely different thing.
swap is always 0 except if you manually turn it on via an app, or a swap partition on your storage plus a script.
Interesting, your pictures are actually showing the opposite of what you said, if I am reading that right. Both are spending the majority of their time at the 800 MHz range, and the bigger cores are used less, it seems. What I'm going to do, is updated the hispeed_freq to something of a lower value, and adjust the above_hispeed_delay to a value twice the timer rate for cores 4 and 5... This should reduce CPU spikes and take care of low load a little better for the bigger cores.I've tried the first release and what I've noticed is that the big cores jump more often than the little ones, wich makes a higher drain on battery because the big one is power hungry.
It doesn't jump to higher frequencies but uses much more the big cores as you can see on screenshot below.
![]()
![]()
Enviado do meu LG-H815 através de Tapatalk
And again, I stand corrected. I was either drunk or I had a stupidity spike.Zram is basically swap on a special device (/dev/block/zram0)
If you see the percentage of every frequencies in both screenshots you see that little core basically uses the lower frequencie and the 800mhz one on the majority of time.Interesting, your pictures are actually showing the opposite of what you said, if I am reading that right. Both are spending the majority of their time at the 800 MHz range, and the bigger cores are used less, it seems. What I'm going to do, is updated the hispeed_freq to something of a lower value, and adjust the above_hispeed_delay to a value twice the timer rate for cores 4 and 5... This should reduce CPU spikes and take care of low load a little better for the bigger cores.
Thanks for the screenshots, very useful info.
EDIT*** updated the link, give that one a shot. Should be quite noticeable. :good:
Just use a root explorer and put the file on proper location and give the proper permissions.I need help guys. I keep getting no such file or Directory. What am i doing wrong? Is the file not in the proper location?
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
Yeah I downloaded the 2nd update yesterday and it had been updated again (3rd?). Checked the checksum and both files are identical?@warBeard_actual
Um, are you sure you had updated the links? They seem to be the same for me...
EDIT: For the record, I also experienced idle drain like @i42o