TIDAL should be better if set to use FLAC 44.1/16 which will play unmodified via Audio Cast since it is already 44.1/16.
If Apple is capable of outputting lossless at 44.1/16, it should be as good.
Note that for TIDAL, you can also use the integration of TIDAL in BubbleUPnP so your renderer streams directly from TIDAL. There should theoretically not be a difference in audio quality (since both are FLAC 44.1/16), but using BubbleUPnP is more direct (less of a black box).
Sorry. Just to clarify, when streaming MQA Tidal tracks by Audio Cast, these MQA tracks would be resampled by Android? Hence, better if these tracks are downloaded in HiFi quality (i.e. 16/44.1) to avoid Android resampling and for better sound?@wwyjoe
Yes, Audio Cast sends a continuous PCM stream at a fixed samplerate/bitdepth. There is no other way. It is a bit similar to AirPlay which also operates at 44.1/16. If you play HiRes Music in Apple Music (or any other app) or audio that is not already 44.1/16, it will be resampled by the system (Android) and that's what BubbleUPnP reads for sending back to the renderer.
TIDAL should be better if set to use FLAC 44.1/16 which will play unmodified via Audio Cast since it is already 44.1/16.
If Apple is capable of outputting lossless at 44.1/16, it should be as good.
Note that for TIDAL, you can also use the integration of TIDAL in BubbleUPnP so your renderer streams directly from TIDAL. There should theoretically not be a difference in audio quality (since both are FLAC 44.1/16), but using BubbleUPnP is more direct (less of a black box).
Last edited: