I don't understand the people who buys phones looking at benchmark scores.
This logic should be changed.
"Iphone vs Others" is like "Intel vs AMD". Although AMD is much better in many cases among the same class motherboards, Intel makes it giving much better values in Benchmark scores. Test it man ! Do real tests , not benchmarking !
Well, before the arrival of our asynchronous dual core, benchmarks have always been kinda trusted. At least, their scores have always increased proportionally to the power of the devices (I mean each new generation of CPU was killing the previous one in benchmark scores, scores improved proportionnally to the overclocking etc)
Then the Sensation came out.....fast UI using our both cores, but slow benchmarks (and 3D!!!!) because most of the time our second core was OFF, or just not used by apps.
And so people started to say benchmarks are **** because they have fast UI whatever the very low bench scores of the Sensation and the not-so-huge 3D perf.
Nevermind, today we can force CPU1 and have huge scores too.
Hey man, as for me, I don't understand people buying a dual-core with a GPU but who don't care of raw performance

Why didn't they buy a blackberry if they just have a professional use? Because they love the design of the case? lol Let them go for the Sensation XL, single core but nice too, sure it will have lower bench scores ^^
Don't see any offense, I'm just trying to say that we can use the same phone differently and appreciate it differently. I need my phone to deliver the biggest CPU power possible, and here, the highest CPU power I have, the higher benchmark scores I have too.
And the most important point here: Apple is clearly telling lies, fake figures, trusting bench or not is not the point here.