Keon works better than a lot of mid range Android that I have tried (remember that it's a developer preview unit)... and the specific of this phone are most like low range phone than mid range.
And, I use Firefox on every PC I use and rarely I experience lack of memory, even if I navigate with a lot of tabs opened!
Amazing project, I'm selling my One X and getting one of these!
They did it. And the only thing holding me back buying this thing is: I don't know how many people will port some custom roms to this, like CM. I really got used to some features of CM. And if the modded android of fairphone is not very good, I would like to swich to another rom. But If nobody develops stuff for it, it would be a shame
Unfortunatly I have too less time on my hands and too little knowledge to port CM myself. I guess I have to sleep on it few more nightsBut this thing looks hot (at least on the spec sheet)
Well I'll do my bestI'm still kind of a noob in android development, but I'm learning fast
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Great goal for Fairphone.. I hope now to semptember/october they can achieve the next goal of 20.000 unit sell. I am waiting for my Fairphone (nr. #1203) now.
In the end i've made my choice and ordered a fairphone
mine is number 7359 and I've placed my order yesterday.. now the counter is at 8241
but the best thing is that it was 8235 a sew secs ago!!
are we going to hit 10k before tomorrow night?
not really shure about it, but ehi it's already near the double needed to start this![]()
Hi Deedend, I know about that project and I am very happy about the try to get a "fair phone". It's a first step which all manufacturer should follow. The device is not high end, but as I believe after seeing the ability of the built in SoC (not all facts are out there) in some benchmarks, I think it can beat our beloved Galaxy Nexus.
However, this projects aims another goal than winning speed tests. I like it, my brother ordered one as well. Maybe we should ask for a separate forum when it is sent to its customers.
Currently, we are at 9440 ordered Fairphones. I hope this project, located in Netherland, home of some wonderful people like @Chainfire, will be a success and can go on with further products teaching the big ones like Asus, HTC, LG, Samsung, Sony... and others.
We have decided to go for increased mechanical reliability. By separating the Dragontrail tempered glass (top layer) from the glass on the touch panel (bottom layer), the likelihood that the glass will break is minimal. And if it does, you'll still be able to use your touch panel. As a consequence, the phone will be 5 grams heavier and 0.2 mm (this is only one fifth of a milimeter) thicker.
Saw this too. Good news. Most of all a great example of how intended ownership of products is to be achieved.
Hopefully repairability will equally apply to the hardware buttons on this phone.
Furthermore I've been wondering what quality photos this camera will be capable of. Anyone have any idea what to expect?
For lack of further specifications I could not retrieve benchmarks and such for this particular part of the Fairphone project.
(Regarding the quad-core chipset I could, fortunately, and I found that it does a fine job in many low and middle end Chinaphones already, as well as in at least one Acer phone with a favorable review.)
- Tapatalked from Platform I9000, JB 4.2.2, on Mackay Rom & kernel, baseband I9000XXJVT, powered by PolarCell at 1800 mAh
Oh yes, indeed. My aged Galaxy Nexus is probably slower than this Fairphone, so not so bad, also the battery can last longer than on the Gnex, but compared to the also "old" Galaxy S3 LTE, the Fairphone is way slower. Ok, there are no benchmarks out now, but the SoC benchmarks available in the internet might show up an accurate result. My brother bought one, so, I can provide you with all benchmarks, if he gets it.![]()
Thanks for your help in 'benchmarking'It does help. Made me check out what has been reported about the Galaxy Nexus. Totally acceptable playing field for me with regards to SoC performances.
Question marks about the level of photography and video capabilities still remain, although I can't imagine them to be too poor for an unpretentious amateur in those fields, such as myself.
Just wishing to be able to occasionally produce pictures (the lucky shots we all can make from time to time) that still look good on a bigger screen, or perhaps even framed on the wall at a reasonable size, resolutionwise.
And as for video, I would be asking for acceptable colors, acceptable resolution, and an unhindered capability, chipwise, to process video shooting without frequent hiccupsfor no apparent reason (as if I were answering a Skype call right in the middle, or something like that).
Your comparison and the known G Nexus benchmarks seem to suggest that this Fairphone would indeed be able to deliver as much as this...
Do you still agree? Or would you as a tester definitively suggest I wait until others have had the chance to test ask this for me?
- Tapatalked from Platform I9000, JB 4.2.2, on Mackay Rom & kernel, baseband I9000XXJVT, powered by PolarCell at 1800 mAh
Great goal for Fairphone.. I hope now to semptember/october they can achieve the next goal of 20.000 unit sell. I am waiting for my Fairphone (nr. #1203) now.
In the end i've made my choice and ordered a fairphone
mine is number 7359 and I've placed my order yesterday.. now the counter is at 8241
but the best thing is that it was 8235 a sew secs ago!!
are we going to hit 10k before tomorrow night?
not really shure about it, but ehi it's already near the double needed to start this![]()
All I'm seeing is a run-of-the-mill qHD phone which would cost $100 in Aliexpress, but it's being sold for 4 times that because it has a couple of "conflict-free"minerals (take our word for it!) while the rest of the phone contains the same internals done in the same labor conditions as any other phone.
Fair trade has mostly been an excuse to charge terrific markups abusing the good faith of people, and this thing is no different at all.