CM10 came out quicker than CM9

[swift2fly]

as the title says. i was running CM7 on my DHD and my sensation for the longest time and was anxious for the CM9 release. i tried CM9 for a bit then decided to flash HNS and then Virtuous. my point is, CM9 still has a few bugs and CM10 beta has been released. will CM9 be left since CM10 will now be the focus? i was waiting for a solid CM9 rom to be released but i guess i'll see how the progress of CM10 comes along.

sent from the Nudy bar, one handed.

 

[Adamsville MITM]

CM10 is still in alpha stages... very little important aspects even work

CM7 and CM9 are based on two completely different Android builds, CM10 based on JB is very similar to CM9 based on ICS

 

[remus82]

If the developers manage to get a fairly stable build of cm10 they may well move on to cm10 altogether. Does not make sense to develop cm9 anymore. Well unless there is something important in cm9 that cannot be fixed in 10

 

[kpjimmy]

I thought I read somewhere that CM9 will still be worked on and right now they are looking to release the CM9 RC. CM10 was out quicker because it's base off of CM9 and is not a build from the ground up like it was for CM9. Because of this, they can use most of the build to work on CM10.

 

[urmothersluvr]

Cm9 is on RC2 now so I think cm9 came quicker and its basically fully stable. I use it as a daily

Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app

 

[denverpedro]

CM9 RC2

Cm9 is on RC2 now so I think cm9 came quicker and its basically fully stable. I use it as a daily

Sent from my HTC Sensation using xda app-developers app

I second that. I stayed away from CM9 on the Sensation for a long time since it was just not quite stable/functional enough for me (stable maybe but some of the key functions weren't stable enough and battery life was killing me for a while).

Anyway, I installed CM9 RC2 late last week; I think the day it came out. Anyway... to the point... CM9 RC2 has been extremely stable for me, battery life has been great (not QUITE as good as some of the Sense-Less ROMs out there like Virtuous or ExtremeSensation but close enough). I much prefer a clean AOSP system anyway so I'm sticking with it.

With CM10 on the way I'm encouraged by the fact that we finally have a stable CM9 for them to build off of. Thanks to the whole crew who has been working on it!

-Pete

 

[pottyvick]

I second that. I stayed away from CM9 on the Sensation for a long time since it was just not quite stable/functional enough for me (stable maybe but some of the key functions weren't stable enough and battery life was killing me for a while).

Anyway, I installed CM9 RC2 late last week; I think the day it came out. Anyway... to the point... CM9 RC2 has been extremely stable for me, battery life has been great (not QUITE as good as some of the Sense-Less ROMs out there like Virtuous or ExtremeSensation but close enough). I much prefer a clean AOSP system anyway so I'm sticking with it.

With CM10 on the way I'm encouraged by the fact that we finally have a stable CM9 for them to build off of. Thanks to the whole crew who has been working on it!

-Pete

What i dont like about cm9 is the overall volume... its very low compared to sense roms...

 

[progmanos]

Hmm....the volume issue would be something worth investigating.

 

[redbullcat]

CM9 took quite a while for ROMs/kangs/unofficial nightlies to start appearing. This was because they needed to rewrite the whole CM source tree (the modifications CM makes to Android) from scratch. Jelly Bean, under the hood, is quite similar to ICS, so it's a lot lot easier to port things from CM9 to CM10. Porting things from CM7 to CM9 was almost, if not impossible.

 

[aznprodgy]

What i dont like about cm9 is the overall volume... its very low compared to sense roms...

download Volume+ from the play store, Ive used it for quite a while on lots of roms with no problem