[Benchmark] Performance: F2FS vs EXT4 on Marshmallow

[ssceddie]

I am proud to present benchmark competition between ext4 and f2fs file systems on Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini LTE (GT-I9195).

Base for this Benchmark

ROM: AICP - 11.0 - MM 6.0.1_r3 | OFFICIAL NIGHTLIES Build : aicp_serranoltexx_mm-11.0-NIGHTLY-20160202.zip
Gapps: No
Recovery: TWRP 2.8.7.0

f2fs
I was formatting 2 partitions as below to f2fs.(CM Marshmallow-Builds doesn´t support other partitions at the moment,waiting for a MM-Kernel )

/cache
/data

I was using 4 benchmark apps ( CF-Bench,RL Bench,Androbench,AnTuTu) to test performance.

CF-Bench
CF-Bench is an overall benchmark by Chainfire which measure everything except graphics.

RL Bench
RL Bench is an SQLite benchmark, it only tests database read/writes with various SQL commands in various amounts.

Androbench
Androbench is supposedly an all-around I/O benchmark.

AnTuTu
No need for an introduction, it's probably the most popular benchmark these days.

THX to somboons for his inspirating LG G2 Benchmark-Thread

PS. please excuse me, if my english not the best^^

 

[piskor]

@ssceddie
So, which one is better? Which screenshots concerns ext4 and which one concerns f2fs?

 

[ssceddie]

Omg,on mobiles devices you cant see the file-names,right? On Windows you can See the file-names. But I will edit the pics these days.....damn^^

 

[piskor]

On windows7 I can save each one as attachment.php.png

 

[wolverinemaister]

Maybe can you tell us according to the time which file system did u use at 19:46 and 21:10? Thanks for the comparison it was a really good idea. Im courious about how much is the difference with gapps

 

[ssceddie]

Maybe can you tell us according to the time which file system did u use at 19:46 and 21:10? Thanks for the comparison it was a really good idea. Im courious about how much is the difference with gapps

Ah gold idea, I'd made the test with ext4,first. But I'll edit the screens later.

Did you think the difference is signifcant with gapps? I dont think so....

@piskor @wolverinemaister
Edit: Now, on the left side on top of the screens you can see what is ext4 and f2fs

 

[semdoc]

Ah gold idea, I'd made the test with ext4,first. But I'll edit the screens later.

Did you think the difference is signifcant with gapps? I dont think so....

@piskor @wolverinemaister
Edit: Now, on the left side on top of the screens you can see what is ext4 and f2fs

Never been a great fan of F2FS...

But;

Option is the option... So some users is asking for it... That's why I'm tryin to provide it...

No big difference IMHO.

 

[savvy1968]

Never been a great fan of F2FS...

But;

Option is the option... So some users is asking for it... That's why I'm tryin to provide it...

No big difference IMHO.

i agree im sticking with what i trust.

 

[ssceddie]

No big difference IMHO.

Yes my opinion,too. But it were interesting to know, if the difference bigger if /system could be format to f2fs too , sometime if that possible^^

 

[vbajs]

Yes my opinion,too. But it were interesting to know, if the difference bigger if /system could be format to f2fs too , sometime if that possible^^

According to @bon_bon
Formating /system to f2fs is going to make it SLOW, i never tried to format it but it's better to keep /system to ext4

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk