[Build Guide][Flo/Deb] - Pure AOSP 6.0.0_r1

[oops_mr_gumby]

the aosp_hammerhead-ota-eng.zip the one that you flash?

That's correct.

does that mean that I need to build it with r11 instead?

As I understand it, yes. Some of those rXX versions are just for device-specific updates.

 

[fhem]

I didn't provide any build/tag for my Nexus 5. I just synced to the newest branch, which was android-6.0.1_r16. Now that I see that list, it doesn't list Nexus 5 next to r16. So does that mean that I need to build it with r11 instead?

As I understand it, yes. Some of those rXX versions are just for device-specific updates.

As long as it built and flashed OK you should be good at r16 ---- r12 , r13, and r16 just added some stuff for nexus 9, nexus player and pixel c. You can check the changelogs here.

 

[oops_mr_gumby]

To see the changes from r11 to r16 you can apparently try running:

repo forall -pc 'git log --no-merges --oneline android-6.0.1_r11..android-6.0.1_r16

But I just installed a fresh OS and I don't haven't setup a build environment yet so I don't know what format the output comes in, or how useful it might be to you in this case.

I'm no expert but I have read at least one report of problems, I think it was the phone didn't work on a nexus 5 with the pixel c update rXX version installed. I suspect some combinations will work and other won't.

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Hello everybody !

I change my OS from Ubuntu 14.04 to Debian Stretch.
When I start compiling, I've got this error :

You are attempting to build with the incorrect version
of java.
 
Your version is: openjdk version "1.8.0_91" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-8u91-b14-2-b14) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode).
The required version is: "1.7.x"

However, Google recommends to install openjdk8.

Also here : https://source.android.com/source/building.html#wrong-java-version , it's written :

Another JDK previously installed appearing in your path. Prepend the correct JDK to the beginning of your PATH or remove the problematic JDK.

What's the PATH ?

I'm a "bit" lost.

 

[fhem]

Hello everybody !

I change my OS from Ubuntu 14.04 to Debian Stretch.
When I start compiling, I've got this error :

You are attempting to build with the incorrect version
of java.
 
Your version is: openjdk version "1.8.0_91" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-8u91-b14-2-b14) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode).
The required version is: "1.7.x"

However, Google recommends to install openjdk8.

Also here : https://source.android.com/source/building.html#wrong-java-version , it's written :

What's the PATH ?

I'm a "bit" lost.

Just comment out or delete these lines and it will build fine with Open 8. You will still get the warning message but it will complete the build and all will be good. The java 8 is for the master branch and N --- but MM 6.XXXXXXX will build fine with Open 8.

FYI ----> Look at lines 176 and 177

Java Development Kit (JDK)

Please note, since there are no available supported OpenJDK 8 packages for Ubuntu 14.04, the Ubuntu 15.04 packages must be installed manually. See JDK for Ubuntu LTS 14.04 for precise instructions.

The master branch of Android in AOSP: Ubuntu - OpenJDK 8, Mac OS - jdk 8u45 or newer
Android 5.x (Lollipop) - Android 6.0 (Marshmallow): Ubuntu - OpenJDK 7, Mac OS - jdk-7u71-macosx-x64.dmg
Android 2.3.x (Gingerbread) - Android 4.4.x (KitKat): Ubuntu - Java JDK 6, Mac OS - Java JDK 6
Android 1.5 (Cupcake) - Android 2.2.x (Froyo): Ubuntu - Java JDK 5

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Just comment out or delete these lines and it will build fine with Open 8. You will still get the warning message but it will complete the build and all will be good. The java 8 is for the master branch and N --- but MM 6.XXXXXXX will build fine with Open 8.

I delete the red lines and add the green lines ? (Sorry this noob question)

 

[fhem]

I delete the red lines and add the green lines ? (Sorry this noob question)

The red - is the old and the green + is the new so ...................... so you can see I simply added # at the beginning of lines 171, 192, 203 , and 219. Adding the # simply comments out that line ---> same as deleting. So you could also delete lines 171, 192, 203, and 219 and get the same result.

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Adding the # simply comments out that line ---> same as deleting. So you could also delete lines 171, 192, 203, and 219 and get the same result.

Ok, I test your solution in a few hours when I come back home.
Thank you !!!

EDIT :
@fhem : compiling in progress, thank you !

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

external/guava/guava/src/com/google/common/reflect/Types.java:317: error: TypeVariableImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method getAnnotatedBounds() in TypeVariable
  private static final class TypeVariableImpl<D extends GenericDeclaration>
                       ^
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 error
1 warning
build/core/host_java_library.mk:91*: la recette pour la cible «*out/host/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/guavalib_intermediates/javalib.jar*» a échouée
make: *** [out/host/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/guavalib_intermediates/javalib.jar] Erreur 41
make: *** Attente des tâches non terminées....

#### make failed to build some targets (17:52 (mm:ss)) ####

Any idea ?

 

[fhem]

external/guava/guava/src/com/google/common/reflect/Types.java:317: error: TypeVariableImpl is not abstract and does not override abstract method getAnnotatedBounds() in TypeVariable
  private static final class TypeVariableImpl<D extends GenericDeclaration>
                       ^
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
1 error
1 warning
build/core/host_java_library.mk:91*: la recette pour la cible «*out/host/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/guavalib_intermediates/javalib.jar*» a échouée
make: *** [out/host/common/obj/JAVA_LIBRARIES/guavalib_intermediates/javalib.jar] Erreur 41
make: *** Attente des tâches non terminées....

#### make failed to build some targets (17:52 (mm:ss)) ####

Any idea ?

I haven't seen that error but it looks like a problem w/ your java.
Run each of the following from your linux terminal and post results.

java -version

sudo update-alternatives --config java

sudo update-alternatives --config javac

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Run each of the following from your linux terminal and post results.

root@salon:/home/pierre# java --version
Unrecognized option: --version
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
root@salon:/home/pierre# update-alternatives --config java
Il n'existe qu'une «*alternative*» dans le groupe de liens java (qui fournit /usr/bin/java)*:*/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java
Rien à configurer.
root@salon:/home/pierre# update-alternatives --config javac
Il n'existe qu'une «*alternative*» dans le groupe de liens javac (qui fournit /usr/bin/javac)*:*/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/javac
Rien à configurer.

First result seems not good...

 

[fhem]

root@salon:/home/pierre# java --version
Unrecognized option: --version
Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
root@salon:/home/pierre# update-alternatives --config java
Il n'existe qu'une «*alternative*» dans le groupe de liens java (qui fournit /usr/bin/java)*:*/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/bin/java
Rien à configurer.
root@salon:/home/pierre# update-alternatives --config javac
Il n'existe qu'une «*alternative*» dans le groupe de liens javac (qui fournit /usr/bin/javac)*:*/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/bin/javac
Rien à configurer.

First result seems not good...

I was wrong sorry should be------> java -version

and you look to be good with the others not sure sorry

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

I was wrong sorry should be------> java -version

and you look to be good with the others not sure sorry

pierre@salon:~$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_91"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-8u91-b14-2-b14)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode)

And yes the others are good, sorry I'm a french noob

 

[fhem]

pierre@salon:~$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_91"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_91-8u91-b14-2-b14)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.91-b14, mixed mode)

And yes the others are good, sorry I'm a french noob

No problem Your English is much better then my French LOL -----> I'm really not sure about that error. Which aosp branch/tag are you trying to build and for which device?? I am currently building aosp 6.0.1_r25 for N6, N6P, and N9 using java 8 w/o any issues.

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Which aosp branch/tag are you trying to build and for which device??

android-6.0.1_r41 for hammerhead.
before to install debian stretch I was on ubuntu 14.04 and no issue

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Attach my modded manifest, may be I delete a line......
But I done this before, and no issue

 

[fhem]

Attach my modded manifest, may be I delete a line......
But I done this before, and no issue

Hate to say it but it sounds like the problem may be with Stretch. I know there people having problems w/ Ubuntu 16.04 also. I don't plan on updating to 16.04 base until I'm sure they get all the bugs out.
Sounds like Stretch is still very new and bound to have issues.

Good luck with getting it figured out. Sorry I can't do more to help.

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Sounds like Stretch is still very new and bound to have issues.

Good luck with getting it figured out. Sorry I can't do more to help.

I plan to reisntall ubuntu 14.04 just for compiling. I hope when N will be out, issues will be solved.

Thank to take time for me !

 

[BreckZeBoulay]

Just for information, no problem with Debian Jessie.

 

[Suici Doga]

I have a laptop which has AMD A8-4500M.When compiling AOSP with `-j4` it compiles really fast but it heats up to 98C and I quickly stop it?.About 2 months ago the thermal paste has been applied and the fan is clean.

when compiling on a single core the temperature is about 88C but it is slooow.

Any suggestions?

UPDATE : Reapplied thermal paste and undervolted (see https://gist.github.com/SuicSoft/ea59b5e7856bafdb6972406c4dae331d) and now it doesn't go above 80C even when compiling with 4 cores.And how can I get it to boost for longer since it doesn't overheat but still reduces speed to 1.9Ghz after 2 minutes.