I don't necessarily disagree with your overall point but if we are going to make the case that MiX should be able to do a particular function then we should compare it to an app that is well-known for performing that particular function. SD Maid is arguably one of the best for that particular purpose. Any app considering adding a storage analyzer should compare to SD Maid and other apps that do the same thing.
but i remember that Hootan some years ago had started to improve a feature for Storage Analyzer (Do not remember well the name he gave) and then he abandoned and the feature option was hidden (Only option label was available by long press address bar)...
I remember that as well. It was very nice looking but it performed inconsistently across different devices and drives, in some cases having inaccurate or missing results.
I do not think that should be a size or footprint reason that must be considered if we are speaking about Mixplorer...
Instead the question is: is that feature worth to be improved or not?
One of MiXplorer's most valued aspects is its small resource footprint. To those people who value or require small resource footprint the question becomes "is the potential gain worth the expenditure of resources required to achieve it".
Storage analyzer is something that most file managers have (more or less improved) and for me is something that is missing in Mix... Yes, it was an old discussion but I will be very happy to have something similar also in Mix.
+1... if it does not increase the resource footprint... and if it can actually do what the specialist apps to which it is being compared can do.
Last edited: